Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Derivatives and Peak Oil

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Derivatives and Peak Oil

Postby mkwin » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 15:29:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('clueless', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he total value of those 6 million mortgages is, assuming average mortgages of £150,000, is

900,000,000,000 or $900 billion. Assuming 50% of those properties are re possessed and sold for 80% of their market value, there would be a loss of $90 billion.

A significant figure but hardly the cataclysmic. Considering we lost many trillions of dollars with the dotcom crash and this wasn't the end of the world.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')onsidering we lost many trillions of dollars


We lost tmany trillions of dollars ? Where did they go ? Did they vanish ? No - It was a transfer of wealth. Money does not simply get "lost" it is transferred, in most cases from the middle class to the upper class, which is also what happened in the housing industry.

Houses were sold to younger people at huge profits due to the criminal lending practices in the banking industry which was manipulated by TPTB (mainly bush and greenspan). So now you have an entire generation of young people enslaved for the next 10-20 yrs.

And what will most likley unravel this house of cards is population demographics i.e less young people entering the work force and more old people retiring in developed countries. That means young people have less to spend and old people will be earning less and spending less and drawing more govt. entitlements, which will not be able to be paid, without devaluing the currency even more.

Or

China could allow the yaun to float and sink the US and Europe in a heartbeat......


Wealth doesn't vanish - of course it does?? Were did all the value go from the stock markets following the dotcom crash? It does simply vanish, firms go bankrumpt, share prices crash and value disappears. Have you never heard of Enron or Worldcom?. There are many examples of bubbles in history when they pop much of the wealth is lost.

An aging population is an issue in many countries but given the other issues we face it isn't a high priority.

China wouldn't 'sink the US and Europe' by floating the yaun. The US has been pushing them to remove their dollar peg for years as it keeps their exports artifcially low. If this happened inflation would pick-up but on the other hand Chinese exports would be less competitive so more products would be sourced from home markets increasing economic growth. The US argues the pegging of the yaun gives Chinese manufacturing an unfair advantage over the US manufacturing industry.

I think you have some very strong opinions which is great but I'm doubting you have any economic grounding and it's pretty complicated stuff if you haven't had the benefit of studying it.
User avatar
mkwin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Derivatives and Peak Oil

Postby shortonoil » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 15:36:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e don’t know yet but even in the worse case it won’t be as bad as the dotcom fiasco.


The dotcom bust was isolated to the tech sector. Yes, some little old ladies lost everything. This fiasco is spread to almost every institutional investor in the country; pension funds, insurance companies, banks, educational institutions ... etc. It is based on $1 trillion in bad loans, leveraged 15 times over. This is going to make the dotcom bust look like and invitation to a Quaker Picnic!!
User avatar
shortonoil
False ETP Prophet
False ETP Prophet
 
Posts: 7132
Joined: Thu 02 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: VA USA

Re: Derivatives and Peak Oil

Postby clueless » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 15:39:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ealth doesn't vanish - of course it does?? Were did all the value go from the stock markets following the dotcom crash? It does simply vanish, firms go bankrumpt, share prices crash and value disappears. Have you never heard of Enron or Worldcom?. There are many examples of bubbles in history when they pop much of the wealth is lost.


I worked at two .coms and lived through it. The directors sold their shares to all of us working schmucks and the moment they sold their shares the stock tanked and we lost all our equity while they gained it.

The only occasion where wealth is lost is in a deflationary cycle which would be suicide for any politician and will never happen again. But people still gained in the last one that happened in the 30's.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')hina wouldn't 'sink the US and Europe' by floating the yaun. The US has been pushing them to remove their dollar peg for years as it keeps their exports artifcially low. If this happened inflation would pick-up but on the other hand Chinese exports would be less competitive so more products would be sourced from home markets increasing economic growth. The US argues the pegging of the yaun gives Chinese manufacturing an unfair advantage over the US manufacturing industry.


Nobody knows what would really happen in this scenario, but it would not be good for the US. They may say they want this but is is in my opinion political. If the yuan were floated you would see foreign investment migrating more (that it allready is) to China, the dollar would tank and the yaun would soar, just like the Google IPO....

That is just my point - There is no manufacturng base in the US, do you think these things happen overnight ? What would we manufacture ? I work in the power industry and we cannot find
enough engineers for operation and maintenence much less new development. And I work for a fortune 25 company and see this firsthand.
User avatar
clueless
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Just the right place
Top

Re: Derivatives and Peak Oil

Postby mkwin » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 15:43:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonoil', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ouple of points; 1) The central bank system is regulated - less so in the US than Europe but still regulated. The banking system is highly regulated. 2) Fractional lending has been around since the creation of the central bank systems. 3) The economy and the financial markets have been driven by a prolonged business cycle upturn. This is due to historically low inflation which is due to globalisation.


1) Perhaps the central banking system is. Investment Banks and Hedge Funds aren’t. If they are they are not regulated very well, otherwise they wouldn’t be allowed to issues trillions of $ of sythethic CDO’s on bonds that they don’t even own.

2) Fractional lending started in the 13th century with English and French gold dealers. They started out as security companies that stored other peoples gold. Then they started lending other peoples gold at interest. Finally, they figured out that they could loan out almost all the gold that people had deposited, as not everyone requested their gold at the same time. Of course, sometimes they got hung when someone of importance showed up to collect their gold, and it wasn’t there. Society should have continued that tradition!

3) What has fueled a prolonged business cycle is the fact that the US, after shipping its manufacturing facilities oversees and millions of its high paying jobs, has been going into debt to the tune of $800 billion per year. This has been more of a prolonged hijacking than a prolonged business cycle.


1) The people who set-up CDO/MBS are investment banks who package them up for the original mortgage companies and sell them on to investors. They are heavily regulated - in the UK by The Financial Services and Markets Act. Hedge Funds are not regulated but they are bound by existing investment legislation. If these guys want to risk their money that’s their choice - we live in a free market that last time I checked.

2) Thanks! Haven't read much about the old pre-modern banking system but very interesting.

3) Well in many ways I agree with you, globalisation is an unprecedented event but it has had its benefits. inflation has stayed low, economic growth has been good and unemployment levels has been pretty low around the world The US and to lesser extent the UK debt levels are worrying and will mean the US will go into recession later this year or early next year. There will be lots of bad debt written off. However the banks have been making huge amounts of profit over the last business upturn so these losses shouldn't be a problem except for their shareholders. Now throw peak oil into the mix and you have a completely different scenario.
User avatar
mkwin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Derivatives and Peak Oil

Postby clueless » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 15:45:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')eal estate and construction in generally circa 10% of GDP. A significant component but not a driver of the business cycle.


You look at things on a macro level - How much is economic actiivity is tied to real estate and construction ??? When you add it all up it you will see it is much more than that.
User avatar
clueless
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Just the right place
Top

Re: Derivatives and Peak Oil

Postby mkwin » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 15:46:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonoil', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e don’t know yet but even in the worse case it won’t be as bad as the dotcom fiasco.


The dotcom bust was isolated to the tech sector. Yes, some little old ladies lost everything. This fiasco is spread to almost every institutional investor in the country; pension funds, insurance companies, banks, educational institutions ... etc. It is based on $1 trillion in bad loans, leveraged 15 times over. This is going to make the dotcom bust look like and invitation to a Quaker Picnic!!


You're mistaken - the dotcom bust hit all of those investors you mentioned.

The scale of the loss here is in the tens of billions, possibily just into the hundreds of billions if there is a big recession, not the trillions experinced in the dotcom bust.
User avatar
mkwin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Derivatives and Peak Oil

Postby mkwin » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 15:47:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('clueless', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')eal estate and construction in generally circa 10% of GDP. A significant component but not a driver of the business cycle.


You look at things on a macro level - How much is economic actiivity is tied to real estate and construction ??? When you add it all up it you will see it is much more than that.


10% - equity release from increasing house prices has driven consumption growth somewhat but that has accounted for 1-2% GDP.
User avatar
mkwin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Derivatives and Peak Oil

Postby clueless » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 15:49:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he scale of the loss here is in the tens of billions, possibily just into the hundreds of billions if there is a big recession, not the trillions experinced in the dotcom bust.


Would you please explain where all this "lost" money went ?? It was still put into circulation. It did not "go" anywhere expect into someone else's bank account.

Why can't you see this, once money is put into circulation it stays in circulation until someone takes it out of circulation.
User avatar
clueless
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Just the right place
Top

Re: Derivatives and Peak Oil

Postby shortonoil » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 15:52:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '9')00,000,000,000 or $900 billion. Assuming 50% of those properties are re possessed and sold for 80% of their market value, there would be a loss of $90 billion.


Who do you propose they sell those home to for 80%, when the US already has a backlog of 4 million unsold homes. 11 % of the homes in the country are vacant and housing looks to have gone down 8% last month. 20% of potential buyers will be washed out of the market during the next two years. The above piece is nothing but a bit of fantasy.

Plus, it appears that probably 90% of the subprime borrowers will eventually default.
User avatar
shortonoil
False ETP Prophet
False ETP Prophet
 
Posts: 7132
Joined: Thu 02 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: VA USA
Top

Re: Derivatives and Peak Oil

Postby clueless » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 15:54:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '1')0% - equity release from increasing house prices has driven consumption growth somewhat but that has accounted for 1-2% GDP.


This is where you are wrong. There are many sectors housing appreciation affect. Probably the most being conusmer confidence which accounts for 70% of our economy in the US, but there are many other things. I could not even begin to name them all because there are so many.
User avatar
clueless
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Just the right place
Top

Re: Derivatives and Peak Oil

Postby clueless » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:01:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ho do you propose they sell those home to for 80%, when the US already has a backlog of 4 million unsold homes. 11 % of the homes in the country are vacant and housing looks to have gone down 8% last month. 20% of potential buyers will be washed out of the market during the next two years. The above piece is nothing but a bit of fantasy.

Plus, it appears that probably 90% of the subprime borrowers will eventually default.


And this says nothing of the fact that speculators are now off the market, The NASDAQ was at 5000 7 yrs ago and is now half that. Combine all this with the huge debtloads allready being carried by the average person you have a real problem on your hands.

Your assumptions and conclusions sound awfully central bankersih...Maybe he is one of them.

Credit card charges increased by (was it 20%) last month ???
The wheels are coming off, slowly but still coming off nonetheless.
User avatar
clueless
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Just the right place
Top

Re: Derivatives and Peak Oil

Postby mkwin » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:04:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('clueless', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he scale of the loss here is in the tens of billions, possibily just into the hundreds of billions if there is a big recession, not the trillions experinced in the dotcom bust.


Would you please explain where all this "lost" money went ?? It was still put into circulation. It did not "go" anywhere expect into someone else's bank account.

Why can't you see this, once money is put into circulation it stays in circulation until someone takes it out of circulation.




1) Firms became insolvent - their assets were sold at deflated prices by creditors.

2) Share prices collapsed - Which was unrealized wealth. I could buy a stock that increases in value from $1 to $10 without selling it because the profit growth prospects cause the share to be valued in this way. Wealth doesn't have to be in circulation to be wealth. This massive loss of share value is the reason the FED cut rates to 1% because they feared deflation.

3) Bad debts - Many of these firms Enron/WorldCom/Global Crossing borrowed large amounts from banks as well. These loans were secured on future profit growth expectations. So many of these loans were written off by the banks – again hundreds of billions of dollars, much of it wasted.
User avatar
mkwin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Derivatives and Peak Oil

Postby shortonoil » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:14:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '9')00,000,000,000 or $900 billion. Assuming 50% of those properties are re possessed and sold for 80% of their market value, there would be a loss of $90 billion.


Who do you propose they sell those homes to for 80%, when the US already has a backlog of 4 million unsold homes. 11 % of the homes in the country are vacant and housing looks to have gone down 8% last month. 20% of potential buyers will be washed out of the market during the next two years. The above piece is nothing but a bit of fantasy.

Plus, it appears that probably 90% of the subprime borrowers will eventually default.

clueless said:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') worked at two .coms and lived through it. The directors sold their shares to all of us working schmucks and the moment they sold their shares the stock tanked and we lost all our equity while they gained it.


This is the same methodology that the big financial houses have been using for quite a while. The little guy, especially if he is a short trader gets burned every time. Look what a job that they did on Amaranth. You can bet that GS, JP Morgan and Bears Stern are planning right now, how to dump their junk before the rest of the trading community really figures out what a mess they are in. The problem is, as they have recently found out, it isn’t worth anything.
User avatar
shortonoil
False ETP Prophet
False ETP Prophet
 
Posts: 7132
Joined: Thu 02 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: VA USA
Top

Re: Derivatives and Peak Oil

Postby clueless » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:15:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '1')) Firms became insolvent - their assets were sold at deflated prices by creditors.

2) Share prices collapsed - Which was unrealized wealth. I could buy a stock that increases in value from $1 to $10 without selling it because the profit growth prospects cause the share to be valued in this way. Wealth doesn't have to be in circulation to be wealth. This massive loss of share value is the reason the FED cut rates to 1% because they feared deflation.

3) Bad debts - Many of these firms Enron/WorldCom/Global Crossing borrowed large amounts from banks as well. These loans were secured on future profit growth expectations. So many of these loans were written off by the banks – again hundreds of billions of dollars, much of it wasted.


The dollars were loaned and still put into circulation and ended up somwhere - Please answer the question and tell me where they went ? Did they vanish ? Were they burned ? Did they simply go into obolvion ? They went somewhere, and in many cases they ended up in the hands of the wealthy. The .com was not a collapese it was a wealth transfer mechanism in which trilions were taken from the middel class and transferred to the upper class.

Wealth is not "created" it is transfered through various mechanisms.
User avatar
clueless
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Just the right place
Top

Re: Derivatives and Peak Oil

Postby mkwin » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:16:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonoil', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '9')00,000,000,000 or $900 billion. Assuming 50% of those properties are re possessed and sold for 80% of their market value, there would be a loss of $90 billion.


Who do you propose they sell those home to for 80%, when the US already has a backlog of 4 million unsold homes. 11 % of the homes in the country are vacant and housing looks to have gone down 8% last month. 20% of potential buyers will be washed out of the market during the next two years. The above piece is nothing but a bit of fantasy.

Plus, it appears that probably 90% of the subprime borrowers will eventually default.


You sell them at 80% of the market value to make them far cheaper than the competition. I just picked this figure out of thin air take 70% if you like – the point remains the same.

Do you have a link to that 90% figure? I've never seen an estimate that high before.

I'm not trying to say the US housing crash won't be messy - you will be in a recession within the year. The point is some of the figures thrown around here like $100 trillion is nonsense.
User avatar
mkwin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Derivatives and Peak Oil

Postby clueless » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:20:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his is the same methodology that the big financial houses have been using for quite a while. The little guy, especially if he is a short trader gets burned every time. Look what a job that they did on Amaranth. You can bet that GS, JP Morgan and Bears Stern are planning right now, how to dump their junk before the rest of the trading community really figures out what a mess they are in. The problem is, as they have recently found out, it isn’t worth anything.


WHo was it that said "Give me control of the money printing press and I care not who makes the laws" I am sure you know, but am just as sure it will be written of as conspiricy propaganda by our banker friend here...

I would bet he is a new hire just out of school who has bought all the college propaganda and cannot face the fact he wasted 50 grand in tuition and leanred nothing.

A prime example of the "Psychology of previous investment" or where your treasure is there your heart will be also.

The current University system, I am sad to say, is where most of the propaganda is spread.
User avatar
clueless
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Just the right place
Top

Re: Derivatives and Peak Oil

Postby mkwin » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:21:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('clueless', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '1')) Firms became insolvent - their assets were sold at deflated prices by creditors.

2) Share prices collapsed - Which was unrealized wealth. I could buy a stock that increases in value from $1 to $10 without selling it because the profit growth prospects cause the share to be valued in this way. Wealth doesn't have to be in circulation to be wealth. This massive loss of share value is the reason the FED cut rates to 1% because they feared deflation.

3) Bad debts - Many of these firms Enron/WorldCom/Global Crossing borrowed large amounts from banks as well. These loans were secured on future profit growth expectations. So many of these loans were written off by the banks – again hundreds of billions of dollars, much of it wasted.


The dollars were loaned and still put into circulation and ended up somwhere - Please answer the question and tell me where they went ? Did they vanish ? Were they burned ? Did they simply go into obolvion ? They went somewhere, and in many cases they ended up in the hands of the wealthy. The .com was not a collapese it was a wealth transfer mechanism in which trilions were taken from the middel class and transferred to the upper class.

Wealth is not "created" it is transfered through various mechanisms.


Markets are not a zero-sum game. In order for asset values to fall there doesn't have to be a corresponding removal of value out of that market.
User avatar
mkwin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Derivatives and Peak Oil

Postby clueless » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:22:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he point is some of the figures thrown around here like $100 trillion is nonsense.


The reason why it is nonsense is a hundred trillion dollars will not just "dissapear", it will be transferred to another area of the economy.

You have just made my point.
User avatar
clueless
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Just the right place
Top

Re: Derivatives and Peak Oil

Postby clueless » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:27:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'c')orresponding removal of value out of that market.


Explain what you mean by a "corresponding removal of value" what is value ? Do you mean monetary worth ? You only realize monetary worth when you acutally transfer a good for money or something else.

Those .com shares were sold to high and sold low, somebody still made the money and spent it somewhere else.
User avatar
clueless
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Just the right place
Top

Re: Derivatives and Peak Oil

Postby mkwin » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:28:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('clueless', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his is the same methodology that the big financial houses have been using for quite a while. The little guy, especially if he is a short trader gets burned every time. Look what a job that they did on Amaranth. You can bet that GS, JP Morgan and Bears Stern are planning right now, how to dump their junk before the rest of the trading community really figures out what a mess they are in. The problem is, as they have recently found out, it isn’t worth anything.


WHo was it that said "Give me control of the money printing press and I care not who makes the laws" I am sure you know, but am just as sure it will be written of as conspiricy propaganda by our banker friend here...

I would bet he is a new hire just out of school who has bought all the college propaganda and cannot face the fact he wasted 50 grand in tuition and leanred nothing.

A prime example of the "Psychology of previous investment" or where your treasure is there your heart will be also.

The current University system, I am sad to say, is where most of the propaganda is spread.


Mayer Amschel Rothschild and no it don't think it is a nonsense conspiracy theory the Rothchilds were one of the most powerful families in history.

lol....We've fallen the level so common on this site. If it doesn't fit the argument it must be propaganda or a conspiracy.

And no i'm not a 'new hire'.
User avatar
mkwin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron