Oil, unfortunately you are here to argue a position regardless of facts, not to try to understand the truth. That's evident by your statement that even if SA produced the data the peakers/doomers wouldn't believe them. In this statement, you assume the data would be optimistic and you categorize people with class "left/right" labels. That is a classic illogical argument ad hominem. This is the problem I have with you and many others on the board, and why I frequent it less often. I come back because there have been a few, only a few posters over the years, that I think are hear to ascertain the facts and form opinions based on the facts, not form an opinion and cherry pick facts to support it. One of the current fair posters is Pup and I believe Rocdock falls into that category as well.
Back to the SA thread, there have been many posters here over the years who have worked in the oil industry. One in particular living in Europe (who no longer posts here) said that he was quite confident that all SA oil production data could easily fit on a "floppy" or however he termed it and was most likely smuggled out long ago and in the hands of most major world govt's. I always thought that interesting and most likely very true. So, if true, the recent IEA action becomes more meaningful.
As a layman, I've always taken the position that if someone were the big kid on the block, aka SA and its oil production, it would have no reason to keep it a state secret. It would flaunt it, just as the US flaunts its military firepower and nuclear power.





