by Pretorian » Tue 29 Mar 2011, 23:52:43
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pretorian', 'C')orrection-- 9 or more slaves had to be alive by the time of birth of the 10th.
The Soviets followed policies appropriate for the circumstances but the overwhelming direction was in the destruction of the family, the liberation of women from the servitude of marriage and of course, family size appropriate for the nurturing of the collective (read up Marx's views on the role of the family and women therein). Of course, much of what was done in this direction attracted outrage in the decadent West where the family is central in the propagation of the sorsts of ideas that you nurse: on wealth, greed, race, selfishness and the very things that act in a cause and effect manner to decrease the value of your life's experience (for exampe, the importation of slaves and the subsequent cultural flowering in America has given rise to a disconnect in you that now sees you in various states of agiutation and general malaise, lashing out like a petulant child at the inevitable. I have attached a link for your eddification.
Marxist views on family and gender are quite specific however but not of course, subject to being anally observed like some latter day Christian literalist, where for example, the region's needs are paramount as was the case in much of the USSR during the turbulent years of the establishment of the Soviet and WWII.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_in_the_Soviet_Union consider a woman to be a breeding animal. Thanks, finally we are getting somewhere