THE Saddam Hussein Thread (merged)

by **0mar** » Fri 20 May 2005, 13:03:19

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7917696/ This is quite eerie considering that if you've read Monte's book (Madmen at the Helm), he talks about this happening.

by **stu** » Fri 20 May 2005, 13:09:49

You'll have to refresh my memory on what Monte said Omar. Would also help the people who have not read his book.

by **jawrat** » Fri 20 May 2005, 14:24:33

holy crap! between the newsweek thing and now this....wow, they're (CFR) realllllly workin the media to distract the sheeple from the real issues.

curiouser and curiouser...

by **lorenzo** » Fri 20 May 2005, 15:12:19

It's amazing to see how both the yanks and the brits know everything about Saddam's underwear, but are too s!ssy to discuss the illegality of their war, the lies which led to it, and the billions of theft committed by their leaders.

Truly amazing. Surreal.

by **0mar** » Fri 20 May 2005, 23:45:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('stu', 'Y')ou'll have to refresh my memory on what Monte said Omar. Would also help the people who have not read his book.

by **Tapas** » Sat 21 May 2005, 00:40:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jawrat', 'h')oly crap! between the newsweek thing and now this....wow, they're (CFR) realllllly workin the media to distract the sheeple from the real issues.

curiouser and curiouser...

by **k_semler** » Sat 21 May 2005, 03:29:17

Saddam in his skivvies? Pfft! :razz:

I see more skin than that while at work! :lol:

Seriously, I do. Some paitents disrobe themselves for no appearant reason.

by **smallpoxgirl** » Sat 21 May 2005, 04:02:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('k_semler', 'S')addam in his skivvies? Pfft! :razz:

I see more skin than that while at work! :lol:

Seriously, I do. Some paitents disrobe themselves for no appearant reason.

by **bobcousins** » Sat 21 May 2005, 07:07:03

I didn't realise wearing underwear was a sexual perversion.

Oh dear, more NWO conspiracy nonsense.

by **PlannerBee** » Sat 21 May 2005, 11:53:53

Gosh. I hope Saddam isn't upset by that picture. He looked pretty good for a sixty-eight year old man. Maybe he works out. :-D

by **frankthetank** » Sat 21 May 2005, 12:43:06

This is just stupid...more nonsense to keep people from the real news.

by **Tapas** » Sat 21 May 2005, 13:35:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('frankthetank', 'T')his is just stupid...more nonsense to keep people from the real news.

by **Free** » Sat 21 May 2005, 17:56:09

It's just disgusting. I bet even the worst enemy of George W. Bush won't want to see him in underpants after he will be convicted in The Hague...

by **vegasmade** » Sat 21 May 2005, 18:19:35

I always figured Sadaam was a boxers guy. haha
And lorenzo, come on man. They don't need to talk about it, they wave it in our face with this type of garbage. They've set the American people up to be hated and they'll dance off into the sunset while we're stuck fending off the raving hoardes. I'm not saying we can't be blamed, at large, for our complacency, but half of us didn't vote for the neo-nuttsos. We have stood by as this administration has alienated us from the world, and mark my words- when the heads role, the Dubya possie will have gotten the hell out of Dodge.

by **k_semler** » Sat 21 May 2005, 21:12:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'M')aybe I'm gonna regret askin this, but what kind of work do you do KS? Didn't picture you taking care of "patients".

by **EnemyCombatant** » Sun 22 May 2005, 09:44:26

They must be coloring his hair? Right!

http://kurtnimmo.com/blog/index.php?p=670

by **vegasmade** » Mon 23 May 2005, 07:37:16

The linked blog raises a very interesting memory of mine. About four years ago I worked for an Iraqii. He grew up there during the Iraq/Iran war and often spoke about the numerous doubles. With the billions the real Sadaam made looting his country, I'd be amazed if he wasn't gone long before our invasion. I was told his sons had doubles as well. They probably haven't been in country for years. The poor schmuck in the hole was probably hiding because he couldn't afford to get his face fixed back. This whole thing's been a sham since day one! It's all crap!

by **Jake_old** » Wed 19 Oct 2005, 09:53:25

He's questioning the legitimacy of the court as it has been set up under US occupation. Understandable.

The Independence of Iraqi judges. Understandable paranioa.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')raqi officials say the only charge against Saddam Hussein, so far, is the killing of more than 140 men in the mostly Shia village of Dujail after a failed 1982 assassination attempt against him.

Mr Ani told the BBC that the defence will argue that those killed had been found guilty under Iraq's laws and Saddam's only role was to sign their death warrants - in the same way that George W Bush signed 152 death warrants while he was governor of Texas

by **PenultimateManStanding** » Wed 19 Oct 2005, 15:46:15

President Jalal Talabani has announced that he will not sign a death warrant for Saddam. The Kurds are relectant to piss off the Sunnis. Maybe they could just bring him over here to the US and he could be made a cellmate of Manuel Noriega. The two of them could while away the days talking about the good old days when they had absolute power before Uncle Sam brought them down.

by **Free** » Wed 19 Oct 2005, 15:52:13

The only thing that worried me is that I read that the remaining 11 accusation maybe won't be discussed before court if he is found guilty (and sentenced to death) on the first one...

How convenient! So all the dirt from the time when he shook hands with Rumsfeld stays under the carpet...

Well, maybe there will be a "Jack-Ruby-moment" at some point anyway...

THE Saddam Hussein Thread (merged)

THE Saddam Hussein Thread (merged)

I thought he looked pretty good.

The truth is too hard to handle!

Saddam's defence

Re: Saddam's defence

Re: Saddam's defence

Who is online