by Heineken » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 08:27:53
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pedalling_faster', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'O')ne of the difficulties here is defining the object; i.e., how long do we have UNTIL WHAT? I have trouble with that myself. I guess the answer would be, Until the bad external trends have a sufficiently stinging personal impact, beyond some threshold that I won't recognize until I cross it.
i think the Bush Cheney administration is likely to extract some bizarre political gain from a major stock market crash, which in this case would be to give Israel a thumbs up on attacking Iran.
the goal being to make Iran someone we can blame our economic problems on.
"everything was OK until Iran attacked us" "and that turned a recession into a depression"
the US is already engaged in a low level series of attacks on Iran, or at least things that we would consider an act of war if somebody crossed from Mexico into the US, and did them to the US.
i don't think the stock market dropping to 7000 is that big a deal, it re-traces its steps to where it was in what, 1990 ? i guess then we would find out what a bubble free US economy looks like, with $140 barrel oil, and that will be a huge deal, though hard to visualize.
if the US started making things again, like in the 1980's, i would like that.
i swear, i think having madmen in the White House does complicate the situation !
The US/Israel strategy against Iran reminds me a bit of Hitler's against his European neighbors just before WWII. Stir up the hornet's nest, then scream like a baby when you get stung. Or better yet, insert your own hornets into the nest and have them sting you. It's a transparent strategy, but an effective one for "justifying" imperial chess moves that would probably be made anyway.
Iran is a big trigger for doom, no doubt about it. So is the whole US military involvement in the Middle East. That has to be one of the most dangerous, stupid, wasteful, and futile "missions" we've ever engaged in.