by cephalotus » Mon 29 Nov 2010, 19:50:06
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cabrone', '
')
The only way I can see the Irish getting out of this is to get out of the EU, re-instate the punt and then watch as it sinks out of sight.
Yet again the people have been left unconsulted as the 'elites' royally screw them.
If Ireland gets out of the Euro the new currency will evaluate immediately but the debt will remain in Euro or Pounds.
House owners will not be able to pay their mortgage in a foreign currency, so their houses will belong to the credit owner, i.e. British or German banks.
People would have to live in tents while the houses will rot because nobody will buy or use them...
In my opinion (as a German) Ireland should take the bailout money and get the mess with its banks and its credits sorted out. Keep the Irish economy running and if you believe that a low tax rate for companies is helpful in the next years let it be so.
But when you become the "celtic tiger" again keep your banks and the desire for easy credit under control and don't forget to repay the bailout money incl. interest and don't forget to start an economy that is more compatible with the rest of Europe. It's not the Irish people that benefit from the low tax rates on US companies, it's the shareholders of those companies that profit most.
The low tax strategy can not be sustainable, because other countries like Estonia can easily undercut you on that area (they already do so).
On the other hand: If you want to leave the EU / Euro, because you believe that it makes your lives worse let's find a solution for that. But please pay back the transfer money that you got from Europe which surely helped you (together with other factors of course) to transfer from one of the poorest to one of richest European nations within a few years (based on wages).
I would be happy with both solutions, but I prefer the European model. I don't mind if it costs nation x 5% more than nation y, this is minor compared to the gains from a more unified Europa. France and Germany fought three disastrous wars within 75 years (one war within every generation) and a Europe without wars is worth a lot.
This desire is seldom understandable to people from the USA, who lack the experience of "modern" wars on their own ground.
I also like the idea to travel through Europe without borders.
And finally, no European nation will be strong enough in international politics during the 21st century with the military super power USA, the new economic super power China (and India?) and Russia with its energy resources.
Ageing and shrinking "old Europe" will simply be destroyed slowly between the super powers if it can't speak with one voice.
The US on the other side has great interest in a weak Euro and a weak Europe, because otherwise Europe already has become the more powerful economic power in the world.
If you look at the economic facts its hard to believe that the Euro should be in danger when you look at the US$.
So far the EZB does not need to print billions and billions of Euro to try desperately to kick start the economy. The dept / GDP throughout Euro land is lower compared to the US, the new dept rate is much lower. Private dept is also much lower, the trade balance is around zero (and not billions in the red) and the manufacturing industry is still intact in many countries. Our social net of benefits is much better developed.
Greece may be almost bankrupt, but what about California for an example?