by AgentR11 » Sun 23 Oct 2011, 17:05:10
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Loki', 'T')he "conservative" answer to social inequality and educational hyperinflation seems to be "I'm rich, what's your problem?" It's no wonder so many young people find this to be a morally bankrupt position.
I really don't see how my answer was bankrupt. There is a clear path for the unsupported, poor, but well talented 18yr old to achieve a BA/BS without massive debt.
There are however, a few things that are bothering me about this thread, and perhaps have enhanced the problem.
Why does a high school diploma mean so little?
Why do lower income, modestly intelligent kids believe they need a 4 yr college degree?
Why do non-debutants / non eternally-impoverished-artists seek degrees in Art, English, xyzCategory Studies?
My biggest complaint is really with the first question, it feeds EVERYTHING. Because it is easy, and uniformly expected and achievable, it has become worthless. Other advanced countries have no hesitancy about pulling Bob with good hands and 100 IQ, and telling him, "hey, the academics in 11th and 12th grade will crush you like a bug, but we also have trade skill programs A,B & C that your tests tell us you will do well in." Nor do they hesitate to tell the slacking 140 IQ dweeb that he needs to get his tail in gear and put his name on the sign up lists for the tough courses, even the ones he might hate, because you will be tested, and failure = janitor. 95%+ high school graduation rate is not a success, its an enormous failure. I don't know how to fix this; we are so far in to the entitlement mentality, everyone thinks they deserve everything. Its not fair that Jane came out of the box just simply more able than Bob; trying to cover it up with a pile of sameness just makes all the same, worth nothing.
If we did this, there really would be scholarship money for the slacking 140 IQ lower class kid to chase, and he could win it on talent alone. There also wouldn't be a long stream of average kids going to JimJones Technical Institute at the cost of huge debt to learn what the state school program should have taught them in the first place. They should hit their 18th birthday with solid basic skills in welding, or plumbing, or whatever; ready to be picked up and put to work. I also believe that if we taught them stuff that was relevant; they wouldn't blow off the history or basic math we wanted to teach them too; because THEIR diploma (with trade skill endorsement) would be worth having.