by Oakley » Mon 22 Aug 2011, 09:54:33
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AdTheNad', '
')This post answers a couple of questions I didn't get round to asking yet, but leaves a couple of things unclear for me.
It seems you favour a small government that is stronger than any corporation, and to achieve that you want to ensure that corporations don't exist. Is that a fair representation? My views generally are, that I favour a government stronger than any corporation, so the bigger corporations get, the bigger the government has to be, to maintain control. We currently have big corporations who make the laws, which is the worst of both worlds. I think we probably both believe there should be independence between gov and business to avoid corruption, with an emphasis on laws that are best for everyone, not just the benefit of the connected few?
So, which is better, a world with no corporations, or one where a government grows in relation to the size of corporations? That's a tricky question with many things to consider. The problem is, I hate corruption, which large gov and corps lead to, but I do like my iPhone and Xbox, which I don't believe would exist without companies as large as Apple and Microsoft. Any comments on this implication to a world without large corps?
Corporations require laws that allow for their creation. Simple change the laws and prohibit government from creating corporations or allowing existing corporations to operate. With a phasing in of such laws corporations would be forced to sell their assets and the remaining possible forms for businesses to take would be partnerships and sole proprietorships, and because of the nature of these organizations their sizes would be naturally limited. This would effectively break up the concentration of wealth now held by corporations and distributed it into much smaller entities, automatically creating more competition. It would not preclude the invention or all the goodies that you like, and might even bring them forth more quickly without the inherent and stifling bureaucracy in big corporations.
Given that we have more government now than we have ever had in the history of the US, tell me if big government has worked to prevent the predatory practices of big corporations or has government joined with the big corporations to plunder and control the public. I think human nature being what it is, if power exist it is abused, and this is why the best system is one where power is not concentrated in the hands of the few. Ideally, people should possess power over their own individual lives and it is only when they use their own power to commit acts of aggression against others that we collectively, through government, use power to thwart and punish their aggression.
Corporations are a problem created by government and then instead of going to the root of the problem and denying government the power to create corporations, you suggest that we address the results with even more destructive government intrusion into the economy. If a physician took such an approach of treating the symptoms and not the disease, I think he would have a terrible rate of success with his patients.