by SeaGypsy » Wed 10 Nov 2010, 20:33:32
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'C')rap I typed into this thread on and off all morning then the stinkin site crapped, so here is the abbreviated version...
I used to think morality had something to do with it, but I've decided there is no moral obligation to hold up your end of a crooked deal.
Borrowing with no intention of paying is effectively stealing.
Borrowing whilst in a 'secure' job, to secure 'assets' or inject capital into a business, then finding the job is gone and assets depreciated/ business died is something else.
The bank takes a risk too, when handing over a loan.
Deciding to pay back loans taken in very different circumstances is only a moral question if there is a margin in your income to be able to do so.
if you have to starve your family in order to pay a negative equity loan, morality sides with not paying, but feeding your family.
The smugness of posters who can confidently claim that 'the mortgage is now my only debt and it will be paid in 2 or 4 years' is still an article of faith.
Revaluation will only really begin when the printing of money either stops or goes full hyper. revaluation is inevitable as the sun rising in the east.
For an idea what your house is really worth, measure the distance from a similarly sized and purposed city in China, lok for a similar house for a ballpark figure.