Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Locks On House Not Very Secure

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Locks On House Not Very Secure

Unread postby k_semler » Tue 31 May 2005, 18:28:57

I just got my 3 piece lockpick set from an online order from www.lockpicksonline.com and I just tried it on my front door. To open the deadbolt, it took me only 44.36 seconds, and to open the knob, it only took 18.85 seconds. My god! I knew that these tools helped open doors, but doing it in little over a miniute kind of says something about Kwikiset locks. I think I need to invest in a new lock set. My god, now I'm wondering if all home locks are this insecure!
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington

Unread postby TheTurtle » Tue 31 May 2005, 18:39:26

By and large, locks only deter honest folks ... :shock:
User avatar
TheTurtle
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi

Unread postby k_semler » Tue 31 May 2005, 18:45:12

Thank God for Mr. Colt!
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington

Unread postby Jack » Tue 31 May 2005, 18:59:40

Yes, most home locks - and, for that matter, corporate locks - are that insecure. Tubular locks, file cabinet locks, and automobile locks are harder - I've played around with them, without success.

But regular pin and tumbler locks are distressingly easy...
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby k_semler » Tue 31 May 2005, 19:31:29

It just seems that a lock on a door with the proper tools to open it is about as much of a security measure as just shutting your door without locking it, and maybe putting up a sign saying, "Please do not enter, nobody home." Seems kind of futile. But then again, how many people actually have the tools? Not many, I would guess.
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington

Re: Locks On House Not Very Secure

Unread postby Chuckmak » Tue 31 May 2005, 20:18:31

yes...yes they are.
"if god doesn't exist, it is necessary that we invent him" - Voltaire

"they say prescott bush funded hitler" - Nas

Image
Chuckmak
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat 19 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Bridge City

Unread postby rostov » Tue 31 May 2005, 21:05:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('k_semler', 'I')t just seems that a lock on a door with the proper tools to open it is about as much of a security measure as just shutting your door without locking it, and maybe putting up a sign saying, "Please do not enter, nobody home." Seems kind of futile. But then again, how many people actually have the tools? Not many, I would guess.


You'd be surprised. Combine with a hobbyist like myself with a sub-serious trade forum (www.lockpicking101.com) with a LOT of active contributed info on the locksmithing trade, there are actually quite a few. 15 piece Euro or 12 piece US pick set, even those over-hyped all-in-one-tools, Power tools. For various uses -- even automotives, safes.

Add a PO-profile, it can be quite a dangerous (depending on who's side) tool

You're getting quite a good time just using a 3-piece set to open those locks you mentioned, for a beginner.
regards,
Rostov
"Some {} are more equal than others"
User avatar
rostov
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 346
Joined: Sat 29 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Unread postby SidneyTawl » Tue 31 May 2005, 21:17:17

what time would you expect to see on a beginner such as K. or anyone. What kind of learning curve is there to "picking" locks.
User avatar
SidneyTawl
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby RonMN » Tue 31 May 2005, 22:21:15

You'd be amazed at how a properly placed 2X4 can keep your door from opening! 10 X that if you have your foot on the 2X4!!!
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Unread postby Clouseau2 » Tue 31 May 2005, 22:38:28

A window is even easier to "pick". Any rock or brick will do.

And if you don't want to make noise, just use a glass cutter.
User avatar
Clouseau2
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco, CA

Unread postby rostov » Tue 31 May 2005, 23:11:31

<black hat thinking>

Lock picking is NOT so much about using the skills and tools to open a lock and hence gain entry to a point of entry : a gate, a door, a window, etc. It's more of a non-destructive method of doing so that is important.

In a PO extreme-fallout scenario, if you were to scavange for things inside a building and want entry, you won't waste time on a lock. You'd bring the door/window/gate/etc down FAST, finish what you're looking for, then leave with no regard to the destruction of the entry point.

Officially it's supposed to be a non-destructive way of opening entries when the key is lost or trapped within. Unofficially its a sneak method of entry, to ADD UP to the fact that you're accessing a place undetected. i.e. masking your entry and exit. It's a trade you'd seriously need to carry if you're considering a "thief" path in a post-PO world, depending on who's side you're on.

Slight digress : wars are fought in order to gain resources (steal) from one party -- that's quite active. Doesn't this advocate a more passive way of gaining resources (steal) from others?

</black hat thinking>
regards,
Rostov
"Some {} are more equal than others"
User avatar
rostov
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 346
Joined: Sat 29 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Unread postby SidneyTawl » Tue 31 May 2005, 23:44:44

OK Rostov,

I understand the philosophy. my question is rather blunt.

Is the statement by K. something you think is valid or is it BS.

I thought the same thing when he made it, of course I have no knowledge of lock picking.

Would you be able to pick locks that quickly after watching a video that came with it.

I believe in the US its still illegal to posess these instruments without "filing".

Just curious is all, as to what ol K had to say was BS or just darn good markmanship
User avatar
SidneyTawl
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby skiwi » Wed 01 Jun 2005, 00:11:55

No problem HERE at the end of a 100km dead end road :)

Burglary is so rarely thought about in the tiny West Coast town of Karamea when people go out they generally lock the front door - but often forget about the back door.
Let us make him who shall nourish and sustain us. What shall we do to be invoked; to be remembered in the earth.
We have tried with our first creatures but we could not make them venerate us.
So let us try to make obedient respectful beings who shall
User avatar
skiwi
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 673
Joined: Mon 23 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Frost Free in New Zealand

Unread postby k_semler » Wed 01 Jun 2005, 00:27:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rostov', '
')Add a PO-profile, it can be quite a dangerous (depending on who's side) tool


:shock: What do you mean? I am now going to be profiled? Not like my purchases recently would not be grounds to watch me, but I have not engaged in any illegal activities yet, and I do not intend to do so until I am requred to do so in order to survive.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rostov', 'Y')ou're getting quite a good time just using a 3-piece set to open those locks you mentioned, for a beginner.


I wonder if interning under a local locksmith when I was in high school during the "School To Work" program helped me any in this aspect? I'm guessing, it probably did. I still want to be a locksmith, but I have no idea on how to go about it.
Last edited by k_semler on Wed 01 Jun 2005, 00:42:05, edited 1 time in total.
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington

Unread postby k_semler » Wed 01 Jun 2005, 00:39:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SidneyTawl', '
')
Would you be able to pick locks that quickly after watching a video that came with it.

I believe in the US its still illegal to posess these instruments without "filing".

Just curious is all, as to what ol K had to say was BS or just darn good markmanship


I got no video with this set. The only "Tutorial" that was provided by the supplier can be found on thier website which I gave at the beginning of this thread. I can imagine that interning under a local locksmith for 3 moths during my high school "School To Work" program helped me with this greatly. I renember the first time I did it, (with his tools of course), it took me about 5 miniutes per lock. And I can assure you that I am not BSing you. I would have no gain by doing so. I just did my back door in 8.25 seconds. I am going to purchase a new lock for that tomorrow.
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington

Unread postby SidneyTawl » Wed 01 Jun 2005, 00:51:02

Thanks, K

I didn't know. Your statement that you had prior experience made your claim a little easier to swallow.

By the way K, are you trying to protect yourself with the locks or your property.

Locks are no good for those that want in. Locks can be a helpful when you are gone and trust one door only.

However if you're at home then locks, please. You better have something better than that.

Each to their own choice of protection. (and keep it secret, and untraceable)

IMO locks are to prove that someone broke in. 8) 8) 8)
User avatar
SidneyTawl
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby k_semler » Wed 01 Jun 2005, 01:24:41

Note: Just because I am going "line by line" does not mean that I am refuting you, it is just easier for me to post like this. $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SidneyTawl', 'T')hanks, K

I didn't know. Your statement that you had prior experience made your claim a little easier to swallow.


I understand, I would find it hard to believe that someone with no experience could do it with this much speed too. I imagine if I work at it enough, I may someday get fast enough that it is the same speed as a key. I won't count on it anytime soon, but I will sure try! This is fun anyways.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SidneyTawl', 'B')y the way K, are you trying to protect yourself with the locks or your property.


Physical barrier first, lock second, and then Mr. Colt third. If they are intent upon entering my proptery enough to pick the lock, then they deserve to be shot. I don't know about you, but the few times I have knocked on someone's door with no awnser and tried the door only to have it open, I only have yelled "HELLO?? HELLO??" into the entry way, and if no awnser, I leave. If someone enters after that, it is obvious that thier intent is malicious.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SidneyTawl', 'L')ocks are no good for those that want in. Locks can be a helpful when you are gone and trust one door only.


I'll agree with that. Kind of hard to defend my property when I am not home. It still seems though as it is about as effective detterent as just closing the door and saying" Do not enter, Nobody is home" at the door, and hoping they respect my wishes. It kind of sucks knowing that the phycholigical reinforcement of locks on my doors was nothing but that though. It is amazing how insecure standard tumbler locks used on houses are.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SidneyTawl', 'H')owever if you're at home then locks, please. You better have something better than that.


Like what? Computers? Big deal. I can ressurect any Windows system from near death. I still have very little experience with Linux, and I haven't used a mac in 7 years, unless you count an emulated 68040 LC III running MacOS 8.1 on BasiliskII to be experience with a Macintosh. What utility will that give me in a Post PO world. I am not only looking to short term finacial gain, but long term security. A locksmith will always be in demand, but a level 2 IT specialist may not always be.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SidneyTawl', 'E')ach to their own choice of protection. (and keep it secret, and untraceable)

Good idea. I must increase enterance security. At least make it 12:00 miniutes requred to get my door open. Only if they really wanted in would they dedicate that amount of time to opening one door. Otherwise, they would just find a target to enter easier. Although, I do suspect that if they had a lock pick set, and were using it to enter my home 12 miles out of town, they would be damn intent on entering. My best hope I would have is for me to be home so I could end the threat to my property.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SidneyTawl', 'I')MO locks are to prove that someone broke in. 8) 8) 8)[/quote]

How? If they rotate the keyway back to the "lock" position, and lock the door after they leave, there is no way to tell how they entered. After all, they didn't drill in the lock, and no evidence would be immediatly visible that an illegal entry had taken place, (do you feel like tearing down a lock to examine the scraping date on the pins?)
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington
Top

Unread postby SidneyTawl » Wed 01 Jun 2005, 01:59:21

12 minutes, are you kidding me. I figure the best I have is under five seconds. For me to make my home that secure for any and all entry points would be unfeasible. Let us know how you can build something that protects your windows and depending on the walls, those also.

If you know the home, finding an entry point to get to an individual is stupid if you only wish to get to the individual.

Protection depends on the enemy.
User avatar
SidneyTawl
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby rostov » Wed 01 Jun 2005, 02:06:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')I believe in the US its still illegal to posess these instruments without "filing".


I don't live in the US.....and didn't spend time on this. However, there's a dedicated forum on the laws involved (again www.lockpicking101.com) per country breakdown...


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ould you be able to pick locks that quickly after watching a video that came with it.

Just curious is all, as to what ol K had to say was BS or just darn good markmanship


Well, only within my opinion : no. You'd need to really UNDERSTAND how most common locks work, before you can understand what the video is all about or what the person is trying to do with the tool shown and used. Locks have a few basic requirements, so you need to understand what are the various common methods used (howto's) in order to achieve those requirements (what's). Hence you must know what are the common methods to beat THOSE methods, and what are the tools needed to achieve them.

I can believe K_semlar because I myself have been through that path with that range of timing (he's better though...). Various folks have different results, so the best I could do is quantify it with my own.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SidneyTawl', 'I')MO locks are to prove that someone broke in. 8) 8) 8)


Oh my, I seriously don't think so. A lock most commonly would be just a device with a set of pins pushed by their respective springs. A key would be needed to push each against the springs in different depths, until the surfaces of ALL the pins are level. Then you can turn the lock and open.

And closed again.

K_semlar is right : short of taking apart a cheap lock and examining date/time of when each pin is scraped (how?!? CSI??), there usually isn't one way to do so. Scraping against the pins until all the pins are level is the most common and basic way....but with proper training (self possible), a person could do what real locksmiths do to common locks : pick PIN by PIN. Hardly any scratches even after you take apart the lock.

The scraping against the pins using this method nearly just as good as inserting a key in to unlock, then lock again.

Locks are common and to a layman (non-locksmith trade), it is secure. Once you find out it is not (just like how you discover oil is not well -- PO!), you find out the mechanisms and ways to overcome it, you won't depend on it. We could probably go really down the road discussing quite deep about more protected ways of securing our stuff and alternatives, but that's not the point.

With the know-how, locks can be opened, and closed without signs of entry. That's the skill of a (official)locksmith/(unofficial)thief.

HTH.
regards,
Rostov
"Some {} are more equal than others"
User avatar
rostov
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 346
Joined: Sat 29 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand
Top

Unread postby k_semler » Wed 01 Jun 2005, 02:09:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SidneyTawl', '1')2 minutes, are you kidding me. I figure the best I have is under five seconds. For me to make my home that secure for any and all entry points would be unfeasible. Let us know how you can build something that protects your windows and depending on the walls, those also.

If you know the home, finding an entry point to get to an individual is stupid if you only wish to get to the individual.

Protection depends on the enemy.


I can dream can't I? It may not have a purpose, but neither do locks with the proper tools. Good point about the windows and walls. After all, a 7.62 Wolf 123 grain round will penetrat 18 inches of wood before it comes to a complete stop. (I shot 2x4's nailed together.). If they can't get in through the door, they will just break into a window, or mow down the wall. As far as them being after me, I am little worried about that. I would either die defending my life and property, or they would die without taking my stuff. If is more my property that I am worried about. If I get killed, I don't have to worry about the stuff anymore, but it is almost impossible to live without the stuff.
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron