Forbes, IMO, writes LOTS of crappy articles. With access to the web, I can't fathom WHY ANYONE with a brain would subscribe it. (Perhaps hard right wingers who want to hear Steve Forbes' point of view, I guess).
There are LOTS of mediocre (or worse) cheap financial magazines around like "Money", "Business Week", "Forbes", etc, etc, etc. For the beginner before the internet age -- yeah, I read two of these for a few years in the 80's.
Now?
If you can afford reasonable quality, "The Economist" and "The WSJ" (despite increasing quality problems and an inherently super-right-wing editorial slant) puts these rags so badly to shame that it's just astounding to me that they stay in business.
Now, if they'd adopt a hard LEFT point of view so the Obama aministration would want to subsidize them to "save or create jobs", THEN I would understand their business model...

Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.