Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Peak oil denialists on this message board?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Peak oil denialists on this message board?

Unread postby Carlhole » Tue 11 Jan 2011, 15:19:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'Y')ou just throw tantrums.

*yawn*
I believe I characterized you, xeno, and oily pretty accurately. Why don't you read my analysis again and . . . comment:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('me', 'C')ornhole believes we humans are going to create a cyborg OverMind that will free us from our earthly chains. We won't need oil anymore because we will upload our minds to computer chips and join the Singularity/Borg.
Isn't that the essential theorem reduced to essentials?


I don't "believe" any such thing. And I'm tired of explaining myself to a person of mediocre intellectual abilities.

Explanation once again for the wittoo baby with the dirty diaper
Carlhole
 

Re: Peak oil denialists on this message board?

Unread postby Dezakin » Tue 11 Jan 2011, 15:30:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'Y')ou guys, our little techtopian coterie of three--Carlhole, Oily, and Xeno--make for strange bedfellows. Cornhole is a 9/11 Truther, Xeno a AGW/Evolution-Denier, and Oily (Oilfinder??) believes that his posts are the same as finding petroleum reserves. An eccentric bunch to say the least.

LEAST!

This ragtag bunch of self-flagellating victims, pointless trolls really, do share a trait---a faith in human exceptionalism. Xeno believe oil will flow forever from our planet, not abiotically or by overturning laws of ecology and decomposition. Rather he has faith in human "laws" of supply/demand and "new" human technologies which will magically grow reserves. In spite of the failures of such gimmicks like fracting, SAGH, THAI, that have already been proven to be little more than investor scams.

Well, I can demonstrate the technical capacity for us to produce over 1000/bbl worth of liquid fuels for the next ten million years at $200/bbl using technology we have today, using nuclear power, limestone, and water. The doomer objection is that it takes too long to build the infrastructure, and we'll all be cavemen by then; Not that it doesn't work.

My objection is that it'll be rendered meaningless by new technologies and infrastructure by the time we would need it, but its a nice little demonstration.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ornhole believes we humans are going to create a cyborg OverMind that will free us from our earthly chains. We won't need oil anymore because we will upload our minds to computer chips and join the Singularity/Borg.

I don't see how that's any more unbelievable than thinking we'll all go back to living like little house on the prairie in a hundred years.
User avatar
Dezakin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Wed 09 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Peak oil denialists on this message board?

Unread postby Carlhole » Tue 11 Jan 2011, 15:45:06

Oil Panic and the Global Crisis: Predictions & Myths

The author, Stephen Gorelick, PhD, is a Professor of Earth Sciences at Stanford University.

Gorelick has gathered together the best evidence for the PO doomer argument and placed it side-by-side the counter-argument. He has not been the primary originator of any of this data; he has simply compiled the BEST argument for the doomer side using the BEST sources of information. He also has compiled the BEST counter-arguments (originated by others) using the BEST data available from the BEST sources.

He places the two arguments side-by-side in his book and allows the reader to come to his own conclusions. That's it!

This is the same stuff that JD or RGR or Xeno or me have used - except that is expressed in a comprehensive, formal way.

Anyone who reads the book realizes that the counter-argument to PO doom is the more convincing one. Throwing immature and stupid tantrums doesn't change any of this.
Carlhole
 

Re: Peak oil denialists on this message board?

Unread postby Carlhole » Tue 11 Jan 2011, 16:05:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '[')url=http://www.4shared.com/dir/AniCTiRk/Oil_Panic_and_the_Global_Crisi.html]Oil Panic and the Global Crisis: Predictions & Myths[/url]
Gorlick's book is a joke.

Yeah, you make statements like that but you're not bright enough to find examples. You CAN'T find any. You're just turning purple-faced because your soiled diaper is making your little bottom sore. Ah, the poor baby.

There are a couple of reviews of it here. Read the reviews at Amazon.

Remember, Gorelick first had to completely describe ALL aspects of the doomer argument. So you can read the first part to see how well he did. He did a fine job of it!

Of course, he used the same level of expertise to fully describe the counter-argument.
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: Peak oil denialists on this message board?

Unread postby Carlhole » Tue 11 Jan 2011, 16:14:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'I') followed your review link. It is by the book's publisher. Lame. Whatever happened to your strict standards of peer review?


Jeez, you really are not very bright.

download
http://www.4shared.com/dir/AniCTiRk/Oil ... Crisi.html

PO.com thread (with reviews - see the OnlineLibrary review, for example)
new-book-oil-panic-and-the-global-crisis-t59992.html

Since Gorelick is not originating any new science, peer-review is not necessary
(I suppose this goes right over your little baby head). Gorelick has simply compiled the most cogent, complete argument from both sides of the issue drawing from only the best sources of original data and placed them together in the same book. What's so damn hard to understand about this?
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: Peak oil denialists on this message board?

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Tue 11 Jan 2011, 17:47:54

All you have to do is look at the general populace of the US or the rest of the world and see the attitudes concerning the global ponzi scheme and how it is melting down to understand the cognitive dissonance when it comes to peaking of global oil production. I've said it once, I'll say it a thousand times, Doomers are not in the majority when it comes to PO. I'm not one, most of us here are not. The smart folks over at TOD are not either. The constant labeling and diatribe castigating this whole site as a Doomers paradise is just ridiculous. Yes there area few here, but most of us believe that its going to be a long emergency. Most of us believe it important to discuss it as once we are off the plateau things are going to CHANGE.

Note I didnt say collapse. Change will be ugly enough when the realization sets in that oil is in decline forever and the ramifications of failing to mitigate that decline cause further problems with economies and societies. Talking about how to cope with that change and make life better are what this site has always been about IMHO. The grating, angering, non productive debate from cornucopia fits no end to that purpose. That is why the invectives fly and there is so much friction for you folks who are literally living in denial.

When decline sets in, and it will, (and I cannot predict that time frame so I dont try) you folks who think that oil will be magically produced forever and that the markets will take care of themselves will have to acknowledge it. The difference between what has transpired on the up slope of mankind's addiction to fossil fuels and what happens in the transition to the other side of that paradigm is one which will be very clear. For those of us who understand the current global economic picture and how it affects alternatives and the ability to replace oil it means lowered standards of living and hardships. IT DOES NOT MEAN DOOM. It can mean that but I dont buy into the DOOM aspect. Humans have a bad track record when it comes to this stuff, history shows that quite well. I see long term significant hardships which myself and my children will have to deal with. I hope for better, but hoping is not how you prepare for life changing events.

A belief in some bright light awakening in mankind at this stage is just as silly as the Doomers. Reality will lay somewhere in between what the DOOMERS see and what the BAU Cornucopians envision. Thats my present take, and the in between will be bad enough. Coping with it, finding solutions, and understanding how to live with less of an energy footprint are the important roles this site can play and has played.

Labeling this as some crazy Doomer lounge is just patently false and I will fight it at every turn along the way. You folks who believe BAU will continue and that oil will continue to magically increase over the years need really to find another playground. Your not convincing anyone here and that appears to be what you are trying to do.

Along with this the Cornies, especially those mentioned above ;), Really seem to be here for one reason and one reason only and that is to disrupt, anger, and generally corrupt the message and discussions which go on. I'd suggest you folks look in the mirror and wonder why you need or want to do that. It suggests mental disorder and immaturity.

By the way Carlhole, I jsut picked up Gorelicks book and will give it a read. I can and do embrace the "other" argument in the thirst for better understanding on how all of this will or will not play out. It appears not everyone who debates on this subject is willing nor possibly able to do that.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: Peak oil denialists on this message board?

Unread postby TheAntiDoomer » Tue 11 Jan 2011, 18:05:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'L')abeling this as some crazy Doomer lounge is just patently false and I will fight it at every turn along the way. You folks who believe BAU will continue and that oil will continue to magically increase over the years need really to find another playground. Your not convincing anyone here and that appears to be what you are trying to do.


deletedMany of us so called "cornies" have never said you the we think oil will continually magically increase forvever, that sir is a flat out lie. What we have said over and over again, is that replacments to oil and gas (which there is plenty of for the time being) will gradually replace our current usage of oil, and life will not necessarly be for the worse as you expect. So please if you're going to tell people what it is we believe at least use factsdeleted
"The human ability to innovate out of a jam is profound.That’s why Darwin will always be right, and Malthus will always be wrong.” -K.R. Sridhar


Do I make you Corny? :)

"expect 8$ gas on 08/08/08" - Prognosticator
User avatar
TheAntiDoomer
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1556
Joined: Wed 18 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Peak oil denialists on this message board?

Unread postby sparky » Tue 11 Jan 2011, 18:07:20

@ Airlinepilot
Your post is good , that's the Peak oil mainline and certainly close to my own belief

Some provisos , the long reccession is the Best case ,
food supply problem , misery politics and any such black swans events could disturb the peace .
It's not going to be mad max for sure but strife and conflicts tend to increase when people are hurting
User avatar
sparky
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3587
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney , OZ

Re: Peak oil denialists on this message board?

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Tue 11 Jan 2011, 18:40:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheAntiDoomer', ' ')What we have said over and over again, is that replacments to oil and gas (which there is plenty of for the time being) will gradually replace our current usage of oil, and life will not necessarly be for the worse as you expect.


And this is the very point we disagree on. The side which predicts harder times and a long emergency wins with the facts for me. Understanding decline and the scale and scope of necessary replacements is not a religious study, its not about what you or I believe. Its simple thermodynamics, discovery,production rates/costs, alternatives and the lack there of due to failing global economies. Your side fails for me and the vehemency with which you promote such BAU normality is telling.

I can acknowledge certain technologies and ideas which will HELP, but I cannot see the necessary amounts or replacements coming in any reasonable time frame due to the scale and scope of oil usage and its importance in our present day economic and social structure. Without a continuing cheap and abundant source right now, all those corny/ techno/utopian solutions get cut off at the knees before they ever get a chance to grow to REAL REPLACEMENT solutions.

Your going to run out of time because we have refused to do anything prior to the pain induced by decline. Its what Montequest used to rant about and I tend to agree with him. The present global financial house of cards doesn't help either and its partly a symptom of the plateau we currently enjoy. Inability to GROW cheap abundant energy results in a failure of fiat monetary systems which in turn has a vicious effect on attempting to replace that which a lot of our population growth and standards of living have been based on for almost 100 years now.

Good luck with the BAU approach, I doubt without some form of miracle tech discovery we can continue it on the other side of the decline slope. I always hope for the best, but prepare for the worst.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta
Top

Re: Peak oil denialists on this message board?

Unread postby Xenophobe » Tue 11 Jan 2011, 19:50:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '[')url=http://www.4shared.com/dir/AniCTiRk/Oil_Panic_and_the_Global_Crisi.html]Oil Panic and the Global Crisis: Predictions & Myths[/url]
Gorlick's book is a joke.


Please reference the page, paragraph, footnote or conclusion you disagree with.
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08
Top

Re: Peak oil denialists on this message board?

Unread postby Xenophobe » Tue 11 Jan 2011, 20:47:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', ' ')I've said it once, I'll say it a thousand times, Doomers are not in the majority when it comes to PO.


Local survey says hard crash 54%, soft landing 46%.

survey-hard-soft-landing-us-non-us-t2366.html

Take those results, roll in brimstone and fire from ex-latocians and yes...I think PO is all about Doomers. Largest and most popular website on the web had the domain doomers.us

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AP', '
') The smart folks over at TOD are not either.


The smart folks over at TOD don't know what oil is. Come back and tell us when they get smart enough to figure out the basics.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AP', '
') Most of us believe it important to discuss it as once we are off the plateau things are going to CHANGE.


Things have already changed. When this website started you couldn't EV around unless you built your own. Now you can get one at your Chevy or Nissan dealer.
When this website started, peak oil hadn't happened yet. Now its years in the past. When this website started, Americans consumed 20.7 million barrels a day of crude. Most recent figures in 2009, 18.7. US natural gas production when this website started, in the middle of THE US NATURAL GAS CLIFF!! 23.4 TCF? And now? 26.0 TCF. Lots has changed.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AP', ' ')
Note I didnt say collapse.


Did you think we would have yet another peak? That the natural cliff would be a joke? That discoveries would outrun consumption as Oily has shown? That Americans have decided to use 10% less crude? Quite true...no collapse either. Heck, I'll even bet airliners are still flying, and people still have jobs burning thousands of gallons of jetfuel because...we have plenty to burn!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AP', '
')I see long term significant hardships which myself and my children will have to deal with. I hope for better, but hoping is not how you prepare for life changing events.

Hardships...true.....I agree....maybe we should all consider trading in our Lears for Cessna's? Times are tough, I guess such claims are more amusing just based on who is saying them.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AP', '
') Labeling this as some crazy Doomer lounge is just patently false and I will fight it at every turn along the way.


So will I. Comrades in Arms! Presenting solutions to the common man (those who don't have the wherewithall to own their own aircraft anyway)!! Ladies and Gentleman, you don't have to have the financial means to own your own aircraft while you ignore peak oil, you can CURE your peak oil issues!
Image

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AP', '
') You folks who believe BAU will continue and that oil will continue to magically increase over the years need really to find another playground. Your not convincing anyone here and that appears to be what you are trying to do.


Those of us who have already SOLVED peak oil hardly need to be told that others are still frantic over how to fuel their aircraft cars. Stop buying fuel people! It's easy! Xeno and Revi can show you how!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AP', '
')I'd suggest you folks look in the mirror and wonder why you need or want to do that. It suggests mental disorder and immaturity.

Most of us hang at TOD. I thought we were smart guys?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AP', '
') By the way Carlhole, I jsut picked up Gorelicks book and will give it a read. I can and do embrace the "other" argument in the thirst for better understanding on how all of this will or will not play out. It appears not everyone who debates on this subject is willing nor possibly able to do that.

Its a good book.
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08
Top

Re: Peak oil denialists on this message board?

Unread postby Xenophobe » Tue 11 Jan 2011, 21:39:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Xenophobe', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '[')url=http://www.4shared.com/dir/AniCTiRk/Oil_Panic_and_the_Global_Crisi.html]Oil Panic and the Global Crisis: Predictions & Myths[/url]
Gorlick's book is a joke.


Please reference the page, paragraph, footnote or conclusion you disagree with.
How many pages are in the book?


271, plus the early roman numeral stuff.
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08
Top

Re: Peak oil denialists on this message board?

Unread postby Xenophobe » Tue 11 Jan 2011, 21:41:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'I') believe Xeno has finally been canned. I tried to link to his Prius Conversion and the post disappeared.


The first rule of censorship Fight Club is, you don't talk about censorship Fight club.
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08
Top

Re: Peak oil denialists on this message board?

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Tue 11 Jan 2011, 22:03:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Xenophobe', 'L')ocal survey says hard crash 54%, soft landing 46%.


Since when did "hard landing" mean DOOM? Seriously? Arguing semantics methinks here and your conclusions are biased.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Xenophobe', 'T')ake those results, roll in brimstone and fire from ex-latocians and yes...I think PO is all about Doomers.


Patently false but you refuse to accept it.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Xenophobe', 'T')he smart folks over at TOD don't know what oil is. Come back and tell us when they get smart enough to figure out the basics.


Wow, really losing credibility with this one. Ridiculous and completely BS statement and you know it. Nice try. Complete FAIL.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Xenophobe', 'W')hen this website started, peak oil hadn't happened yet. Now its years in the past.


That's completely still up for debate. It appears that crude peaked in 05 and that likely still stands. Using some new fuzzy all liquids number does not count. We may or may not be past peak and I still personally think we need another year or two to know. My bet is we are there, but the jury is still out I think. Listening to the moronic chant about multiple peaks and the failed logic behind that argument makes it even more obvious you just dont grasp the finite nature of oil as a resource and that it IS possible we are living during the time it will peak and decline. I call that DENIAL.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Xenophobe', 'D')id you think we would have yet another peak? That the natural cliff would be a joke? That discoveries would outrun consumption as Oily has shown? That Americans have decided to use 10% less crude? Quite true...no collapse either. Heck, I'll even bet airliners are still flying, and people still have jobs burning thousands of gallons of jetfuel because...we have plenty to burn!

Your refusal to understand the nature of US demand and why it has done what it has points to your lack of ability to connect the dots. As to the airline industry I am here to tell you that VAST affects due to high fuel costs have ravaged the industry and it is likely we go through another round of it soon should oil move above 100$/bbl. Your clueless here. FAIL again.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Xenophobe', 'm')aybe we should all consider trading in our Lears for Cessna's? Times are tough, I guess such claims are more amusing just based on who is saying them.

Even the folks operating those Cessna's are being severely affected by higher fuel costs than we have ever seen. Go down to any local FBO and just ask. The answer should surprise you since you think everything is ok.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Xenophobe', 'P')resenting solutions to the common man (those who don't have the wherewithall to own their own aircraft anyway)!! Ladies and Gentleman, you don't have to have the financial means to own your own aircraft while you ignore peak oil, you can CURE your peak oil issues!
Image

Touting some high end EV science project as the solution to PO is one of the dumbest things you have brought up here lately. Very few people presently have the means of even owning one. I guess you think going even more in debt is some kind of solution? By the way most smaller fuel efficient aircraft cost far less than that overpriced pile of batteries.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Xenophobe', 'M')ost of us hang at TOD. I thought we were smart guys?

You may hang there but you are routinely destroyed in your Corny arguments, Ive seen it.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron