by Ferretlover » Sun 12 Aug 2007, 15:19:34
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'S')ome of us have been (trying) discussing this stuff here for years now. There's no need to reinvent the wheel. Discussion is good, but, like I say, there's no need to reinvent the wheel. Check out the Planning forum. "Rules for what to expect"? I'm not even sure what that means...

Ludi, as I have not been here for years, I would have no way of knowing what has and has not been discussed . I am slowly wading through what archives are available. I have no desire to reinvent the wheel (unless, of course, it makes me a great deal of money so that I can afford the bugout place I want to have!! ) , but, it seems to me the tires that have been invented are about to be replaced.
Discussion is indeed good-isn't that why we are here? To figure out how we got into this mess, how this mess is going to transpire, how to survive this mess, and how not to repeat our mistakes?
I have checked out all the planning forums. I can make lists of things to hoard as well as, if not better, than most. Unfortunately, many presentations of ideas are like being an observer at a drive-by shooting. An idea, or part of an idea, is contributed, then, for the most part, partially commented on, dismissed or just plain shot down.
As for rules: every process has rules-don't garden in a monsoon, don't build your house with wax nails, don't drive blindfolded, etc. These are humorous examples, but the point I was trying to make earlier was that the mindset of humans needs to change. Why? So that we do not put ourselves in a situation that duplicates the current one. There is no point in just bemoaning the situation that we have made for ourselves-it is necessary to discuss and determine what changes could/should be made to change the course of human events.
IMHO, it would be better (easier?) to discuss these matters before TSHTF.
There have been many well-thought out points brought out in the different forums. There are also many bits-n-pieces of ideas that are wasted as they quickly digress into pointless, anal word-by-word analysis' ... And, there are comments that fall in between.
Most of us agree that cheap oil has peaked or is now peaking, that the world's economy has almost no basis in reality any more, that arible land & the ability to grow sufficient food is rapidly diminishing, that the climate is changing (for whatever reason) & not for the better as far as living things go-in short, everything that can go 'wrong' is going wrong.
Why should it be unreasonable to ask the question 'what decisions can be made or would be appropriate to adjust humanity's mindset from the disasterous one now used to a healthy mindset?
Survival of the fittest should be more than just who can shoot the most people. There are examples of 'survival of the fittest" in the plant and animal worlds. Should we just assume that humans are so stupid and lazy that we don't need to re-examine the world we have created? Shouldn't those who are able make some effort to change our course for the better?