Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Jim Rogers Thread (merged)

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Jim Rogers: Saudi Arabia lying, can't increase productio

Postby seahorse3 » Thu 14 Jul 2011, 09:19:05

Oil, unfortunately you are here to argue a position regardless of facts, not to try to understand the truth. That's evident by your statement that even if SA produced the data the peakers/doomers wouldn't believe them. In this statement, you assume the data would be optimistic and you categorize people with class "left/right" labels. That is a classic illogical argument ad hominem. This is the problem I have with you and many others on the board, and why I frequent it less often. I come back because there have been a few, only a few posters over the years, that I think are hear to ascertain the facts and form opinions based on the facts, not form an opinion and cherry pick facts to support it. One of the current fair posters is Pup and I believe Rocdock falls into that category as well.

Back to the SA thread, there have been many posters here over the years who have worked in the oil industry. One in particular living in Europe (who no longer posts here) said that he was quite confident that all SA oil production data could easily fit on a "floppy" or however he termed it and was most likely smuggled out long ago and in the hands of most major world govt's. I always thought that interesting and most likely very true. So, if true, the recent IEA action becomes more meaningful.

As a layman, I've always taken the position that if someone were the big kid on the block, aka SA and its oil production, it would have no reason to keep it a state secret. It would flaunt it, just as the US flaunts its military firepower and nuclear power.
seahorse3
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Tue 01 Mar 2011, 16:14:13

Re: Jim Rogers: Saudi Arabia lying, can't increase productio

Postby copious.abundance » Thu 14 Jul 2011, 12:34:48

seahorse, obviously not "all" peakers here would distrust data coming out from KSA, I apologize if I pigeonholed you or anyone else into any group. That said, it's obvious to me a lot of people on this forum would distrust anything the Saudis said - especially if it showed their production going back up to previous record levels. This is the same crowd who thinks KSA is lying about their reserves, about their spare capacity and ability to pump more oil, etc. etc. For people like this, it makes no difference whether the data is coming from the Saudis themselves or from independent groups; if it shows what they don't want to see, they refuse to believe it.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: Jim Rogers: Saudi Arabia lying, can't increase productio

Postby seahorse3 » Thu 14 Jul 2011, 14:30:05

Oil, thanks for your reply. And I agree, many would argue with the figures if SA put them out.

Here's where I differ on some of the more optimistic view points, which is equating reserve additions to production. Many optimistic view points cite increasing reserve additions to meaning there will not be a peak in oil production. I disagree. There is no question that reserves grow. The US is a prime example. US reserves have increased but production has decreased (since the Hubbert peak***). So, reservers and production are related but not the same. The same should hold true for Opec. So although Opec increased their reserves, it doesn't necessarily mean increased production. SA shows that. SA has increased their reserve figures, just as the US did, but SA production has actually dropped since 1980, just as the US dropped.

Now, the question has been why has SA production dropped since 1980? Some argue its bc of increasing decline rates (just like the US), others like Rockdoc say SA adjusted production down based on market conditions. I have a tendency to believe its more related to decline rates and not market conditions, bc the world demand and prices justify increased production. However, I understand you and others disagree with that position. The truth is, no one knows yet, but the problem remains, the world needs increasing energy production to grow.

As you point out, NG production is growing, but unfortunately the world isn't using it for much yet and still flaring it. We ignore people like Pickens who, rightfully in my opinion, say it should be used in commercial trucking.

***I understand US production has increased lately but still not reached its alltime highs. I'm all for increasing production, but remain cautiously skeptical that the new oil plays can bring the US back above its peak***

I do think peak oil issues can be ameliorated other than by simply crushing the economy (aka demand destruction). For example, switching commercial trucking to NG as proposed by Boone Pickens. However, instead of being proactive to a perceived problem, we seem to be incapable of reacting, collectively, proactively. In the end, it seems it will take a financial crisis to get people to make a shift.
seahorse3
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Tue 01 Mar 2011, 16:14:13

Re: Jim Rogers: Saudi Arabia lying, can't increase productio

Postby rockdoc123 » Thu 14 Jul 2011, 16:58:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ll these giant fields were discovered and produced before 1968, most date back to the 30's and 40's. They are old tired and depleted


Incorrect. A number of these fields ( Khurais, Khusaniyah, Safaniya, Manifa, Shaybah) are not depleted. They were produced for a period then shutin and are most recently benefiting from MRC wells, SMART completions etc. they are no where near depleted.
According to papers in the SPE even fields like Abqaiq and Qatif have 15% - 20% of original recoverable still remaining.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')iscoveries since the mid-60's have been relatively tiny.

this plot is very misleading as it infers Ghawar is one continous field, which it isn't by the strictest definition.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00

Jim Rogers: US never scraped out of 2008 depression

Postby timmac » Mon 08 Aug 2011, 00:22:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he United States' prized top AAA credit rating has been cut for the first time ever. Standard & Poor's has dropped America's ranking to AA+. Asian investors are getting cagey on the back of what's been a tough week for America's economy. Jim Rogers says they're ditching bonds.



http://youtu.be/JQqF37v_UYk
User avatar
timmac
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Las Vegas

Re: Jim Rogers: US never scraped out of 2008 depression

Postby FloridaGirl » Mon 08 Aug 2011, 01:44:11

If you subtract out the Federal Reserve's printed money from the GDP, it's clear that we did not get out of a recession. For the first 6 months of this year, subtracting the Federal Reserves Treasury Purchases (about 9% annual rate of GDP) from the growth of GDP (about .9% annual rate of GDP) yields a decline in GDP of a 8% annual rate.

And you would expect that the printed money would get counted multiple times in the GDP. The Federal Reserve buys Treasuries which the government pays somebody with, then that person buys something and so on. Bernanke must be flabbergasted that the economy is still getting worse despite that big of a money injection.
User avatar
FloridaGirl
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 165
Joined: Wed 30 May 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Jim Rogers: US never scraped out of 2008 depression

Postby pup55 » Mon 08 Aug 2011, 05:42:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f you subtract out the Federal Reserve's printed money from the GDP, it's clear that we did not get out of a recession.


That's because that money never actually got into the economy. It went directly from the treasury into the accounts of the largest banks in the country in order to keep them from imploding, and it was only marginally successful at that.

But, with the exception of Bernie Madoff, no one went to jail, no one was prosecuted, there were no negative consequences, and it is pretty clear that even the greatest "do over" in world economic history was probably not enough because of the way it favored the banks rather than the people at the consumer level.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Jim Rogers: US never scraped out of 2008 depression

Postby americandream » Mon 08 Aug 2011, 07:19:40

Jim Rogers. Now there's a rare one. An American capitalist who loves "communist" China.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Jim Rogers: Saudi Arabia lying, can't increase productio

Postby copious.abundance » Wed 10 Aug 2011, 14:34:45

It would be nice to have Jim Rogers chime in on this thread someday.

LINK
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')UGUST 10, 2011, 8:16 A.M. ET
IEA: Saudi Oil Production In July Highest For 30 Years

LONDON (Dow Jones)--OPEC kingpin Saudi Arabia's oil production in July reached its highest level in three decades, averaging 9.8 million barrels a day, the International Energy Agency said Wednesday.

This is because the Saudis have stepped in to replace around 70% of the oil production shut down by the Libyan civil war, the IEA said in its monthly oil market report.

The kingdom has increased oil output by 1.1 million barrels a day since the outbreak of hostilities in Libya, it said.

"The last time Saudi Arabia produced around the 10 million barrel a day mark was in 1981, after the Kingdom had earlier surged output to offset lost supplies from Iran following the fall of the Shah," the IEA said.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia
Top

Re: Jim Rogers: Saudi Arabia lying, can't increase productio

Postby copious.abundance » Wed 10 Aug 2011, 21:10:37

^
Rogers never said Saudi would meet or surpass 10mbpd, he said they would never be able to increase production by 1 million bpd. They have. He was wrong.

I just viewed the whole interview. This guy is actually pretty clueless. He's calling for a rise in both the US dollar *and* commodities - *all* commodities. Makes no sense. When the dollar goes up commodities mostly go down, and vice-versa.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'J')im Rogers joins Zero Hedge in being highly skeptical about just how credible Saudi's call for a 1MM + boost in its oil supply is: "Saudi Arabia has been lying about the reserves for decades. Saudi Arabia the last two times said they are going to increase production and they couldn't increase production. Don't fall for that. The reason oil is going up is the world is running out of known reserves of oil."
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/jim-rogers-saudi-arabia-lying-about-being-able-increase-its-oil-production

So what's the truth here.. is this another empty promise, or can Saudi Arabia actually increase production (other than just tapping into stored reserves).
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia
Top

Re: Jim Rogers: Saudi Arabia lying, can't increase productio

Postby americandream » Wed 10 Aug 2011, 22:39:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'I') just viewed the whole interview. This guy is actually pretty clueless. He's calling for a rise in both the US dollar *and* commodities - *all* commodities. Makes no sense. When the dollar goes up commodities mostly go down, and vice-versa.
You've obviously never experienced stagflation. What he describes and you are about to witness is exactly that. We become poorer AND we become poorer, as demand decreases and prices increase.


Why do you think that China's currency shadows the US dollar? In essence you are buying deflating goods (yes, Chinese imports will continue to deflate) within the context of a static exchange dynamic despite the inflationary tendency of the dollar. Which is why China will continue to play such a core role in the welfare of America's elite with no real change in the status quo.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Jim Rogers: Saudi Arabia lying, can't increase productio

Postby Daniel_Plainview » Thu 11 Aug 2011, 02:14:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]IEA: Saudi Oil Production In July Highest For 30 Years


What percentage of that is light/sweet? If you're going to compare apples to apples over a 30-year period, you cannot blindly substitute today's heavy/sour for the light/sweet that predominated 30 years ago.
User avatar
Daniel_Plainview
Prognosticator
Prognosticator
 
Posts: 4220
Joined: Tue 06 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: 7035 Hollis ... Near the Observatory ... Just down the way, tucked back in the small woods
Top

Previous

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron