by GoIllini » Thu 13 Oct 2011, 11:33:01
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('highlander', 'T')he cost of energy from your hoped for escape from consequences of our lifestyle choices is way too high. I suppose we could build a nuke plant or 30 over the deposits to supply the energy needed to extract the oil to meet our transportation needs, but that seems quite unlikely.
Shale gas can be produced at an EROEI of 70 and we have 100 years of it. Yes, we will run out sooner with exponential growth. But with electric cars coming out, that buys us some time to switch cars over to the grid and eventually get fusion working- or better yet, extraterrestrial solar collection- sustainable for 5 billion years and exponentially growable for thousands- if we can get a space elevator working.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e made good choices in the 70's that led to conservation, but we are getting away from them in our fascination with high tech gadgets. We have not made necessary improvements to the grid to support wind and solar, and we have a 60's mindset when it comes to horsepower in our vehicles.
Not necessarily true. The US consumes 10% less oil today than it did five years ago and ten years ago. Cars get better mileage. The oil intensity of the economy has come down dramatically.
$3/gallon gas is enough to start getting folks to conserve. $5/gallon gas is enough to get them to switch to electric cars.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hile deflation is the right outcome, inflation is in the best interest of debtor nations. It has always been the path chosen. the end of that road has almost always been war. Fasten your seatbelts, it is about to get interesting.