Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

Postby Tanada » Sat 09 Jan 2010, 17:44:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Quagmire', '.')
"Why" ?
Well, Tanada...what stands at True North on your moral compass?
If you don't care about extremely intelligent fellow mammals trying to live their lives in peace while being persued to the ends of the earth by high tech ships using high tech equipment to slaughter them, then what do you care about?

Not that anyone really cares, but I see this particular thread as a litmus test of sorts. It's good to know who's who.
.


Funny but when I was growing up I was taught that answering a question with a question is rather rude. Dogs are rather intelligent fellow mammals, as are Donkeys and Gorillas. I have never eaten any of them, nor have I eaten Whale, but that is a cultural thing much more than a moral thing. I have no objection to eating Cattle, Goats, Sheep, Chickens, Geese, Turkey, Rabbit or any number of other animals.

Anthropomorphizing animals and emotionally attaching human levels of intelligence to them is a natural reaction, but that doesn't make it true. From what I have seen and read Dolphin's and Porpoise's are quite intelligent, around the same level of cognition as Chimpanzee and Gorilla and Orangutan. Whales with the exception of Killer Whales do not from any study I have seen exhibit any particularly high level of cognition, if you have a link of a study demonstrating otherwise I would be interested in seeing the data.

My moral compass says it is dead wrong to exterminate a species if it is at all possible to avoid doing so, but in the case of the Japanese Whaling ships they are only allowed to harvest a small number of Whales of specific species and they are watched every minute to keep them from cheating on those limits. It is IMO no different than any other form of modern hunting in that it is regulated, controlled and limited to a sustainable level of harvesting.

If they had a license to go after the last Blue whale I would be willing to join the people who file court papers for injunctive relief AND the people who put themselves at risk for the Whales, but that is eminently NOT the case in this situation.

If you want to stop all whale harvesting then get your country to petition the UN to change the international whaling act to say so. Or go out in a speed boat and ram a ship if that is what you believe is your moral duty. Do not, however, lecture the rest of us to live by your personal moral standard. Doing so is no different than a Hindu and a Muslim attacking one another because they disagree about what is the right way to live and what happens when we die. That kind of 'moralizing' has not served anyone well at any time in history, as India and Pakistan. Or ask Mormon's or Jews who disagreed with the majority faith in the past or present. Or heck anyone at all who disagrees with the majority view on a wide range of 'moral' issues.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

Postby Ludi » Sat 09 Jan 2010, 17:57:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', '
')
If they had a license to go after the last Blue whale I would be willing to join the people who file court papers for injunctive relief AND the people who put themselves at risk for the Whales, but that is eminently NOT the case in this situation.



I guess I'm wondering why you would wait until they were going after the last Blue Whale.

How many whales "should" there be?

How many humans "should" there be?
Ludi
 

Re: Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

Postby shortonsense » Sat 09 Jan 2010, 18:02:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'F')irst notice my last post. The curse has been left for quite a while. Where Shortonballs goes chaos follows. The moderator has done nothing, suggesting either disgust with Short or with this entire enterprise.


Actually, I think it shows what should be obvious. You substitute foul language for thought because you apparently assign value to such things. Perhaps you were taught tactics like this at some fine school of secondary education, but it is more likely that you are just incapable of generating a single independent thought of higher value than 4 letter words.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '
')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', '
')Excellent!! And kudo's for your dedication to the cause....or all the causes!! That protesting Hiroshima 30 years after it happened...pretty cool, I've got a picture with the kids by the Enola Gay myself.....anyway.....
I protested (and was arrested many times) the destruction of the last ancient redwood forests that gave the US the Headwaters Preserve. It is a private act. Not for show. You nothing of real sacrifice. You are a weakling.


Not usually one to argue with those with arrest records, but lets not go TOO far there pstarr. While my athletic days admittedly ended many moons ago, I don't quite qualify for your latest attempt at humor. But call me chrome dome, THAT would at least be a true statement, thereby qualifying as a rarity from your keyboard.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '
')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shorty', 'E')ither way....keep up the good work....without people crewing the ship, what would the Animal Planet Channel do for some decent reality programming....emit no CO2 and concentrate on something effective?
You deny GW. Stay on subject.


My belief system is irrelevant to the hypocrisy of the Greens, as noted by SeaGypsy. Noting such hypocrisy is completely reasonable. Or did you miss my reference to a cost/benefit analysis and get confused over the terminology because I didn't provide a wiki reference to explain it for you?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '
')But this crime pales compared to the mass-extinction resulting from widespread habitat loss. When I fought Horowitz and Pacific Lumber I was not even considering GW, just the idiotic abuse of our legacy and the economy of the region. Cut and run is not a long-term business model you want to bequeath on your children.


blah blah blah, cutting down a tree and allowing it to regrow has never been defined as "idiotic abuse" by anyone other than you. Al Gore, otherwise known as "Mr Green Incarnate", certainly thinks that carbon offsets through tree planting are a completely reasonable way to counteract human CO2 emissions, his in particular.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '
')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', 'P')S: You wouldn't be the skinny fellow with a scraggly beard who recently took over as XO are you? The only reason I ask is that my daughter thinks he's cute, if its you, could I PM you for a way to get an autograph?Your daughter will grow up to be ashamed of you.

Are you kidding? I already catch hell for not buying a Prius for the family, her and mom are dropping off recyclables as I type this. One of the beauties of suburbia.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

Postby Tanada » Sat 09 Jan 2010, 19:00:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', '
')
If they had a license to go after the last Blue whale I would be willing to join the people who file court papers for injunctive relief AND the people who put themselves at risk for the Whales, but that is eminently NOT the case in this situation.



I guess I'm wondering why you would wait until they were going after the last Blue Whale.

How many whales "should" there be?

How many humans "should" there be?


In both cases the correct answer is, a SUSTAINABLE number. Too few and inbreeding destroys the genetic viability of the species, too many and they overshoot and crash.

The problem is some people believe that all animals except humans should maintain their maximum possible population at all times, which is impossible because they compete for resources with each other and with humans.

I used the Blue Whale as an example because they were hunted to darn near extinction, which is criminal in my opinion. Minke whales, the main species hunted by the infamous Japanese ships, number in the millions and are not in any way endangered as a species by the very limited whaling which goes on. Population data for the Minke whales suggests that their population has increased to fill the ecosystem holes left by the extinction and/or severe reduction in other species of whale from uncontrolled over hunting in the past.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

Postby Ludi » Sat 09 Jan 2010, 19:25:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', '
')The problem is some people believe that all animals except humans should maintain their maximum possible population at all times, which is impossible because they compete for resources with each other and with humans.



Which of the whales are competing with humans for resources? Which humans are they competing with? Aren't the humans competing for a lot more resources than the whales are?

What's a "sustainable" number of whales? What's a "sustainable" number of humans? Why would the humans be necessary as predators for whales, specifically Blue Whales, which evolved millions of years before humans developed the technology to hunt them? Where is the evidence that whales need to be hunted by humans to keep their numbers "sustainable"? Or are you only referring to the minke whales? What evidence the minke whales are excessive in number if they have increased to fill niches vacated by extinct whales? Is the hunting being done to preserve competing whale species or to preserve commercial fishing, which we know to a large degree is not being done sustainably? Should humans kill whales in order to preserve an unsustainable activity?

These are questions I wonder about. :cry:
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

Postby Ludi » Sat 09 Jan 2010, 19:37:47

"Research by Japan’s Whale Research Program in the Northwest Pacific has revealed that whales eat huge amounts of fisheries resources.

It is estimated that whales consume approximately three to five times as much marine resources as the world’s yearly marine fisheries production volume. (The exact amount varies depending on the yearly marine fisheries production output).

Besides eating Krill, which is also food for fish, whales eat a large amount of Anchovies, Mackerel, Saury, Salmon, Squid and Walleye pollack. Furthermore, it has become clear that whales feast on certain types of fish during their most prolific season. Japan as a fishing nation cannot overlook this issue."

http://www.sydney.au.emb-japan.go.jp/Whaling2.html

apparently, whales eat too much :|
Ludi
 

Re: Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

Postby shortonsense » Sat 09 Jan 2010, 20:00:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '&')quot;Research by Japan’s Whale Research Program in the Northwest Pacific has revealed that whales eat huge amounts of fisheries resources.

It is estimated that whales consume approximately three to five times as much marine resources as the world’s yearly marine fisheries production volume. (The exact amount varies depending on the yearly marine fisheries production output).

Besides eating Krill, which is also food for fish, whales eat a large amount of Anchovies, Mackerel, Saury, Salmon, Squid and Walleye pollack. Furthermore, it has become clear that whales feast on certain types of fish during their most prolific season. Japan as a fishing nation cannot overlook this issue."

http://www.sydney.au.emb-japan.go.jp/Whaling2.html

apparently, whales eat too much :|


OMG!!! And there I was, feeling sorry or the whales....when they are interfering with humankinds ability to mine the oceans for even MORE carrying capacity!!!! WHERE IS MY HARPOON!!!!

Disclaimer for the humorous challenged:

For those who don't recognize it, or take themselves or their ideas way too seriously, that was meant as humor.... :lol:
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

Postby Quagmire » Sat 09 Jan 2010, 20:01:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Quagmire', '.')
"Why" ?
Well, Tanada...what stands at True North on your moral compass?
If you don't care about extremely intelligent fellow mammals trying to live their lives in peace while being persued to the ends of the earth by high tech ships using high tech equipment to slaughter them, then what do you care about?

Not that anyone really cares, but I see this particular thread as a litmus test of sorts. It's good to know who's who.
.


Funny but when I was growing up I was taught that answering a question with a question is rather rude. Dogs are rather intelligent fellow mammals, as are Donkeys and Gorillas. I have never eaten any of them, nor have I eaten Whale, but that is a cultural thing much more than a moral thing. I have no objection to eating Cattle, Goats, Sheep, Chickens, Geese, Turkey, Rabbit or any number of other animals.

Anthropomorphizing animals and emotionally attaching human levels of intelligence to them is a natural reaction, but that doesn't make it true. From what I have seen and read Dolphin's and Porpoise's are quite intelligent, around the same level of cognition as Chimpanzee and Gorilla and Orangutan. Whales with the exception of Killer Whales do not from any study I have seen exhibit any particularly high level of cognition, if you have a link of a study demonstrating otherwise I would be interested in seeing the data.

My moral compass says it is dead wrong to exterminate a species if it is at all possible to avoid doing so, but in the case of the Japanese Whaling ships they are only allowed to harvest a small number of Whales of specific species and they are watched every minute to keep them from cheating on those limits. It is IMO no different than any other form of modern hunting in that it is regulated, controlled and limited to a sustainable level of harvesting.

If they had a license to go after the last Blue whale I would be willing to join the people who file court papers for injunctive relief AND the people who put themselves at risk for the Whales, but that is eminently NOT the case in this situation.

If you want to stop all whale harvesting then get your country to petition the UN to change the international whaling act to say so. Or go out in a speed boat and ram a ship if that is what you believe is your moral duty. Do not, however, lecture the rest of us to live by your personal moral standard. Doing so is no different than a Hindu and a Muslim attacking one another because they disagree about what is the right way to live and what happens when we die. That kind of 'moralizing' has not served anyone well at any time in history, as India and Pakistan. Or ask Mormon's or Jews who disagreed with the majority faith in the past or present. Or heck anyone at all who disagrees with the majority view on a wide range of 'moral' issues.


It was in a sense a rhetorical question, but equally on the other hand, it was a serious question. What does stand at True North on your moral compass?
I'm listening.

What I'm hearing so far is that it's okay with you for humans to go out and slaughter any creature less "intelligent" than man as long as a 'sustainable' breeding population is left... And for any purpose or no purpose, as long as it was decided by a human, because they know best.
Actually, you needn't bother answering.There's a paradigm breach here too wide to cross.
.
User avatar
Quagmire
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat 07 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

Postby Ludi » Sat 09 Jan 2010, 20:09:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Quagmire', 'T')here's a paradigm breach here too wide to cross.
.



I guess what I'm wondering is - why is it ok to decide a million minke whales (or 700,000 or whatever number) is an ok or "sustainable" number of minke whales and we can kill the extras, while deciding nearly 7 billion humans might not be enough and we need to keep breeding more or not particularly discourage breeding more, or at least not mention nearly 7 billion might be too many? Why is it ok to decide some number of whales is "sustainable" and more of them might be eating food the humans want, when perhaps the humans have exceeded their carrying capacity by several times? This pretty much goes for any animals species - why is it ok to decide "x numbers of x animal is plenty and we can kill the extras", and not ok to say "nearly 7 billion humans is too many and we need to get serious about ending human population growth." Seems like the humans get a free pass, and the other animals get a quota.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

Postby Quagmire » Sat 09 Jan 2010, 21:28:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Quagmire', 'T')here's a paradigm breach here too wide to cross.
.



I guess what I'm wondering is - why is it ok to decide a million minke whales (or 700,000 or whatever number) is an ok or "sustainable" number of minke whales and we can kill the extras, while deciding nearly 7 billion humans might not be enough and we need to keep breeding more or not particularly discourage breeding more, or at least not mention nearly 7 billion might be too many? Why is it ok to decide some number of whales is "sustainable" and more of them might be eating food the humans want, when perhaps the humans have exceeded their carrying capacity by several times? This pretty much goes for any animals species - why is it ok to decide "x numbers of x animal is plenty and we can kill the extras", and not ok to say "nearly 7 billion humans is too many and we need to get serious about ending human population growth." Seems like the humans get a free pass, and the other animals get a quota.


Money. The International Whaling Coalition is controlled by money interests.
The quotas they come up with are governed by money and hubris with the immediate motivation being short term profit.

Most of us humans are imprisoned in our own skins and our own heads. Those of us who aren't are mutants of sorts, and a distinct minority. On the one hand human centrism is a survival mechanism, or has been up until now.
But I think it's also the root cause of the larger problem. Yeast are the same, eating out to the edge of the petree dish without any regard to anything non-yeasty. Probably most animals are self centric, ( although elephants are famous for displaying compassion beyond their own species ). I had just always hoped that humans could one day see beyond the veil, but it looks like we'll never get the chance to evolve any further than we already have.
.
Last edited by Quagmire on Sat 09 Jan 2010, 22:08:05, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Quagmire
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat 07 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

Postby SeaGypsy » Sat 09 Jan 2010, 21:51:20

A few points here:

1/ (Tanada) all the animals you say you eat are FARMED, unlike whales. I guess you probably eat fish from the wild, maybe a little venison?

2/ Whales have sex like us, give birth like us, suckle their young like us and NURTURE THEIR YOUNG FOR MANY YEARS LIKE US.

3/ When the dolphins who do all those amazing tricks at theme parks, does that not make you think of their peculiar ability to be trained to perform? Does not this performance paralell human gymnastics?

4/ These performing dolphins are the 5% of the caught dolphins which survive in captivity. It is widely thought in the industry that these are the least intelligent of those caught and that most of those 95% who die, die from DEPRESSION.

6/ There is no evidence that other cetaceans are less intelligent than dolphins.

7/ Japan has no traditional hunting grounds in the Southern Ocean.

8/ The IWC is a farce where tiny carribean island countries get an equal vote to the USA or Australia. These skinflint countries are PAID BY JAPAN TO VOTE AFFIRMATIVE FOR THEIR BOGUS SCIENTIFIC WHALING PROGRAM.

9/ Who is watching Japan doing this other than a single IWC 'observer' per ship or the Sea Shepherd fleet?
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

Postby Tanada » Sat 09 Jan 2010, 23:03:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'A') few points here:

1/ (Tanada) all the animals you say you eat are FARMED, unlike whales. I guess you probably eat fish from the wild, maybe a little venison?
Correct in all aspects.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
2/ Whales have sex like us, give birth like us, suckle their young like us and NURTURE THEIR YOUNG FOR MANY YEARS LIKE US.
Not all species do things for many years. Those that do, do so because their young need help fending off predators for some time as they grow. Bears, Elephants, and several other varieties of mammal also nurture their young for long periods of time but that doesn't make them uniquely in need of protection, or does it?$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
3/ When the dolphins who do all those amazing tricks at theme parks, does that not make you think of their peculiar ability to be trained to perform? Does not this performance parallel human gymnastics?
No it doesn't, you are anthropomorphizing to a very large extent. Dolphins in the wild also do many of the 'tricks' that they do in captivity upon a signal from the trainer. I am referring to leaps and cartwheels and such, they are exuberant creatures and love to leap out of the water and do things in mid air. Many animals can be trained to preform, though most of them are harder to train, have you ever been to the Rodeo or a Circus? Horses, Bears, Elephants etc,etc... All of them are routinely trained to preform, not to mention Seals which I have seen trained to do most of the same tricks a Dolphin can do plus a couple of others that come from the differences in each species anatomy. As far as that goes the duties of a Sheep Dog or of a Guard Llama taking care of a herd are quite useful trained behaviors, should we comport to them human levels of intelligence as a result? A good cow Pony excels at herding a group of cattle with minor guidance of a human rider, they know how to read the body language of the human upon them to anticipate which way to go and what gait to travel at. The rider and the mount come to act as a single unit, yet there can be no instinctive knowledge preparing a pony or horse to be ridden as a mount. It is all training and learned behavior, and yet they act as one unit.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
4/ These performing dolphins are the 5% of the caught dolphins which survive in captivity. It is widely thought in the industry that these are the least intelligent of those caught and that most of those 95% who die, die from DEPRESSION.
Perhaps, but it is just as possible that the persons making these statements are attempting to psychologically evaluate a completely different species and improperly interpreting the results because they have a human point of view. That is not an accusation, it is merely a recognition of the bias that we all have do to our individual world views.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
5/ Hey where did 5 go?$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
6/ There is no evidence that other cetaceans are less intelligent than dolphins.
Point to the evidence that they are as smart or smarter than Dolphins and Porpoises, you can not prove a negative so saying their is no proof against is meaningless.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
7/ Japan has no traditional hunting grounds in the Southern Ocean.
Correct 100% agreed.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
8/ The IWC is a farce where tiny carribean island countries get an equal vote to the USA or Australia. These skinflint countries are PAID BY JAPAN TO VOTE AFFIRMATIVE FOR THEIR BOGUS SCIENTIFIC WHALING PROGRAM.
True as far as it goes, however the USA has also used its influence to get other countries to take its side in IWC actions. I don't find it surprising in the least that humans are corrupt and seek to corrupt others in their favor. It stinks but reality is as it is, not as we wish it would be.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
9/ Who is watching Japan doing this other than a single IWC 'observer' per ship or the Sea Shepherd fleet?
So you believe that all of the IWC observers are corrupted? While I suspect some of them might be the countries opposed to Whaling are hardly going to let observers be there whom they can not trust. The observers are the eyes and ears of the IWC, and the majority of the IWC wants to ban commercial whaling permanently, they are not so foolish as to be blind to what Japan's fleet does. As a matter of fact their observers have dutifully reported several times against Japan when they have exceeded catch limits and such. After watching a season of Whale Wars shot on the Steve Irwin I have zero faith in the reliability of the Sea Shepherds reports on the situation, everything they say is slanted to garner sympathy and emotional responses from the audience, not as a report of things as they might appear to an unbiased outside observer. It might make for overly dramatic TV and news headlines, but it is a lousy way to judge a situation and find out what is actually occurring.

I think that my perspective, and that of Pop's and most likely Ludi are different than that of most people on PO.com because I grew up around farm animals. I love my pets and I treated my livestock well because I do not believe in being needlessly cruel to any living thing. However when it came time to slaughter the animals on the farm hesitating was a form of cruelty, you not only make yourself suffer pointless emotion over what needs to be done, if you botch it the first time you make the animal suffer needlessly before it passes on. I heard a saying a lot growing up that applies here, $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') lot of people that eat meat could not work in a slaughterhouse.

Anthropomorphizing as I have said before is all well and good, but if you bind yourself up emotionally with an animal it is a pet, not Wild and not Livestock. People on this thread are making (in my opinion) pets of wild animals in their own minds, emotionally adopting them into the 'family' as it were. Wild animals are wild and deserve to roam free as long as they live, treating them like pets doesn't help them or you. A pet is a slave, a kind of honorary human that we keep around and keep control of. A Wild animal is free and earns that status by acting free and in its own best interest to the best of its ability. Pets are slaves that eat what we provide when we provide it and who get punished if they displease us with their behavior and rewarded for making us feel important. A pet like a Dog will place the best interest of its master ahead of its own best interest, many times and in many ways if it lives a long life. A wild Wolf on the other hand will hang out with a human while the relationship is mutually beneficial, but if things go sour the Wolf leaves.

Enough, either you understand that I am observing this situation without emotional attachment, or you do not and typing more on the topic won't change that either way.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

Postby SeaGypsy » Sat 09 Jan 2010, 23:47:37

5/ Whale numbers are estimated to have recovered to less than 20% of pre hunting numbers broadly speaking since whaling was largely banned in the 1960's 70's. Does this mean there were too many before but now enough to hunt them again.

Nothing can compare with the performance of dolphins, no animal has the agility and coordination. The ones which die early in their captivity refuse to eat, fail to thrive and are dead very quickly. They also refuse to breed in captivity. Less than 5 cetaceans have ever been successfully bred in captivity.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

Postby SeaGypsy » Sun 10 Jan 2010, 02:24:20

So anyway Tanada, is dispassionate thinking the new black?
I suppose you believe in arranged marriage, howabout forced sterilisation?
Compassion where expedient?
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

Postby Pretorian » Sun 10 Jan 2010, 05:22:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', 'A')nthropomorphizing animals and emotionally attaching human levels of intelligence to them is a natural reaction, but that doesn't make it true. From what I have seen and read Dolphin's and Porpoise's are quite intelligent, around the same level of cognition as Chimpanzee and Gorilla and Orangutan.


An.. anthr.. argh sorry too many letters, can't wrap around a word so complex around my simple head. I would guess , my vocational school wasnt as good as yours. However, in mine, we had a biology class.
I kinda doubt if it was more useful than your ability to spell fancy words, but at least we were taught how to spot an animal when you see one. You see , first you have to look if the creature can feed itself. If that is a no, then, you have to look whether it can move freely at any stage of its pathetic parasitic/murderous existence. Finally you have to check whether it's cells have mitochondria, formed nucleous and some of the other latest cellular updates.
You know Tanada, I have a strong feeling /suspicion that you are an animal. Have you ever tested your cells for presence of mitochondria and other bells and whistles? You should. Cause if there are any it will prove that you are an animal. Just like any other ape.

Interesting that you find cognition and intelligence in general as a legitimate measure of who kills what and to what degree. There are millions of people in the world whose intelligence levels are lower than ones of (billions?) of animals. What should we do with them? Should we harvest them for internal organs? Should we eat them? Should we feed them to each other?
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

Postby Ludi » Sun 10 Jan 2010, 15:26:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'S')o anyway Tanada, is dispassionate thinking the new black?
I suppose you believe in arranged marriage, howabout forced sterilisation?
Compassion where expedient?



I'm not sure why it's important to be dispassionate about things. Isn't passion, love, empathy human also? Or are we supposed to be robots? Humans are animals, similar to many other animals. Must we reserve empathy for human animals alone? Why? Are empathy and esthetic appreciation of other animals not considered "enlightened" enough or something?

Can we decide we want to protect animals because we love and appreciate them, or does there have to be a "dispassionate scientific reason"? What is the dispassionate scientific reason there needs to be nearly 7 billion humans but only a few million whales?
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

Postby SeaGypsy » Sun 10 Jan 2010, 17:24:30

While my reaction to Tanada may be seen as over the top, I do find this poster a paradox. On the one hand advocating for radical nuclearisation of energy systems to potentially save humanity from dieoff; on the other unable to acknowlege the prime paralell species on this planet, cetaceans.

These creatures are to the oceans what we are (at best) to the land. To me and millions of others, this is an obvious fact. Calling this anthropomorphisation is, as Pretorian points out, using big words to desensitise murder of our closest water borne relations.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

Postby Quagmire » Sun 10 Jan 2010, 20:44:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'S')o anyway Tanada, is dispassionate thinking the new black?
I suppose you believe in arranged marriage, howabout forced sterilisation?
Compassion where expedient?



I'm not sure why it's important to be dispassionate about things. Isn't passion, love, empathy human also? Or are we supposed to be robots? Humans are animals, similar to many other animals. Must we reserve empathy for human animals alone? Why? Are empathy and esthetic appreciation of other animals not considered "enlightened" enough or something?

Can we decide we want to protect animals because we love and appreciate them, or does there have to be a "dispassionate scientific reason"? What is the dispassionate scientific reason there needs to be nearly 7 billion humans but only a few million whales?


I want answers to these questions too for therein lies the root of our problem - the one that got us in into this overshoot/ resource depletion / dying planet mess.

BTW there is a book called
In the Heart of the Sea: The Tragedy of the Whaleship Essex by Nathaniel Philbrook that relates the true story of the incidents that inspired Melville's Moby Dick. In 1819 a whaleship out of Nantucket was rammed and sunk by a very large sperm whale whose mate had just been murdered by this crew.
.
User avatar
Quagmire
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat 07 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

Postby SeaGypsy » Sun 10 Jan 2010, 23:57:25

I lived in Byron Bay for 15 years. Byron has a nice high headland for whalewatching and draws many thousands of visitors to Australia's easternmost point to watch the biannual humpback migration.
Byron also has several resident dolphin clusters. I grew up surfing with these wonderfull animals and learned many things from them.
One day about 20 years ago a guy was windsurfing at the main point of the bay. A dolphin was playing on the same wave and this hotshot windsurfer swung his boom around to smack the dolphin in the head. A few seconds later a dolphin (the same one or not?) leaped out of the water into this dude's jaw, smashing it and knocking him off his board. Doubtless that was the last time he showed agression to the kings of the surf.
It is my personal belief that these creatures are psychic, that they communicate telepathicly with each other and with sensitive human beings. I am not just talking about loving feelings such as dogs and horses (even pigs) are capable of arousing, but very deep subliminal messaging.
I suppose I'm really anthropomorphising there!
Swimming with dolphins has shown to be effective in treating both autism and depression.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Japanese sink Anti Whaling Ship/ Adi Gil

Postby shortonsense » Mon 11 Jan 2010, 01:44:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', '
')One day about 20 years ago a guy was windsurfing at the main point of the bay. A dolphin was playing on the same wave and this hotshot windsurfer swung his boom around to smack the dolphin in the head. A few seconds later a dolphin (the same one or not?) leaped out of the water into this dude's jaw, smashing it and knocking him off his board. Doubtless that was the last time he showed agression to the kings of the surf.
It is my personal belief that these creatures are psychic, that they communicate telepathicly with each other and with sensitive human beings.


Psychic dolphins! I like it!!!

Any chance this year on Whale Wars, when we have the footage of those nasty harpooners taking out a whale like they did last season, we will see a corresponding mass whale attack on the harpooner? Now THAT would be some TV!

I suppose this particular claimed psychic ability is maybe allergic to movie cameras?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Seagypsy', '
')Swimming with dolphins has shown to be effective in treating both autism and depression.


I'm sure you believe this. I don't suppose you've got a decent science link somewhere validating it? I know that hospitals or medical facilities have sometimes thought that the presence of domesticated dogs and cats and such has a calming influence on the ill and such, and no offense on the validity of your psychic dolphin story, but you can understand the skepticism from non-believers who haven't seen these mythical beasts in action, can't you?
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron