Waking up to the news on NPR this morning, they were commenting on the Goldman Sachs analysis of the possibility of $105 oil. It is so strange that they can go through an entire piece like this without actually talking about the concept of peak oil.
The news in America has this way of obscuring the larger picture by speaking solely about "the American way of life" and framing all stories in this context.
In this case it means that instead of following up on the consequences of oil prices doubling worldwide, they narrow the discussion to how American gas prices may shoot up to be more in line with those in Europe.
Well now that doesn't sound too bad does it? So people will switch from SUV's to smaller european style cars and start wearing beret's and it will all be cool... daddio.
What the hell? Can anyone help me get a fix on what portion of the consequences of oil peaking will be manifested as rising gas prices? I suspect in the overall scheme this will be the least of our worries. Mainstream media seems to be unable to see the problem as anything greater than "rising consumer prices at the pump," promping such equally hackneyed responses as "well honey I guess we'll have to do some belt tightening," or some nonsense.
There is a certain kind of American smugness and primacy that is shown in the coverage of world events by the American media, where everything is twisted up and retold as the unfolding drama of the American people. They regress so easily into preciousness verging on babytalk. It reached a bizarre pitch after Sept 11th, with local paper headlines pleading "Why Do They Hate Us So?"
Here is a classic of the genre from USA today (drifting from peak oil here - but not in the larger sense):
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/200 ... ion-_x.htm
What?!?! Foreing pollution invading OUR air? Obscuring the view at our National Parks? Why, that chinese smog may dim my awe of the fluttering American Flag, yonder.
OK, done with the rant for now.