Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Losing the will to live?

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Losing the will to live?

Unread postby AmericanEmpire » Fri 05 Aug 2005, 19:54:37

Do you think suicide rates will go up post peak crash. There are many people who will probably lose the will to live when their life and world crashes down around them.

Most people have plans and dreams for the future. Ones that oil depletion will take away.

At any rate people are not likely to act rational when the crisis hits. :cry:
AmericanEmpire
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Thu 14 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby elgayna » Fri 05 Aug 2005, 20:24:49

From my viewpoint, If it would happen at the rate you are suggesting, then yes ofcourse. If however people are willing to change their habits (change from mass consumption to having what we really need etc etc) and change their views on what's really important, they might stand a chance...

But its looking pretty bleak. It came as a huge shock to me when I found this site. And yet. Still I continue to want things I not neccesarily need ;-)

I am learning though ;-))
User avatar
elgayna
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue 21 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Portugal

Unread postby OilyMon » Fri 05 Aug 2005, 21:57:34

Think back to the Great Depression. On Black Monday or Tuesday it was not uncommon to see people throwing themselves out of thier office windows. Offices are much bigger and buildings are much taller now meaning the number of people next to a window, or on a floor with access to a window that is above falling death height are much greater. I wonder if the same proportion of the work force is at or above falling death height now then was in '29?
User avatar
OilyMon
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 188
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Southern Ontario

Unread postby EnergySpin » Fri 05 Aug 2005, 22:04:39

Yes suicide rate will go up. Depression rates have been going up for decades. The "go after what you do not need" religion is demanding human sacrifices.
In any case .... life does not come with a guarantee for happiness. We make our own happiness and our future (within the limits of the laws of thermodynamics).
I would like to see how the religion thing plays out. People tend to think that God guarantees heaven on earth (even though the Bible never really says that). People might turn both against and to religion ... and cut each other throats. In the end the anti-consumerists, agnostic, atheists, pro-science pro-environment type will inherit this earth. I'm so optimistic today :roll:
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby MD » Fri 05 Aug 2005, 22:07:21

How many actual window jumpings were there? One or two?

That said, we should be very concerned about irrational behavior resulting from broken expectations/world view.
Stop filling dumpsters, as much as you possibly can, and everything will get better.

Just think it through.
It's not hard to do.
User avatar
MD
COB
COB
 
Posts: 4953
Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: On the ball

Unread postby parainwater » Fri 05 Aug 2005, 22:56:37

I consider life after peak oil an opportunity to use many of the skills
I have that are not needed right now. In some ways I actually look
forward to it. However, I have a wide variety of health problems that
I am dependent on medications for. This part scares the heck out of
me. Without my meds I would die a slow miserable death while my family got to watch.
I am sure however that I would self terminate before it became
unbearable.
User avatar
parainwater
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

one account

Unread postby Cool Hand Linc » Fri 05 Aug 2005, 23:06:35

I remember reading something about 9 people jumping by noon on Black Thursday. Can't remember where or say if its accurate.
Peace out!

Cool Hand Linc 8)
User avatar
Cool Hand Linc
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 922
Joined: Sat 17 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Tulsa, Ok

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Fri 05 Aug 2005, 23:11:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilyMon', 'T')hink back to the Great Depression. On Black Monday or Tuesday it was not uncommon to see people throwing themselves out of thier office windows. Offices are much bigger and buildings are much taller now meaning the number of people next to a window, or on a floor with access to a window that is above falling death height are much greater. I wonder if the same proportion of the work force is at or above falling death height now then was in '29?


Don't forget, we have spread out, not up. The suburbs aren't exactly "jump off a building suicide" friendly.

Many people have ground level officies or are only on the second floor. It's difficult to kill yourself from a 12 foot fall.

Gun ownership rates are also down considerably.

Most people can't tie a knot to save their life (or end it).

I would suspect that the old, half a bottle of sleeping pills routine will be the more popular choice.

Anyway, I think suicide rates will go up. People demand a lot from their lives and a decreased standard of living will make many people miserable. The concept of doing dishes by hand-pumped water is just too much for many of these soccer moms.

Unemployment also increases the suicide rate. People without jobs are often people without hope. No hope = suicide for some.

Sorry if I sound cold in this post, I lack empathy for those kinds of people.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Unread postby gnm » Fri 05 Aug 2005, 23:25:54

Suicide?

GEEEEEEEEZZZZZZZ,

Some people have NO patience.

Time will have us all.....

-G :twisted:
gnm
 

Unread postby MicroHydro » Sat 06 Aug 2005, 01:16:19

Suicide rates will be high among (formerly) middle class middle aged white males. They will have lost a lot, with little hope of recouping their losses.

Interestingly current suicide rates are lower among non-white men, women, and lower income people in general. Those with low expectations have a higher tolerance for adversity. This will probably continue to be true.

The homeless might not even notice PO, and have already perfected the skills for living without an income.
"The world is changed... I feel it in the water... I feel it in the earth... I smell it in the air... Much that once was, is lost..." - Galadriel
User avatar
MicroHydro
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun 10 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Liamj » Sat 06 Aug 2005, 03:48:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilyMon', '
')Suicide rates will be high among (formerly) middle class middle aged white males. They will have lost a lot, with little hope of recouping their losses.
every cloud.. Who was it said approx 'science advances by funerals', theres got to be parallels in business/govt.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Interestingly current suicide rates are lower among non-white men, women, and lower income people in general. Those with low expectations have a higher tolerance for adversity. This will probably continue to be true.
I wouldn't be surprised, even just on the promise of change. To stop morbidity going back up you'd have to arm those people with a meaningfully accurate model of their world and what the hell is going on, then maybe they'll make new and better choices and we'll get to keep grid electricity.
User avatar
Liamj
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 864
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: 145'2"E 37'46"S

Unread postby Grimnir » Sat 06 Aug 2005, 05:48:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilyMon', 'T')hink back to the Great Depression. On Black Monday or Tuesday it was not uncommon to see people throwing themselves out of thier office windows.


Ah, the good ol' days when executives comitted suicide rather than face the shame of bankrupting their companies. These days they just run out with as much cash as they can carry.
Grimnir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 851
Joined: Mon 04 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: USA

Unread postby Phil » Sat 06 Aug 2005, 06:20:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')o you think suicide rates will go up post peak crash?


It's a pleasant thought, but I doubt it will increase enough to matter, though one can hope.

What seems more likely is murder skyrocketing.
User avatar
Phil
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue 31 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Austin, TX
Top

Unread postby doufus » Sat 06 Aug 2005, 06:25:29

Indeed there would be more suicides but also more people "saved"
by a system that made more sense to them and used their skills.
However it will be VERY rough. James Michener (the author of the great
sth pacific novels) could never throw away tiny bits of soap no matter
how rich he was- he'd clump them together. I know my g/mother could
NEVER throw away food. She'd eat it after the meal was over- not because
she was hungry but after so much deprivation it was unthinkable to
throw it out. She was always slim too cos she worked so hard physically
and lived to 96. Fantastic woman.

But the coach potatoes are in for a shock as well as the rambo survivalists
with a ton of guns but not the fitness to run a km. Most of us are going
to feel the impact of manual labour. Try swinging a pick or axe for a day
and see what i mean, then back up the next day and the next.

Look at old photos of people from the 20s and 30s. Obesity was NEVER
a problem, hormone issues were nonexistent and the gymn consisted
of every hand tool in the shed.

Counting calories will not be problematic I think. And the spandex,
walkman in the ears and mineral substitute drinks will be a little
out of place.

Is there any way of estimating the energy stored in fat American
asses since this could be crucial to integrity of the ecocnomy at
some point.
User avatar
doufus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Liamj » Sat 06 Aug 2005, 11:26:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('doufus', 'I')s there any way of estimating the energy stored in fat ..
asses since this could be crucial to integrity of the ecocnomy at
some point.

Substantial reserves do exist, however political considerations still prevent exploration to prove-up the numbers. Majors are investing regardless in downstream technology, reviving the Workhouse and Slavery brands to leverage what is anticipated to be a glut of sole-contractor labour.
User avatar
Liamj
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 864
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: 145'2"E 37'46"S
Top

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Sat 06 Aug 2005, 11:35:15

Most people in the US are fat.

Think about that, the majority of the population is overweight. Meaning that the average isn't a healthy number. 8O

How exactly are these pathetic fat people going to pick up a hoe and start working on the garden?

Isn't it easier for them to complain to their Congressman to fix the problem by invading another oil rich country?

That's why I laugh a little when I hear people talk about needing 50 guns to defend themselves against the Zombie Suburbanites.

Your average soccer mom isn't going to turn into a barbarian horde leader. Most of these people haven't even seen a real gun, let alone have the ability to shoot another person.

I expect a lot of people to "camp" in their house after the bank tells them to leave. After all, where are they going to go? The family farm? :roll:

The increase in the death rate will come from the following:

The elderly who require expensive medical care.
The poor, inner city gang members who will kill each other as they have for generations.
Anyone else who requires expensive medical care.
Increased disease because of the breakdown in public health.
Anyone requiring government handouts to eat.
Anyone who has totally lost hope and sees that bottle of sleeping pills as the solution.

And of course, plenty of 18-24 year olds in oil rich "terrorist" nations.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 06 Aug 2005, 14:09:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '
')
That's why I laugh a little when I hear people talk about needing 50 guns to defend themselves against the Zombie Suburbanites.

Your average soccer mom isn't going to turn into a barbarian horde leader. Most of these people haven't even seen a real gun, let alone have the ability to shoot another person.


I'm glad I'm not the only one who just doesn't see these people getting up the gumption to become ravening hordes. I think they'll sit around or pick fights with their nearest neighbor. But I don't see them trudging dozens of miles out into the countryside (while starving, mind you) in order to "reap" what little they might be able to find there. Wouldn't it make more sense for them to stay near the stores/houses to look for food? There's nothing out here except rocks and cedar trees!

Re: suicide - change is hard for people, but I doubt suicide rates will go up much. People unless clinically depressed or psychotic usually want to live even when times are tough.
Ludi
 
Top

Unread postby Pops » Sat 06 Aug 2005, 14:40:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', ' ')

Most people can't tie a knot to save their life (or end it).



:-D

I’m not sure that many people jumped from ledges in the crash of ’29.

There are a lot of IT type people on this board who themselves or their acquaintances lost good jobs and many other folks who lost their life’s savings in the recent silicon bubble bust – I didn’t hear of many pulling the trigger.

The struggle to simply get by, should that happen on a wide scale, doesn’t seem as depressing to me as the endless struggle to get more. No wonder there is a pill out there for every possible or imagined mental malady.

When so many have so much time to sit on their butts and do nothing but pout over what they don’t have I’m not surprised to see people think they have something wrong. I’m sure there are people with physiological problems, I think there are many more with ‘I want’ problems.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Unread postby EnergySpin » Sat 06 Aug 2005, 14:59:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '
')
The struggle to simply get by, should that happen on a wide scale, doesn’t seem as depressing to me as the endless struggle to get more. No wonder there is a pill out there for every possible or imagined mental malady.

When so many have so much time to sit on their butts and do nothing but pout over what they don’t have I’m not surprised to see people think they have something wrong. I’m sure there are people with physiological problems, I think there are many more with ‘I want’ problems.

Research does support your observation pops. Check page 13 of What Can Economists Learn about Happiness :
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') relevant personality factor that might intervene is, for instance,
that individuals who prize material goods more highly than other values in life tend to be
substantially less happy (Joseph Sirgy 1997). Similarly, people whose goals are intrinsic, i.e.
those who define their values by themselves, tend to be happier than those with extrinsic
goals, i.e. those oriented towards some external reward, such as financial success or social
approval (Tim Kasser and Ryan 2001). ....
There may be many different reasons why higher income does not simply translate into higher
happiness. Without doubt, one of the most important ones is that individuals compare
themselves to other individuals. It is not the absolute level of income that matters most but
rather one’s position relative to other individuals. This idea of relative income is part of the
more general aspiration level theory. Concepts of interdependent preferences due to
comparisons with relevant others (see e.g. Gary Becker 1974; Frank 1985; and Robert Pollak
1976) supplement ideas focussing on preference changes due to comparison with, for
example, one’s past consumption level or expected future income. In economics, Easterlin (1974, 1995, 2001) uses the concept of aspirations as a frame of
reference to explain happiness. He acknowledges that people with higher income are, on
average, happier, but raising everybody’s income does not increase the everybody’s
happiness, because in comparison to others income has not improved. This interpretation of
the data is supported by laboratory findings showing the importance of relative judgements
for happiness (Richard Smith, Diener, and Douglas Wedell 1989 and Amos Tversky and Dale
Griffin 1991).
Many economists in the past have noted that individuals compare themselves to significant
others with respect to income, consumption, status or utility. Thorstein Veblen (1899) coined
the notion of “conspicuous consumption”, serving to impress other persons. The “relative
income hypothesis” has been formulated and econometrically tested by James Duesenberry
(1949), who posits an asymmetric structure of externalities. People look upwards when
making comparisons. Aspirations thus tend to be above the level reached. Wealthier people
impose a negative external effect on poorer people, but not vice versa.

Happy reading ....
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby Pops » Sat 06 Aug 2005, 15:33:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergySpin', ' ')
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')e acknowledges that people with higher income are, on average, happier, but raising everybody’s income does not increase the everybody’s happiness, because in comparison to others income has not improved.



We are a sad bunch! :-D

Thanks for that snip ES, I'm not reading anymore though; it's too depressing! :)
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Next

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron