by Googolplex » Fri 27 May 2005, 07:47:32
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Raxozanne', 'T')his is the whole point over and over again.
yes we can work and eat without oil
but the big question I suppose that is hashed and rehased by all this is that:
Will the prices rise so suddenly that the present infrastructure will just collapse causing chaos?
Or will there be enough time to change the infrastructure in a progressive way?
Possibly.
Probably not.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Raxozanne', 'W')ell, the oil depletion experts are calling on governments to recognise the problem of peak oil and therefore plan a strategy of decline, sustainability and relocalisation in line with oil depletion.
But here is the problem: Governments do not seem what to recognise peak oil or are going by USGS figures of a peak in oil in 2030.
Therefore what we really need is a large detailed audit on how much oil we have left which is why we need to get someone in to audit OPEC. Hopefully OPEC will let someone in soon.
In this way a definite date can be given to peak oil, government will be forced to face facts and societies will have a better chance of pulling through without trouble.
What does all this have to do with what we were discussing in this thread? Lets try to keep things on topic. This thread represents a specific topic of discussion (coal, gas, and nuclear as transport fuels) in a specific section (Energy Technology) in the Peak Oil forums. Your post doesn't even fit in this
, much less pertain to this thread. Probably belongs in the Basics or Peak Oil Discussion sections.