Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

I was a member of this forum in 2003/2004

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: I was a member of this forum in 2003/2004

Unread postby ralfy » Wed 04 Apr 2012, 02:55:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kristen', 'P')eak Oil is merely innocent speculation and ideations on what the future in Energy will be. There have been many failed predictions, like in 2005, when members were convinced by 2010 our national grid wouldn't be functional. Although those who predicted a plateau during the 0's with recessions caused by high oil prices (Which is due to a slue of factors) may still me proven right, Perhaps this happenstance (managed decline) will play out over many decades.


Peak oil is a fact, as seen in oil production for the U.S. in 1970 and for two-thirds of oil-producing countries since. If there are any "merely innocent speculations and ideations," they may involve, say, claims by SA in 2009 that oil production would easily breach 15 mb/d by 2011.

There have also been no failed predictions. Hubbert's prediction about U.S. oil production came true, and so did his point out global oil production (1995 + 10 years). BP has shown this in its annual, with oil demand exceeding production since 2006, and with oil production barely rising even given higher oil prices.

About this playing out for several decades, the IEA states the same, but with only a 9-pct increase for the next two decades in energy from all oil and gas sources put online, and assuming that conventional sources don't follow historical flow rates. Meanwhile, demand has to go up around 2 pct per annum to meet economic growth.
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland

Re: I was a member of this forum in 2003/2004

Unread postby sparky » Wed 04 Apr 2012, 04:57:56

.
a colapse of international trade would see more local manufacturing of nescessities
as for a die off , yes of course
but the poor non food producing countries would be hit the hardest
User avatar
sparky
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3587
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney , OZ

Re: I was a member of this forum in 2003/2004

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Wed 04 Apr 2012, 06:17:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kristen', 'P')eak Oil is merely innocent speculation and ideations on what the future in Energy will be. There have been many failed predictions, like in 2005, when members were convinced by 2010 our national grid wouldn't be functional. Although those who predicted a plateau during the 0's with recessions caused by high oil prices (Which is due to a slue of factors) may still me proven right, Perhaps this happenstance (managed decline) will play out over many decades.

I'm pessimistic, given the quality of our leaders and the judgement they've shown so far.

As I type this, I'm looking at usdebtclock.org, fascinated by 15.6 trillion in debt and $137,784 per taxpayer. The jacka$$es running the show in both parties could ruin a free lunch.

I give 10 to 20 years before things implode in the US to a dire level; all my preps should be done in 12. (food, solar, water, underground shipping container shelter)


Is that wage tax paying, profit tax paying or potential but not at all taxpayers?
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: I was a member of this forum in 2003/2004

Unread postby rangerone314 » Wed 04 Apr 2012, 21:26:09

The site did not define taxpayers, but math-wise it comes out to 113 million taxpayers.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: I was a member of this forum in 2003/2004

Unread postby Frank » Sun 08 Apr 2012, 10:48:05

I've been a member for quite a few years also (late-2004) and although I've been following "energy" trends for 30 years I always think of Devil's position (remember him?). This was that although Peak Oil is captivating, the substantive issue in front of us is global warming/climate change. Mankind is rapidly and irreversibly changing the planet we live on. This is the real issue, not whether or not a few more years of liquid hydrocarbon production will extend the ride or not.

In the context of history, 10 or 20 years or a few generations is NOTHING!
User avatar
Frank
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 556
Joined: Wed 15 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Maine/Nova Scotia

Re: I was a member of this forum in 2003/2004

Unread postby spot5050 » Fri 20 Apr 2012, 01:16:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('babystrangeloop', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('meemoe_uk', 'F')usion could potentially keep human civilization going till long after the sun has stopped burning.

Put a "potential" in your tank. :)

lol
spot5050
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 518
Joined: Tue 07 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Cheshire, England
Top

Re: I was a member of this forum in 2003/2004

Unread postby meemoe_uk » Fri 20 Apr 2012, 05:48:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', 'R')ead "Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed" by Jared Diamond or "Collapse of Complex Societies" by Joseph Tainter and get back to me about how unlikely it is for civilization to suddenly hit a tipping point and go off the edge into collapse.

The thing to keep in mind, is that to most people, everything seems fine, until suddenly it is not.


I read both those books when I was a peaker from 2006 to 2008. Diamond's book is a cooked up load of falsehoods ( the demise of Easter island was due to Westerner raids, not some self induced collapse ), Tainter's book is an extremely boring, over technical yarn over 1 little fanciful graph of diminishing returns.
They are both next to useless, 'cept are good fodder for doomers.
So here I am getting back to you.
- It's 0% chance that modern civilization will hit some self induced tipping point from over explotation of resources. Any percieved crisis will be planned and self imposed, like the rwandan civil war and genocide - which was artifically setup to happen.
These mass murder events are forever present. We'll definately continue to have them. World population can't rise indefinately, which is one of the reasons TPTB decide to cull parts of the population from time to time long before any real resource limit is reached, and they are sometimes dressed up as overpopulation hitting the bounds sustainability.
User avatar
meemoe_uk
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Tue 22 May 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: I was a member of this forum in 2003/2004

Unread postby meemoe_uk » Fri 20 Apr 2012, 12:25:39

>got evidence for that ridiculous assertion?
Sure, just dare to step outside of doomer fantasy land and google 'easter island myth' , there's plenty of academics who dispute Jared's doom story. It's just you've ignored them for years, so you've forgotten they are there.

>what will replace agricultural phosphorus?
Why do we need to replace that? I don't want to replace it.
User avatar
meemoe_uk
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Tue 22 May 2007, 03:00:00

Re: I was a member of this forum in 2003/2004

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Sat 21 Apr 2012, 15:46:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('meemoe_uk', ' ')- It's 0% chance that modern civilization will hit some self induced tipping point from over explotation of resources. Any percieved crisis will be planned and self imposed, like the rwandan civil war and genocide - which was artifically setup to happen.


We are not going to hit a 'tipping" point. On that I'd agree. For me..this has always been about the slow grind down as we near and pass the peak. I think we have a bit more time in the BAU scenario and then we get to the point of acknowledgment that oil will not grow and we grasp the decline. I think that is when things get very interesting. I'd say its going to be a long term level down every few years followed by short periods of hopeful but unsustainable economic growth. With each move down things get a bit worse, countries and economies devolve into longer term social and political problems. Humans dont deal well with this and it will be the spark for war and revolution.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('meemoe_uk', 'T')hese mass murder events are forever present. We'll definately continue to have them. World population can't rise indefinately, which is one of the reasons TPTB decide to cull parts of the population from time to time long before any real resource limit is reached, and they are sometimes dressed up as overpopulation hitting the bounds sustainability.


Really? "They" better get on the ball soon. Not doing a good enough job IMHO, despite the 100's of millions we've killed in modern times...guess what? Global population continues to grow. Time to get this party started! Myself, I dont buy into that premise. Mankind is stupid enough that we dont need help killing each other. As to the numbers needed to make things better, its just going to get worse the longer we move into the future. Its not happening fast enough.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta
Top

Re: I was a member of this forum in 2003/2004

Unread postby Ibon » Sat 21 Apr 2012, 19:56:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', 'T')ime to get this party started! Myself, I dont buy into that premise. Mankind is stupid enough that we dont need help killing each other.


The party is long overdue. And unfortunately we DO need help in ...........
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

Re: I was a member of this forum in 2003/2004

Unread postby meemoe_uk » Tue 01 May 2012, 07:45:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'A')sk me nicely and I will tell you to go FOAD "


A new attitude at peakoil.com
Hmm, that didn't last too long did it? I was immediately skeptical because I knew enforcing this ideal would cost peakoil.com half of its members thru bans.
Just 1 month after the 'new attitude', it's business as usual, a forum ad homien, compounded in that special PO.com way; by 2 subsequent moderator posts that have ignored it.
User avatar
meemoe_uk
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Tue 22 May 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: I was a member of this forum in 2003/2004

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Tue 01 May 2012, 07:59:22

Any more of that Fantabulous Orific Aromatic Deliciousness spare Pstarr? :razz:

Memoe, if your genocidal mania view was correct, why only a few thousand dead in each of the Arab Spring uprisings? Why did the tanks etc. not just blast the crowds to bits?
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: I was a member of this forum in 2003/2004

Unread postby meemoe_uk » Tue 01 May 2012, 09:43:58

>Memoe, if your genocidal mania view was correct, why only a few thousand dead in each of the Arab Spring uprisings?
Not every destablization is designed to incorparate genocide.
TPTB induce genocides for specific reasons.

Here's one reason...
As people on these doom forums like to say, over population causes poverty, an over supply in people vs under supply in jobs and resources. Poverty is useful to TBTB so they like to keep societies in poverty. Since impoverished societies tend also to have high population growth rates*, the overpopulation problem escalates; positive feedback.
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographi ... ic_paradox
At a certain point this growth has to be stopped, either by mass starvation or a civil war.

Most of the Arab countries involved in the spring unrisings don't have high enough populations to invoke the above reason.
The amount of genocide in Iraq is high though, well over 1 million killed since the 2003 US led invasion.
User avatar
meemoe_uk
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Tue 22 May 2007, 03:00:00

Re: I was a member of this forum in 2003/2004

Unread postby Revi » Tue 01 May 2012, 10:16:33

I was a member back in 2003, and I think we are seeing a lot of the problems associated with peak oil now. We're right on schedule. From here on in it gets interesting.
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: I was a member of this forum in 2003/2004

Unread postby gnm » Tue 01 May 2012, 10:41:14

What He said... Sure its taking a long time and not subscribing to some sort of doomer collapse fantasy but the grind down has definitely begun...

-G
gnm
 

Re: I was a member of this forum in 2003/2004

Unread postby Lore » Tue 01 May 2012, 11:02:56

Most of the fast crash crowd has left here. This is not a video game. Serious prognosticators understand that de-evolution takes a long time relative to the individual human experience.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: I was a member of this forum in 2003/2004

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Tue 01 May 2012, 14:31:19

meemoe,

Did he actually tell you to FOAD? I dont recall you asking him nicely. ;) I did see that though..its right up to the line we are trying to hold.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: I was a member of this forum in 2003/2004

Unread postby AgentR11 » Tue 01 May 2012, 19:24:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', 'I') think we are seeing a lot of the problems associated with peak oil now. We're right on schedule. From here on in it gets interesting.


ditto. I can recall the fast crasher's reaction to the notion that price and demand destruction were the answers to PO, not the problem when I first started posting here.

It's not pretty of course, the economy grinding down a hill, periodically smashing the breaks a bit hard, shedding jobs, shedding demand. Those in charge of the macro factors of the economy managing to keep the current dollar valuation of the economy slightly positive, thus preventing an economic apocalypse that would make Lehman look like cheese fries.

As long as no one crazy gets in charge of the numbers, we'll grind our way down to sustainability. A cruel, ugly, brutal path to sustainability; but it seems to be the one we've chosen; after all, it'd be a terrible thing if the politicians, financiers, engineers, and technocrats had to join the rabble for porridge rations... Can't have that!
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

cron