by k_semler » Wed 01 Jun 2005, 01:24:41
Note: Just because I am going "line by line" does not mean that I am refuting you, it is just easier for me to post like this. $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SidneyTawl', 'T')hanks, K
I didn't know. Your statement that you had prior experience made your claim a little easier to swallow.
I understand, I would find it hard to believe that someone with no experience could do it with this much speed too. I imagine if I work at it enough, I may someday get fast enough that it is the same speed as a key. I won't count on it anytime soon, but I will sure try! This is fun anyways.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SidneyTawl', 'B')y the way K, are you trying to protect yourself with the locks or your property.
Physical barrier first, lock second, and then Mr. Colt third. If they are intent upon entering my proptery enough to pick the lock, then they deserve to be shot. I don't know about you, but the few times I have knocked on someone's door with no awnser and tried the door only to have it open, I only have yelled "HELLO?? HELLO??" into the entry way, and if no awnser, I leave. If someone enters after that, it is obvious that thier intent is malicious.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SidneyTawl', 'L')ocks are no good for those that want in. Locks can be a helpful when you are gone and trust one door only.
I'll agree with that. Kind of hard to defend my property when I am not home. It still seems though as it is about as effective detterent as just closing the door and saying" Do not enter, Nobody is home" at the door, and hoping they respect my wishes. It kind of sucks knowing that the phycholigical reinforcement of locks on my doors was nothing but that though. It is amazing how insecure standard tumbler locks used on houses are.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SidneyTawl', 'H')owever if you're at home then locks, please. You better have something better than that.
Here Lies the United States Of America.
July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005
Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."
Rest In Peace.
Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
by rostov » Wed 01 Jun 2005, 02:06:16
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')I believe in the US its still illegal to posess these instruments without "filing".
I don't live in the US.....and didn't spend time on this. However, there's a dedicated forum on the laws involved (again
www.lockpicking101.com) per country breakdown...
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ould you be able to pick locks that quickly after watching a video that came with it.
Just curious is all, as to what ol K had to say was BS or just darn good markmanship
Well, only within
my opinion : no. You'd need to really UNDERSTAND how most common locks work, before you can understand what the video is all about or what the person is trying to do with the tool shown and used. Locks have a few basic requirements, so you need to understand what are the various common methods used (howto's) in order to achieve those requirements (what's). Hence you must know what are the common methods to beat THOSE methods, and what are the tools needed to achieve them.
I can believe K_semlar because I myself have been through that path with that range of timing (he's better though...). Various folks have different results, so the best I could do is quantify it with my own.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SidneyTawl', 'I')MO locks are to prove that someone broke in.

Oh my, I seriously don't think so. A lock most commonly would be just a device with a set of pins pushed by their respective springs. A key would be needed to push each against the springs in different depths, until the surfaces of ALL the pins are level. Then you can turn the lock and open.
And closed again.
K_semlar is right : short of taking apart a cheap lock and examining date/time of when each pin is scraped (how?!? CSI??), there usually isn't one way to do so. Scraping against the pins until all the pins are level is the most common and basic way....but with proper training (self possible), a person could do what real locksmiths do to common locks : pick PIN by PIN. Hardly any scratches even after you take apart the lock.
The scraping against the pins using this method nearly just as good as inserting a key in to unlock, then lock again.
Locks are common and to a layman (non-locksmith trade), it is secure. Once you find out it is not (just like how you discover oil is not well -- PO!), you find out the mechanisms and ways to overcome it, you won't depend on it. We could probably go really down the road discussing quite deep about more protected ways of securing our stuff and alternatives, but that's not the point.
With the know-how, locks can be opened, and closed
without signs of entry. That's the skill of a (official)locksmith/(unofficial)thief.
HTH.
by k_semler » Wed 01 Jun 2005, 02:09:10
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SidneyTawl', '1')2 minutes, are you kidding me. I figure the best I have is under five seconds. For me to make my home that secure for any and all entry points would be unfeasible. Let us know how you can build something that protects your windows and depending on the walls, those also.
If you know the home, finding an entry point to get to an individual is stupid if you only wish to get to the individual.
Protection depends on the enemy.
I can dream can't I? It may not have a purpose, but neither do locks with the proper tools. Good point about the windows and walls. After all, a 7.62 Wolf 123 grain round will penetrat 18 inches of wood before it comes to a complete stop. (I shot 2x4's nailed together.). If they can't get in through the door, they will just break into a window, or mow down the wall. As far as them being after me, I am little worried about that. I would either die defending my life and property, or they would die without taking my stuff. If is more my property that I am worried about. If I get killed, I don't have to worry about the stuff anymore, but it is almost impossible to live without the stuff.
Here Lies the United States Of America.
July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005
Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."
Rest In Peace.
Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
-
k_semler
- Heavy Crude

-
- Posts: 1797
- Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
- Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington
-