by Poordogabone » Thu 10 Feb 2011, 19:37:36
Sixstrings wrote:$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his all gets tricky though if there really is cause to think a nuclear attack or some such is being planned.. do you "torture" a little if it can prevent something like that? In all honesty it's a tough call.
First of all terrorist don't have the "Know how" to detonate a nuke even if they get their hands on one, they don't come with a timer like in Hollywood films. But the US media would like to make you believe that so we keep supporting the phony war on terror. you would need in fact a team of highly qualified physicists in order to do that.
On torture, it's rather simple, it's wrong, does not work, never did, never will. Let's suppose for a moment that you have irrefutable proof that a person have the knowledge of the time and place of a terrorist attack, can't think of a single case on how this could be but for the sake of the argument let's go on with this.
you would not need to make torture legal, just fry the guy's balls, and if by chances he spills the beans you're a hero for saving innocents life and no one is going to prosecute you for breaking the law. Similarly if you saw a house burning and save a child inside, do you think that you would be prosecuted for illegal entry or trespassing?