by americandream » Sun 22 Aug 2010, 05:06:35
Although I would agree that latter day thoughts on the approaching confluence of the capitalist economy and its resourcing base perhaps misunderstand the nature of the challenge, there is a distinction between what we would like happen and what will happen given the objective forces at play, forces such as the survival instinct and the contextual role played by culture.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'I')t has to happen at some point after all -- it's not like mysteries are infinite, eventually humanity must discover pretty much everything.
Have you ever considered that possibility, that most of the ground breaking "brand new" discoveries have been made? I think that's pretty safe to say as far as most of the fundamental laws of nature. Although on the quantum side there's certainly a lot yet to be discovered (the whole reason for the LHC).
I would be careful with assertions regarding "discovery of everything".
Certainly everything major from "big physics" related to our everyday life have been already discovered.
However fundamental issues about workings of Universe are still remaining elusive and some more fundamental laws explaining how Universe is working are still waiting to be discovered, albeit it may simply prove to be impossible task.
However eventual discovering of such laws will have no impact whatsoever on our technological progress.
Resources to make practical use of such laws will remain inaccessible for ever.
We won't play with particles of energies exceeding 10 E19 GeV (so called Planck energy) where some fundamentally new physics trashing Relativity and QM could show up.
To do so our LHC would have to grow to size of our Galaxy.
As per LHC, there are plenty of thrilling possibilities what might be discovered there or not but any new exotic particles found there will not find any practical uses.
Project is just a nice esoteric exercise aimed at discovering new, exciting but practically useless knowledge.
This knowledge will still remain in framework of Relativity and QM though.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')y point here is that a slowing pace of fundamentally new discovery, with only advances in technology remaining, isn't necessarily a bad thing. It could just mean we've got most of the basics covered already.
Save some possible collapse of entire high tech sector due to economic difficulties I expect some further progress in genetics, medicine, IT and nanotech perhaps.
There may be room for substantial progress in said areas but even there all fundamental discoveries are already made.
We know how DNA works, Information Theory is also mature field etc.
What do I expect in coming future?
You know that I am rather pessimist here.
I observe that we are reluctant to apply
known science, say one related to climate change.
We have probably driven environment destruction beyond certain tipping points and in coming centuries we are going to be busy with direct survival issues so there may be not much room to practice high tech.
I observe a number of detrimental changes in workings of our society.
- Entitlement culture.
- Decadent education system which is failing bright kids to serve political correctness
- Financial recklessness and faulty economic model
- Decay of sound governing practices
- Triumph of
quantity over
quality.
- Reluctance to act to avert environmental degradation
- Expectations of immediate reward (lack of long term strategic planning).
etc.
These are qualities of failing setups. Western civilization is walking zombie at the moment.
It is not reformable and failure is its destiny.
Once it is gone there will be nothing to miss.
I don't remember on which movie following phrase was used but it seems to describe well our current situation:
"Future does not compute".