Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

illegal

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Unread postby Olaf » Sat 07 May 2005, 01:38:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Raphael', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t occurred to me that I don't want to share this info too much! Smile

Olaf

Previous post completely removed.


Homeland Gestapo concerns?

Namaste


Well, it is an open forum, and not everyone is always as they seem. After all, the screen is not transparent.

Olaf
Olaf
 

Unread postby pongle » Sat 07 May 2005, 02:23:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('some_guy282', 'I') think this whole discussion of drugs/alcohol in regards to Peak Oil is actually very interesting. Oil and drugs/alcohol have one thing in common with some people: inelastic demand. Addicts absolutely must have it no matter what the price. When supply chains of goods across the country (including illegal ones) starts to break down, the price of illegal drugs and even cigarettes could possibly soar even faster than oil does.

How will the average person be able to afford their cigarettes/beer/weed when they can barely afford to buy food? You can add withdrawl pain/anxiety to the large list of things that will create problems and make people very angry when things start to get bad.

How bad smoking weed is now is debatable. But I think in light of Peak Oil everyone should be in agreement that it's a pretty stupid habit to continue. Don't get me wrong, I'm milking as much fun from our society right now as I possibly can. Videogames are my personal vice. But I can walk away from the Xbox just fine without being left with any physical symptoms.

If you smoke weed now, do you think you'll still be able to afford to when things start to get bad? Even if you could, do you think it would be a wise thing to spend your money on? I know withdrawl symptoms from weed aren't as dramatic as those of other harder drugs, but when would you rather go through withdrawl? Now, or when TSHTF?


Well.. when talking about chronic (ab)use of black-market pot, then yea, I agree. But homegrown weed could be a very valuable asset. It can be traded for food, or used in moderation for leisure or medicine, and there is no withdrawal if it is not consumed all the time. If there is a situation where oil-based medicines are no longer available, weed will come in very handy.

I think it is sad that the currently distributed (mis)information about weed is so black and white. either you don't smoke at all or are a chronic pothead.. its not crack you know :)

Image
User avatar
pongle
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri 06 May 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Ayoob_Reloaded » Sat 07 May 2005, 02:58:45

Pot is not as bad as either alcohol or cigarettes, methinks.
User avatar
Ayoob_Reloaded
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 355
Joined: Tue 07 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby Schneider » Sat 07 May 2005, 08:41:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Raphael', 'Y')ou've got to wonder about the priorities of society when there has been a 100% increase in children under the age of five being administered ritalin, but an adult can't smoke pot.


Yeah,kinda insane to watch this here in Quebec province..We are the province with the greatest use of Ritalin for God Sake 8O ! Overcrowed class with teachers unable to talk to everyone,young childreen (especially young males) full of energy who can't stand to sit for hours ,mainly because we don't give them enough hours by weeks for physical education (actually,they wonder why we got an increase of obesity !!Shit,we are making generations of fat obeses with brains who will die young,glargh..) and by a massive overdose of sugar everywhere in their food !!!

Not counting that in our crazy age,many people nor have the energy nor enough time to take care of their childreens,so they put them in front of the TV :cry: (and don't forget that a large part of the young child not in age to go to school are going to the government nurseries of Pauline Marois) ..

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Raphael', '
')
Most alcoholics cannot stand this kind of introspection, this sense of loneliness. That is why you find bars full of people who cannot stand to be with themselves.



So true ! My father was like that most of is lifetime..Now,since 3 months he have stopped to take alcohol..Basically,he have touch the bottom and have saw he was now,really alone and the end of his life and he's trying to change that :) ! Make me remember i should go see him soon..

Oh,by the way,thx for the nice words :oops: ...

Schneider
French-Canadian
User avatar
Schneider
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 503
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada/Quebec Province
Top

Unread postby Kingcoal » Sat 07 May 2005, 10:52:43

I've noticed that marijuana makes people dumb and believing in conspiracy theories. I think you're better off without it. Of course it's probably not much worse than alcohol.
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Unread postby Chuckmak » Sat 07 May 2005, 19:14:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Schneider', '
')Hmm,i know some people who will make some money then :-D .. As about paying for pot,wise smokers don't buy their little vice; they grow it


of course!!! :)
"if god doesn't exist, it is necessary that we invent him" - Voltaire

"they say prescott bush funded hitler" - Nas

Image
Chuckmak
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat 19 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Bridge City
Top

On second thought...

Unread postby TWilliam » Sat 07 May 2005, 20:12:09

Nevermind. I was going to endeavor to offer a bit of enlightenment regarding the innocuousness (and the incomparable usefulness!!)of the Sacred Herb, but, hey, it's already been done quite well methinks. Suffice to say that the real issue anyway is responsibility: any "object" can become a focus of irresponsible/addictive behavior. And as far as that goes, marijuana is one of the most benign of such objects...
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 07 May 2005, 20:33:31

I'm hoping in post-peak world people will feel comfortable with growing and using all manner of useful herbs in a safe and "responsible" way. I hope seeds of useful and relaxing plants will be widely distributed. :)
Ludi
 

Unread postby eric_b » Sat 07 May 2005, 20:46:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('some_guy282', '
')
How will the average person be able to afford their cigarettes/beer/weed when they can barely afford to buy food? You can add withdrawl pain/anxiety to the large list of things that will create problems and make people very angry when things start to get bad.



(...)
Last edited by eric_b on Sun 08 May 2005, 04:14:07, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
eric_b
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1174
Joined: Fri 14 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: us
Top

Unread postby chargrove » Sun 08 May 2005, 01:19:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')ee, and here I was thinking that drugs completely altered your thought process and made you do things you normally wouldn't do if you weren't under their influence.

It's important to have your intentions set up firmly in your mind before you start dosing on whatever you're going to take. The people who lose control on mind-altering drugs often do so because either A) they don't know enough about what they're taking to know what they're in for and to deal with its ebbs and flows, and/or B) they didn't reinforce their intentions beforehand, so once things get going strong they don't understand what they're doing or why (this is particularly an issue with psychedelics).

You can have a lot of fun and go through a lot of therapeutic introspection on a variety of chemicals, including weed (i put weed and psychedelic entheogens/entactogens in the positive category, and alcohol/opiates/cocaine/etc in a negative category which should be avoided). But the positive chemicals will only be positive in this way if you understand them and respect them going in (in fact, some stronger psychedelics like salvia divinorum and ayahuasca absolutely demand your respect, and you have no choice in the matter; people who've taken these will know what i'm talking about).
User avatar
chargrove
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby some_guy282 » Sun 08 May 2005, 04:10:42

I think some of you are taking exceptions to the rule and broadly applying them to nearly everyone.

Can you grow weed now and have enough for yourself without spending any money on it? Sure. Will some people still be able to do this after the peak, even if TSHTF? Absolutely. Does this mean that's what the majority of people do now? NO. Granted, I don't have any hard #'s from studies or anything, but I bet that the vast majority of people who smoke weed (90% +) have to buy it from someone else. When transportation is disrupted, weed is going to suffer the same problem everything else will: too much demand and not enough supply. Somebody (maybe even a lot of somebodies) isn't going to be able to get their fix.

As far as people using drugs "responsibly", I know it can happen. There are people capable of using drugs (weed and other more hard core stuff) and controlling their lives entirely. If you're one of these people, more power to you. But as far as trying to put most (or even many) drug users in this category... give me a break. I think people who are responsible enough to think about and control the way they use drugs wouldn't be using drugs in the first place. Of course there are always exceptions.

For the record, I don't think weed should be illegal. I don't thnk it's any worse than smoking or drinking, both of which are legal. Although I choose not to do drugs myself, I think the war on drugs is bullshit.
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule. – Nietzsche

Time makes more converts than reason. – Thomas Paine

History is a set of lies agreed upon. – Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
some_guy282
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 651
Joined: Sun 18 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby pongle » Sun 08 May 2005, 16:20:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('some_guy282', 'I') think some of you are taking exceptions to the rule and broadly applying them to nearly everyone.

Can you grow weed now and have enough for yourself without spending any money on it? Sure. Will some people still be able to do this after the peak, even if TSHTF? Absolutely. Does this mean that's what the majority of people do now? NO. Granted, I don't have any hard #'s from studies or anything, but I bet that the vast majority of people who smoke weed (90% +) have to buy it from someone else. When transportation is disrupted, weed is going to suffer the same problem everything else will: too much demand and not enough supply. Somebody (maybe even a lot of somebodies) isn't going to be able to get their fix.


True. But i think a somewhat bigger problem may be the nicotine addicts without their fix than the potheads.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('some_guy282', '
')As far as people using drugs "responsibly", I know it can happen. There are people capable of using drugs (weed and other more hard core stuff) and controlling their lives entirely. If you're one of these people, more power to you. But as far as trying to put most (or even many) drug users in this category... give me a break. I think people who are responsible enough to think about and control the way they use drugs wouldn't be using drugs in the first place. Of course there are always exceptions.


I believe one important question about using substances responsibly is the addiction potential the stuff in question entails. Nicotine is one of the hardest to use casually, while caffeine or pot are on the easier side. Also the culture around consuming the stuff has a great effect on how large percentage of those who use, use it irresponsibly. Roughly multiplying the addiction potential with the legal consequences you get the price of the stuff, and the more expensive it is, the more trouble will ensue when the hapless fellow must beg borrow or steal for the nasty habit.

About most people using these things irresponsibly: i think that much more people are involved in these things than meets the eye. The loudest, most problematic and most annoying people always show up most. The ones who have problems are easy to spot and create the reputation for their hobby, while the ones that can handle their stuff just stroll along without being noticed.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('some_guy282', '
')For the record, I don't think weed should be illegal. I don't thnk it's any worse than smoking or drinking, both of which are legal. Although I choose not to do drugs myself, I think the war on drugs is bullshit.


It sure is.
User avatar
pongle
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri 06 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby TWilliam » Sun 15 May 2005, 18:46:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('some_guy282', '
')As far as people using drugs "responsibly", I know it can happen. There are people capable of using drugs (weed and other more hard core stuff) and controlling their lives entirely. If you're one of these people, more power to you. But as far as trying to put most (or even many) drug users in this category... give me a break. I think people who are responsible enough to think about and control the way they use drugs wouldn't be using drugs in the first place. Of course there are always exceptions.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pongle', 'A')bout most people using these things irresponsibly: i think that much more people are involved in these things than meets the eye. The loudest, most problematic and most annoying people always show up most. The ones who have problems are easy to spot and create the reputation for their hobby, while the ones that can handle their stuff just stroll along without being noticed.


Pongle is quite correct on this one. Those who study the issue in depth know that it is in fact a very small minority --something less than 10%-- of users of all such substances that have problems with them. People too often forget that "news" is by definition, the aberrant, the unusual, the atypical, and thus come to believe that what they see/hear from "fair-and-balanced" Fox is representative, when it is quite the opposite.
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby Bytesmiths » Sun 15 May 2005, 19:36:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TWilliam', 'P')eople too often forget that "news" is by definition, the aberrant, the unusual, the atypical, and thus come to believe that what they see/hear from "fair-and-balanced" Fox is representative, when it is quite the opposite.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bill Moyers', 'N')ews is what powerful people don’t want you to hear; everything else is just publicity.
Too bad he retired. I always have the feeling that ex-Marketplace hack who replaced him is always pulling his punches in a way Bill never would have.
:::: Jan Steinman, Communication Steward, EcoReality, a forming sustainable community. Be the change! ::::
User avatar
Bytesmiths
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 730
Joined: Wed 27 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Salt Spring Island, Cascadia
Top

Re: "i don't do drugs...just weed" (C) dave chapel

Unread postby Lukethedrifter » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 21:47:56

If a result of Peak Oil, and the economic crash, is that government will break down or be too busy to worry about people growing pot, then I'm looking forward to it. I can take care of myself, and I can enjoy taking care of myself if I can go to the backyard and pick my buds to smoke. For that....I can't wait.
User avatar
Lukethedrifter
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue 23 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Wed 24 Aug 2005, 00:32:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mryan', '
')A phyical object is inheirently neutral and cannot be good or bad. Is a gun good or bad? No. it is a piece of metal. Is a flower good? No, it is a collection of tissue and organic matter. Is weed good, is it bad? No, it is a substance which alters how you think, and how you feel. In fact, I am high right now.
ImageNot all substances are good from our perspective. A physical object can be very bad: consider a Mack Truck coming at you 70 mph and you can't get out of the way. Consider venom. Of course THC isn't that bad.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron