by americandream » Mon 05 Jul 2010, 21:27:32
You will note that the site characterises the hydro-carbon issue as "undoubtedly the most serious economic and cultural crossroads in several generations". That qualifier places the peak oil objective of this site in the realms of due diligence. In other words, we are being informed of a matter that requires our discussion, debate and monitoring, the assumption being that in the process of debating, we may arrive at a fuller knowledge of a matter central to our culture. And what is our culture? A capitalist one borne of exponential growth and obsolescent consumerism. In other words, a tendency to live beyond our means.
Within that framework, any reasonable inquiror would seek to establish thresholds. Some may experience impatience and wander off, others may have a fuller picture of the issues and monitor events. Yet others still may flail in the dark inspite of glaring evidence that the oil blood of capitalism is at "a cultural crossroads". But the site remains true to its intention and for that, it is a valuable resource.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tami', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', '
')
At then end of the day, this site's objective is to warn us of the risks in living beyond our means. Whether those risks materialise tomorrow or in a few decades (as I generally believe), it still plays, in my opinion, a valuable role.
When people claim things about a site objective, its relatively easy to check.
From the About Us section of this site.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Peak Oil WebSite About Us', 'T')he web is full of diversions, distractions, fluff, and filth, but there are few rare places on the web where you can discuss the things that actually matter to our lives, our families, and to future generations.
Our site’s mission has been “exploring the issue of hydrocarbon depletion” AKA Peak Oil, undoubtedly the most serious economic and cultural crossroads in several generations.
Perhaps everyone automatically equates peak oil with "living beyond our means", I certainly don't, and if the website owners thought the same thing, maybe they should have said so?