by fletch_961 » Thu 20 Oct 2011, 21:27:14
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'N')ot your point that doomers are optimist. But that there are conundrums that will hurt us all. There is no easy way out.
It is kinda like the doomed man saying, "So kill me already!" He is not an optimist, just tired of the torture.
Perhaps you don't understand the definition of optimistic than:
op·ti·mis·tic /ˌɒptəˈmɪstɪk/ [op-tuh-mis-tik]
1.disposed to take a favorable view of events or conditions and to expect the most favorable outcome.
Unless the the tortured man had a favorable view of death and saw it as his mostly favorable outcome, he clearly was not an optimist. I would say a pessimist, who saw no favorable outcomes. He had given up.
Interesting...straw-man...but none-the-less...
On the other hand, if you have overlooked that quite a few poster look favorably upon peak-oil happening sooner rather than latter and expect favorable results from it [die-off, end to CO2 emissions, end of US hegemony, validation for having spent countless hours spent staring at a green screened monitor sending out replies to cornies, etc...take your pick], than we will have to agree to disagree.
Note: I take issue w/ dictionary.com definition of optimistic. The part where it says, " to expect the
most favorable outcome". Most favorable outcome if I was a tortured man would be to have three busty women with slim waists and child-bearing hips come in and rescue me. Pretty sure i would still be optimistic if the mother-in-law showed up.
