Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Food Stamp Thread (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: Food stamps

Unread postby Cog » Sat 10 Dec 2011, 09:53:49

We must paddle our own boats from now on. Depending on the government to do so ignores the math of the situation. At current rates of growth, Medicare consumes the entire US federal budget in 15 years. Course, we won't actually get to that point, since the US will collapse under the debt load long before that.

Both Tea Party conservatives with their military spending and progressives with their demands for increased social spending ignore the simple math of trying to do all this in a post-peak world. Not going to happen and if you are relying on the government going forward, you will be sorely disappointed about being lied to.

Ron Paul has the right idea. We shouldn't cut one trillion in deficit spending over 10 years, we should cut one trillion this year. Take our fiscal medicine like a man.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViRZpI2aCkk
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: Food stamps

Unread postby Cloud9 » Sat 10 Dec 2011, 10:28:37

The status quo will crash the currency to save the system and lose both. Ron Paul will crash the system and save the currency.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Food stamps

Unread postby Cog » Sat 10 Dec 2011, 10:46:47

On the theory that half a loaf is better than none, I'll take that deal.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: Food stamps

Unread postby Pretorian » Sat 10 Dec 2011, 11:49:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', '
')Taking from the rich and giving to the poor doesn't work, won't work, and shouldn't be done even if it did work.



If it did, you would support it then, right?
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there

Re: Food stamps

Unread postby vision-master » Sat 10 Dec 2011, 11:52:42

I think cog is saying no.
vision-master
 

Re: Food stamps

Unread postby Cog » Sat 10 Dec 2011, 14:05:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pretorian', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', '
')Taking from the rich and giving to the poor doesn't work, won't work, and shouldn't be done even if it did work.



If it did, you would support it then, right?


As VM stated, No I wouldn't support wealth distribution no matter what social good that could be derived from it would be. I have no right to another's wealth and income. Only a brute takes things by force from others.

I only want the federal government to provide me two things. To enforce and adjudicate legal contracts and to protect me against those who would use force to deprive me of my rights under the Constitution. Anything other than those two things should be provided by the local community of concerned citizenry.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: Food stamps

Unread postby vision-master » Sat 10 Dec 2011, 16:00:17

Like the pay $75 a year for the fire department in Tennesee otherwise if your house burns down, too bad?

Next will be, you want police protection - pay your yearly fee......
vision-master
 

Re: Food stamps

Unread postby Cid_Yama » Sat 10 Dec 2011, 16:03:52

No. Next comes the police come bust up your stuff if you don't pay protection money. We were there before.
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it." - Patrick Henry

The level of injustice and wrong you endure is directly determined by how much you quietly submit to. Even to the point of extinction.
User avatar
Cid_Yama
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian

Re: Food stamps

Unread postby Cog » Sat 10 Dec 2011, 16:18:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', 'L')ike the pay $75 a year for the fire department in Tennesee otherwise if your house burns down, too bad?

Next will be, you want police protection - pay your yearly fee......


I do not have a constitutional right to fire protection. Only in your world are such things rights. If I lived in that area I would most likely buy the fire protection since it would be stupid not to. But freedom to be stupid is still freedom rather than the slavery imposed by taxation.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: Food stamps

Unread postby basil_hayden » Sat 10 Dec 2011, 16:45:25

Does the right to eat exceed the right to protect profits?

The Declaration of Independence mentions life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

I think life requires food, water and air.

You want more liberty but to what extent do we protect the fortunate few's right to the pursuit of hapiness in a rigged system?
User avatar
basil_hayden
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1581
Joined: Mon 08 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: CT, USA

Re: Food stamps

Unread postby Cog » Sat 10 Dec 2011, 20:21:34

Try as I might, I can find no enumerated right to eat in the Constitution. What I do find inferred in the Constitution is the right to be left alone by the government to pursue my ambitions within the constraints of law.

If I do not wish to eat today, I am content that no one forces me to do so. Maybe I'm not hungry or am on a diet. Furthermore, your desire to eat today confers no obligation on my part to make is happen. You may ask me to give you money to buy food if you wish and I might oblige if I desire. Or perhaps you can elect those people who desire to use the US Treasury's revenues for that purpose. I am free to vote against those people. Its a win situation for all concerned.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: Food stamps

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Sun 11 Dec 2011, 00:38:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'T')ry as I might, I can find no enumerated right to eat in the Constitution. What I do find inferred in the Constitution is the right to be left alone by the government to pursue my ambitions within the constraints of law.

If I do not wish to eat today, I am content that no one forces me to do so. Maybe I'm not hungry or am on a diet. Furthermore, your desire to eat today confers no obligation on my part to make is happen. You may ask me to give you money to buy food if you wish and I might oblige if I desire. Or perhaps you can elect those people who desire to use the US Treasury's revenues for that purpose. I am free to vote against those people. Its a win situation for all concerned.


Interestingly, one of the most militant antifederalists, Thomas Paine, also suggested a guaranteed federal income equal to something like $15,000 in today's money.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Food stamps

Unread postby Cog » Sun 11 Dec 2011, 01:11:22

I'll see your Thomas Paine and raise you a Thomas Jefferson:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') think myself that we have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious.


Or this:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')o take from one because it is thought that his own industry and that of his father’s has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association—the guarantee to every one of a free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan
Top

Re: Food stamps

Unread postby Loki » Sun 11 Dec 2011, 01:32:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'T')ry as I might, I can find no enumerated right to eat in the Constitution.

I also see no enumerated right to bridges. Yet you bridge-building engineer mooches keep robbing my wealth.

Cog, I'll IM you with details on how you can return the money you mooched from me.
A garden will make your rations go further.
User avatar
Loki
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon
Top

Re: Food stamps

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Sun 11 Dec 2011, 02:07:39

There are a lot of good online references about enumerated rights and the Bill Of Rights. i just ordered a book on the states ratification debates. Clearly the antifederalists considered the Constitution to be a strongly federalist document, or they would not have insisted on a Bill Of Rights to balance it. Later of course the Federalists would become the Republicans.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Food stamps

Unread postby Shaved Monkey » Sun 11 Dec 2011, 03:09:40

If we were to see the scrapping of food stamps as Cog suggests
You will certainly see a rapid increase in the employment opportunities in all aspects of the security industry and the funeral industry.
I would imagine more taxes might need to spent on the police force,prison and judicial system though.
Ready to turn Zombies into WWOOFers
User avatar
Shaved Monkey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2578
Joined: Wed 30 Mar 2011, 01:43:28

Re: Food stamps

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Sun 11 Dec 2011, 03:15:13

As it is, I think we are going to see dramatic decreases in life expectancy over the next decade.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Food stamps

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sun 11 Dec 2011, 03:31:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'I') see.

So we need more welfare state to prevent more welfare state? Sometimes your illogically formed statements defy any effort to unscramble them.


No.. the welfare state is only necessary because the People are so poor. That's perfectly logical, Cog. Just like revolutionary France, "let them eat cake" was a funny quip but fact remained the People were hungry because the rich had it all the damn money.

I know what you'd really like to see -- those who can't afford bread don't eat. That's Libertarianism. But in reality, modern Western governments aren't just going to let people starve -- it's a Big Ag support if nothing else Cog, just like the school lunch program. If the vampire squid rich suck all the money out of the system and hoard it in paper Forex games and Zynga Farmville stock, then money must come from somewhere to feed people.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')aking from the rich and giving to the poor doesn't work, won't work, and shouldn't be done even if it did work.


Yeah whatever, Reaganomics and trickledown, that's what you're saying. Bottom line.. rich have all the money, it's got to be redistributed somehow. A frickin consumer market can't even work Cog if the shoppers don't have enough money.

This can be easily accomplished -- tariffs, bring jobs back, double the minimum wage to therefore raise all wages. TAX THE RICH just like we did in the 1960s.. you could tax them 90% just like the 60's, life would go on just as it did in the 1950s and 1960s. We would have fewer billionaires sure, but in their place there would be a broad middle class and working class with livable wages.

(we needn't even be as radical as 1950s America, we could just be a bit more like Canada or Australia the poor and working class here would be able to afford their own food again.. but whatever, let's do another thirty years of Reaganomics and wind up with 200 million on government food)
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Food stamps

Unread postby Cog » Sun 11 Dec 2011, 06:55:16

Doubling the minimum wage would result in the immediate firing of even more of the people you seem to care about. It would raise prices for everything minimum wage people produce, hitting the poorest people the hardest. Jobs would not be coming back here. They would be leaving in droves to overseas shores.

Bottom line is, its not the government's affair what I pay my workers. They are free to leave if they don't like the pay. Getting rid of the minimum wage sounds like a capital idea to me. Given the service I get at McDonalds, its clear the workers are vastly over-payed as is. Freedom to choose for all.

The world has fundamentally changed and taxing the wealthy is just another class envy dream to bring others down to your level.

More Jefferson because he can not be quoted enough:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan
Top

Re: Food stamps

Unread postby Shaved Monkey » Sun 11 Dec 2011, 09:46:58

Australia's minimum wage is $15.51 per hour or $589.30 per week
Unemployment is 5.3%
Unemployed get rental assistance and $486.80 a fortnight(as a single)
Plus free Medical for everyone
seems to work ok here
Ready to turn Zombies into WWOOFers
User avatar
Shaved Monkey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2578
Joined: Wed 30 Mar 2011, 01:43:28

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron