by Sixstrings » Sun 25 Mar 2012, 07:10:08
Just read an article on this. She says basically the same thing I just did, but then goes on to posit a larger meaning to the movie. I wonder though, will the popcorn eating masses "get it?" Or is it just escapist gothic dark fantasy, message not important? I remember when I was a kid, I liked post-apocalyptic movies just because I liked them, I saw them as fantasy, a "what if" thing I never connected it with real issues.
From the article:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Since she wrote it, Americans have risen up in widespread protest of bank bailouts, foreclosures and mass unemployment. Coupled with horrific scenes of police violence against Occupy Wall Street protesters, it’s started to come into focus: America has never been hungrier for a popular entertainment that excoriates the ultra-rich.
“The Hunger Games” is,
at its core, a critique of winner-take-all capitalism — a writ-large version of the same struggle that’s given us the Occupy movement and the idea that America’s top 1% is ruling badly and unjustly, with disastrous consequences. Again and again, the books contrast Katniss’s poor but noble hometown, full of dying miners and starving children, with her country’s corrupt Capitol, a fortress city where overdressed aristocrats vomit during banquets in order to stuff themselves again.
Is it right for a small percentage of the population to utterly control access to wealth and power? Is it exploitative when we watch as members of a lower socioeconomic class scramble and fight over scraps of money and potential fame, as they do on many real reality shows and, indeed, in many real televised sports? The gladiatorial Games are a metaphor for the high-stakes games that poor people must play in America to merely survive.
And these days, they’re also not a metaphor. They’re just a mild exaggeration of a culture where one of the only ways for its least privileged citizens to escape their circumstances seems to be risking public pain and humiliation as cameras record their every move.
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/real ... 025?pgno=1On the other hand.. think about it.. privileged first worlders watching this movie, iPhone and other Apple products in their pockets, aren't they the "Capitol" and the Chinese slave laborers making all these things the "districts?" Lot of food for thought here. The Hunger Games is fantasy, but hungry workers making 24 cents per hour, fed a ration of rice without meat, all to provide us in "the Capitol" with our iStuff -- that's reality.
Comparing this to the Hunger Games world, I would imagine "the Capitol" would have its own elites and lower classes. Lower classes in the capitol would feel they are the oppressed, while ignorant of / not giving a damn about the even more oppressed out in the districts.
If we play this whole thought experiment out, you wind up with an argument for communism or socialism at the minimum but this book trilogy just isn't nuanced to that level -- ultimately Hunger Games is just dark escapist fantasy.
Nobody watching this movie will feel moved to send a few bucks to the impoverished worker who made their iPad.