Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Neat little video about the monetary system

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Neat little video about the monetary system

Postby bshirt » Tue 20 Feb 2007, 11:40:22

mmasters, thank you for your well written explainations.

Jefferson was on the money 100%.
User avatar
bshirt
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat 23 Dec 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Neat little video about the monetary system

Postby MrBill » Tue 20 Feb 2007, 11:59:46

I am not entirely sure how you walk the cat backwards either. I suppose you can compare investments into depreciating assets to borrowing money and paying interest even though the investment loses value. It is a sunk cost.

But I suppose it depends on whether or not you can afford it. People still borrow money to buy new cars. Either they can afford to take those losses or not. They are not likely to sell the used car for more than their loan plus interest.

If we look at historical trends where real growth was much lower then of course the decision to borrow to buy an asset is not an easy one taken lightly.

Take long-term real-estate trends where a traditional 30-year mortgage costed 6% p.a. and houses went up predictably 3% per year on average. You have to offset the cost of owning the house plus paying interest at a higher rate than its appreciation by comparing it to renting, and even then it only made sense if you actually intended to live in that house for let us say more than 30-years.

In Japan where you have had negative growth in real estate prices that have fallen 75% in the past two decades from their peaks for example you have 50-year mortgages. There home ownership becomes an inter-generational issue. Because the real burden of interest in a low, slow growth environment is that much higher. They cannot count on inflation devaluing their future debts.

Just a few examples. I have not given it too much thought. Cheers.


UPDATE: Umm, it occurred to me that if a $10 trillion economy contracted by 25%, just as an example, then it is still $7.5 trillion. One of the largest in the world. This means that income related investments need to focus on free-cash flow and not just capital appreciation. For example a 10-year railway bond paid for by user fees or fares.

It is a simplistic assumption made by many here on peak oil dot com that you need unlimited growth. The economy needs to generate a profit. It does not need to grow exponentially against a background of energy scarcity. I probably should have pointed this out earlier. But then again it is kinda fun to watch 'self-taught experts' make fools of themselves! ; - ))
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Neat little video about the monetary system

Postby joewp » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 02:05:48

Can we settle this with an explanation from the horse's mouth? Commercial banks do create money. The St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank says so right on their website.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Commercial banks are very important in the money
supply process because thc public chooses to hold
money in the form of demand deposits. When currcncy
supplied by the monetary authorities is exchanged
by the public for a demand deposit, the form
of money changes. In addition, banks obtain additional
reserves. In a fractional reserve banking system,
which is what we have in the United States,
required reserves equal only a fraction of deposits.
The remainder of funds obtained with deposits may
be used by banks to make loans or investments. By
making loans commercial banks increase their liabilities
(demand deposits ) and assets (loans ) , and in a
sense “create” money on the basis of the original
money (reserves) provided by the monetary authorities.


linky-poo


Yep, they "create" money out of nothing. You deposit $100 then the bank loans out $900 based on the reserve you've given them, and they count the loan paper as an "asset" to offset the "liabilities" of those new dollars in demand deposit accounts they just created.

Banks are going to end up owning just about everything within a decade or two after PO unless people wise up to the scam.
Joe P. joeparente.com
"Only when the last tree is cut; only when the last river is polluted; only when the last fish is caught; only then will they realize that you cannot eat money." - Cree Indian Proverb
User avatar
joewp
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Keeping dry in South Florida

Re: Neat little video about the monetary system

Postby MonteQuest » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 02:58:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Micki', ' ')Obviously a topic that requires intimate study to find out the whole picture.


In December of 2004, I wrote a thread that explains it all.

39 pages. I noted the pages of the most relevant parts. Covers it all, fractional reserve, M1 M2 money supply, etc.

Our Money System and Oil Depletion; Are they Compatible?

http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic3761.html
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Neat little video about the monetary system

Postby MrBill » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 05:57:28

joewp wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ep, they "create" money out of nothing. You deposit $100 then the bank loans out $900 based on the reserve you've given them, and they count the loan paper as an "asset" to offset the "liabilities" of those new dollars in demand deposit accounts they just created.

Banks are going to end up owning just about everything within a decade or two after PO unless people wise up to the scam.


So Big Bank has $100 on deposit from you. Where do they get the other $900 to lend out? They would have to borrow it from the Interbank market or go to the central bank for the balance. For that they would be paying interest on the money they borrow from someone else because they cannot create it out of thin air. Of course, the Fed is getting their cash from the US treasury per the link you just posted.

So pretty much if I went to Big Bank for a mortgage. I would have to pay interest plus the principle back on the money I borrowed. Boy, some scam. I can hardly understand the mechanics? Let us write another 10-pages! ; - )
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Neat little video about the monetary system

Postby MrBill » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 07:48:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Micki', ' ')Obviously a topic that requires intimate study to find out the whole picture.


In December of 2004, I wrote a thread that explains it all.

39 pages. I noted the pages of the most relevant parts. Covers it all, fractional reserve, M1 M2 money supply, etc.

Our Money System and Oil Depletion; Are they Compatible?

http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic3761.html


MonteQuest, I posted my response in the orignal thread. Thanks. MrBill.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Neat little video about the monetary system

Postby MonteQuest » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 10:22:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'S')o Big Bank has $100 on deposit from you. Where do they get the other $900 to lend out?


That's why it is called fractional reserve banking. You don't have to have the $900 to lend it out, you only need the $100 in reserve to make the ledger entry.

I am surprised you don't have a grasp of this.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Neat little video about the monetary system

Postby Bas » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 10:44:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'S')o Big Bank has $100 on deposit from you. Where do they get the other $900 to lend out?


That's why it is called fractional reserve banking. You don't have to have the $900 to lend it out, you only need the $100 in reserve to make the ledger entry.

I am surprised you don't have a grasp of this.


I think this is the fundamental difference between the American and European banking systems; in Europe the bank has to borrow the $900 from the Central bank and the lion's share of the interest will ultimately go to the state. So I guess the system in America could be called a capitalist "scam" and the european system a government "scam". In the end the economy needs money to go around though, too much money in the market will cause inflation, too little will grind it to a halt.

And yeah, the instituted policies surrounding the money market that we have now won't survive PO.
Bas
 
Top

Re: Neat little video about the monetary system

Postby MrBill » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 11:21:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'S')o Big Bank has $100 on deposit from you. Where do they get the other $900 to lend out?


That's why it is called fractional reserve banking. You don't have to have the $900 to lend it out, you only need the $100 in reserve to make the ledger entry.

I am surprised you don't have a grasp of this.


Well, considering I manage $2.5 billion in assets and have a funding book of over $750-900 million I guess I do understand that my nostro accounts always have to be fully funded. I cannot lend out more money than I have. If it is not physically there I need to borrow it.

Capital adequacy rules and minimum reserves mean that banks cannot lend out more than let us say 90% of my primary deposits, if they have to keep 10% as minimum reserves with the central bank.

Actually, I am not a bank, so I have very complicated CAD rules and I do not keep any money at the central bank. But that is because I am an licensed investment firm regulated by the CySEC and not a bank.

But I have certainly traded foreign exchange and money markets in banks for many years both in the USA and abroad, so I can tell you exactly how it works. Because actually, I do have a grasp of this, MQ! ; - )

If I have $100 in deposits and need to lend $900, but my CAD is 10%, per this example, then I need to borrow that $900 from the Interbank money market. I just cannot create a ledger entry. The money has to be there in my account to transfer to the account of my loan customer.

The reserve requirement only applies to primary deposits of which banks have to hold back 10%. As far as the Interbank money market goes they can borrow and lend out as much as they want. Although, under Tier I & Tier II CAD (Basel II) rules they have to provision for any risky assets on their balance sheet such as non-OECD bonds or corporate loans.

But at all times the bank's nostro accounts have to be in plus. In every currency that they deal in. Their nostro accounts with other banks have to be also covered. If they are a primary dealer, their DTC account at the Fed, too. If they do not have the liquidity, they have to borrow it. Eventually, from the central bank if they cannot get it in the Interbank market.

And even then not always. During the Czech currency crisis the Czech central bank refused to lend to me saying they would only guarantee Czech domestic banks and not foreign branches operating in the Czech Republic. So there you go, lender of last resort also has its limits and qualifications.

The point being is that banks cannot create money out of thin air. They have to borrow it. That is why they pay interest on deposits or otherwise try to attract clients through their private banking, asset mangement and other departments. They also borrow through the money markets from one another. Or issue bonds to raise capital. The equity markets are also another source of potential funding for them.

But at the end of the day their cost of capital is the combined interest expense that you will see on every bank's balance sheet if you look. And on the other side of the balance sheet you will see their net income from lending.

So please. Don't tell me fairytales about the creation of money and fractional banking when you really mean the expansion of credit and the money multiplier effect.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Neat little video about the monetary system

Postby dinopello » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 12:00:40

It seems like what deserves a mention in these type videos is how things have changed in terms of ownership and consumption since the days of direct exchange of goods or fully backed currency.

Don't a huge more percentage of people own stuff like land now? This is a big reason debt is needed. Why do you need to own land ? I'm just asking, I like owning land myself.

Loans for cars - why do you need a car ? Not to mention all the unneeded crap that people go into short term debt for. What came first - the availability/use of debt-based currency, or the demand to own and consume? Anyway it seems that they go together.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village

Re: Neat little video about the monetary system

Postby MrBill » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 12:08:37

Sorry just to correct the math in the above examples as far as I am concerned that if minimum reserve requirements are 10% then a $1000 deposit would amount to $100 of reserves, while $900 could be lent out further. If there is no slippage* in the system, and it all gets passed from bank to bank then the potential money multiplier effect would be equal to $11.000 in total credit created.

If the minimum reserve is dropped to 5% then it would be $20.876. Or a difference of $9876

-5% : +88% is a lot of leverage that the central bank can use to add or to drain liquidity in addition to central bank purchases and sales of treasuries via repos.

So of course money supply growth is a very important issue especially as it relates to the price of assets.


*RE slippage. Not all money borrowed will immediately put back to work in the form of primary deposits and more loans.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Neat little video about the monetary system

Postby Bas » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 12:39:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'S')orry just to correct the math in the above examples as far as I am concerned that if minimum reserve requirements are 10% then a $1000 deposit would amount to $100 of reserves, while $900 could be lent out further. If there is no slippage* in the system, and it all gets passed from bank to bank then the potential money multiplier effect would be equal to $11.000 in total credit created.

If the minimum reserve is dropped to 5% then it would be $20.876. Or a difference of $9876

-5% : +88% is a lot of leverage that the central bank can use to add or to drain liquidity in addition to central bank purchases and sales of treasuries via repos.

So of course money supply growth is a very important issue especially as it relates to the price of assets.


*RE slippage. Not all money borrowed will immediately put back to work in the form of primary deposits and more loans.


Now that sounds much more familiar; I think that's how it's explained in most of the textbooks.

And how was it with european banks again? they have to have a credit account of a certain size with the central bank, on which the official CB interest rate has to be paid; a more direct form of control.
Bas
 
Top

Re: Neat little video about the monetary system

Postby mmasters » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 13:47:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'S')orry just to correct the math in the above examples as far as I am concerned that if minimum reserve requirements are 10% then a $1000 deposit would amount to $100 of reserves, while $900 could be lent out further. If there is no slippage* in the system, and it all gets passed from bank to bank then the potential money multiplier effect would be equal to $11.000 in total credit created.

If the minimum reserve is dropped to 5% then it would be $20.876. Or a difference of $9876

-5% : +88% is a lot of leverage that the central bank can use to add or to drain liquidity in addition to central bank purchases and sales of treasuries via repos.

So of course money supply growth is a very important issue especially as it relates to the price of assets.

It's also a leading factor or root cause as relating to booms and busts, the rich getting richer, govenment leverage, wars, monopolies, communism, plutocracy, etc...

Also it's not just govies for leverage, some central banks can monetize (or create money out of thin air to be introduced into the system for) any debt bearing instrument, including monetization of the debt of other govenments.

Government debt is not necessary to kick off a boom in the US system. US Government debt was low in the roaring 20s. The discount window (or loan window supposed to be used in emergencies incase of bank runs) was constantly used to monetize various bank debt instruments creating the expansion of money prior to the great depression.

Just have to extrapolate a little and not try to apply "investment banking" principles to everything. ;)
User avatar
mmasters
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun 16 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Top

Re: Neat little video about the monetary system

Postby Yvan » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 13:54:32

Mr. Bill, I think the math is slightly wrong. The system is based on an infinite geometric series. So with 5% reserve requirement, a $1000 initial deposit allows $19950 in loans. 10% allows $9900, etc...
Last edited by Yvan on Wed 21 Feb 2007, 14:00:51, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Yvan
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon 03 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Neat little video about the monetary system

Postby mmasters » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 13:57:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'S')o please. Don't tell me fairytales about the creation of money and fractional banking when you really mean the expansion of credit and the money multiplier effect.


:o
User avatar
mmasters
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun 16 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Top

Re: Neat little video about the monetary system

Postby Yvan » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 15:13:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('joewp', 'Y')ep, they "create" money out of nothing. You deposit $100 then the bank loans out $900 based on the reserve you've given them, and they count the loan paper as an "asset" to offset the "liabilities" of those new dollars in demand deposit accounts they just created.

This is not true and it is a shame that this movie leads people to believe that a bank can loan more than it has as deposit.
If you deposit $100 then the bank can only lend $100*(1-RR). So if the reserve requirement is 10% your bank can only lend $90!
The multiplier effect is only obtained through the successive deposits that this loan generates.

A bank NEVER loans more money than it has as deposit. Otherwise liabilities and assets would not balance each other.
User avatar
Yvan
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon 03 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Neat little video about the monetary system

Postby MacG » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 15:32:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Yvan', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('joewp', 'Y')ep, they "create" money out of nothing. You deposit $100 then the bank loans out $900 based on the reserve you've given them, and they count the loan paper as an "asset" to offset the "liabilities" of those new dollars in demand deposit accounts they just created.

This is not true and it is a shame that this movie leads people to believe that a bank can loan more than it has as deposit.
If you deposit $100 then the bank can only lend $100*(1-RR). So if the reserve requirement is 10% your bank can only lend $90!
The multiplier effect is only obtained through the successive deposits that this loan generates.

A bank NEVER loans more money than it has as deposit. Otherwise liabilities and assets would not balance each other.


The movie shows exactly this. In great detail to that! It's the comments here which are sometimes a bit misleading.
User avatar
MacG
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1137
Joined: Sat 04 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Neat little video about the monetary system

Postby Bas » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 15:35:10

you mean what joewp says, right, MacG? it's a huge difference, yanno
Bas
 

Re: Neat little video about the monetary system

Postby firestarter » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 15:47:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bas', 'y')ou mean what joewp says, right, MacG? it's a huge difference, yanno


Actually I think Yvan and Mr Bill are correct in that a $100 deposit will yield a bank the ability to lend directly $90 of the initial $100 on deposit.
User avatar
firestarter
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1171
Joined: Sun 19 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Neat little video about the monetary system

Postby Bas » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 15:49:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('firestarter', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bas', 'y')ou mean what joewp says, right, MacG? it's a huge difference, yanno


Actually I think Yvan and Mr Bill are correct in that a $100 deposit will yield a bank the ability to lend directly $90 of the initial $100 on deposit.


that's what I think and that's why this video is misleading; it gives you the impression that it's $ 900
Bas
 
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron