by AgentR11 » Tue 17 May 2011, 09:55:45
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', 'S')ure there are rational tools to verify the hypothesis.
If there are, your chain of tests doesn't even address the hypothesis. You are addressing the "consciousness" state of the brain. My hypothesis concerning spiritual life in no way requires any capability of the brain, including consciousness. And thats sorta the problem. We can certainly say that the brain stops functioning at death, and its function that we term consciousness ceases; however, that doesn't tell us anything about the suggested hypothesis concerning a spiritual life. It does however reveal the sort of axioms the tester chooses associate with the term "spiritual life".
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')iven it takes energy to run the brain.
The brain can also be described in terms of entropy.
The second law of thermodynamics states that in general the total entropy of any system will not decrease other than by increasing the entropy of some other system.
However the brain itself violates this law.
A vegetable brain from someone who is alive but brain dead uses the same amount of energy as conscious self aware brain
But the vegetable brain is in a state of higher entropy than the conscious brain
For this to be true there must be an overunity of energy present in the conscious brain that is not present in the vegetable brain
Conclusively the difference in entropy is evidence of the spirit
The brain is *not* a closed system. Basically the above chain fails because you have failed to show that systems outside the brain do not undergo a balancing change; and in point of fact, the brain and sugar metabolism being as inefficient as they are, it is most certainly true that the difference in entropy between vegetative and conscious state is easily accounted for in the basic chain of metabolism. 2nd law doesn't require the forms to be similar, you just have to account for the entropy in whichever bucket it finds itself.