by AgentR » Fri 19 Sep 2008, 09:29:29
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zardoz', 'S')o, do you feel he's done a good job? Do you consider his term to be a successful presidency?
Mediocre. There have been far worse; and he gets points in my book for DOING the domestic policy agenda he campaigned on. You may not *LIKE* the things he has done; but thats a different issue altogether.
I understand that if you didn't want to fight any resource wars, or you wanted to advance some quaint lefty-green agenda, Bush and Co could be seen as a huge disaster.
So when you say successful, you always have to say, successful at doing what. Bush has been successful at getting more US forces stationed closer to resources the US needs for survival. Bush has been successful at maintaining dollar traded oil. Bush has been successful at keeping the economy from falling into a depression (so far). Bush has been successful at pushing through tons of new permitting for traditional energy resources. Bush has been successful at getting middle class Americans in on the "direct check from the government" movement. Bush has been successful at deploying the first, basic, ballistic missle interceptors. Bush has been successful at rebuilding and refocussing NASA from Disastrous Decision Makers United against Change, to Lets Lift Stuff! I could run this paragraph until peoples eyes bleed, but you get my point.
Different measures of success mean different things to different people. Bush accomplished much of what I wanted to see accomplished, though he did do it in a sloppy, uncoordinated, and inefficient manner.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.