by Sixstrings » Tue 13 Mar 2012, 20:06:16
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', '[')b]I'd be more concerned about giving M.D.'s that sort of gatekeeper authority; between the ones that don't like guns, and those that will sign anything for cash; it sounds like a system designed to insure that evil, malevolent crazies get guns, and boring middle class people get denied.
What you're saying is you can't trust our doctors -- because we have for-profit healthcare, it's why we have pill mills and even your friendly family doc has Big Pharma reps wining and dining him (bribes).
Sounds like Dave is right, guns are handled sensibly in France, but it's a total picture we'd need the socialized medicine too so that you could trust the doctors to just be doctors and not Businessmen.
Anyhow this isn't applicable to the US. We have a lot of crazy folk over here, you'd have to take the guns away from most people who have them.

And a huge swath of the population is on some kind of anti-depressant or chill pill. How do you define mental health issues when the whole society has mental health issues?
It's a slippery slope. Just like chipping away at the constitutional right to abortion, once you open that door on your 2nd amendment rights you'll lose that too. Which was the point of my above reply.. gun rights could be eroded the same as they're doing with abortion rights.