by Lore » Thu 29 Mar 2012, 16:21:38
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Beery1', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', '[')Think it through, where would you get the proper aluminum alloy and tool steal. That same alloy may now be more valuable and have more important uses else ware..
In what? What is more important than the ability to get around? Surely only food and shelter. Once again, we see here the standard bias against the bicycle - "Oh, it's just a toy - it's not important". Before the advent of the automobile, the fastest mode of transport was the bicycle - and that will be the case after the age of oil. In 1942, the bicycle - that mere 'toy' - dealt the British Empire - the greatest empire the world has ever known - its greatest military defeat. In 1975, the bicycle - that mere 'toy' - dealt the USA - arguably the greatest military power the world has ever seen - its biggest military defeat. These defeats happened because one side understood the value of the bicycle, while the other (the losing side) dismissed it as a mere toy. If the Japanese had not used bicycles in Malaya; if the Vietnamese had not used bicycles in Vietnam, the British would probably not have surrendered at Singapore, and the Americans may have won the war in Vietnam.
Trust me - after the age of fossil fuels, the most important use for alloys, other than in farm machinery, will be in bicycles.
The bicycle is not a toy. In a post fossil fuel world, it's a vehicle; it's a military weapon; it's essential for transportation of goods. Those who disbelieve that may find out the truth of it at their cost.
What bias? I happen to own three bicycles myself and ride them often. As I've stated in practical terms, in a low maintenance society, the bicycle will have its place to get to get a person from point A to B, where they can best be used, but I don’t expect them to become the work
of the future.