by Outcast_Searcher » Tue 05 Oct 2010, 04:33:12
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '
')Granted, 2010 is a pretty lousy year for tax receipts but it still says a lot about a country when its elderly support systems absorb such a large share of government revenue. When it comes time to slash the budget, Congress will cut infrastructure and education spending before touching Social Security. We'll be stealing from the future to pay for the past. And for that, my generation will (rightly or wrongly) blame the Baby Boomers.
Is there any first world country which isn't paying a huge proportion of its government revenue as benefits for the elderly (medical, retirement, etc)?
Within 30 years given current demographic trends, won't all major economic powers including China be "drowning in the expenses of caring for old people" unless they just basically cut them off?
Yes, the US has a big problem with its promised obligations to the elderly. But lets not delude ourselves into thinking this is in any way unique, or even unusual.
If peak oil, and resource constraints in general, are for real -- and not mitigated easily by technology as our cornie members assume -- I strongly suspect our society will be forced to make the elderly live with MUCH smaller benefits -- perhaps much sooner than many of us contemplate.
(As for me, when I get to the point I need to go into a nursing home for good -- I'd just like the right to be given good anesthesia, and then killed as quickly and painlessly (and at a reasonable cost) as possible.
I don't WANT to suffer a lot in the late stages of my life, and I don't WANT to be a burden to society either. It's REALLY sick to me that we give our pets this choice, but due to religous idiocy, we don't give people this choice. (Note that I'm saying personal CHOICE here).
It's hugely ironic that IMO, financial pressures will cause society to make this choice available as it should, but religion, the supposed philosophy of compassion -- prevents it today and will fight this choice all the way.)
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.