by vision-master » Tue 26 Aug 2008, 11:27:45
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('halcyon', 'I')nteresting discussion. Let me see if I get this straight?
Americans live beyond their means and do into spiraling debt. They enjoy the ride while this happens and happily proclaim "USA is the best thing since sliced bread" and whatnot Then they have to start paying back. Paying back sucks. So, why not just default, declare personal bankruptcy or just stop paying and see what happens?
Maybe somebody else will pay my bills and debt? Why should I pay for the debt that I created? etc.
I'm sorry if that's a mis-characterisation, but that's what it looks like to me. -snip- If USA was a smaller country with less nukes and no position in security council (etc), nobody would give a damn. Economists would argue on what kind of World Bank program USA should be put under, and that's it. However, now that it is USA, somehow the rules change. Funny that.
Example Buckwheat
Seven years later, lone accountant beats IRS. Tax analyst: ‘Tens of thousands of people could be in line for a refund’$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he accountant from Baxter, MN challenged the method the IRS has used for more than 20 years to tax shares and cash distributed by mutual life insurance firms to their policyholders when they reorganize as public companies.
The dispute arose when more than 30 mutual life insurance companies became publicly traded corporations in the late 1990s and earlier this decade, in a process known as "demutualization."
Mutual companies are owned by their policyholders, so the companies provided stock and cash to compensate them for the loss of their ownership interests when they went public.
All told, roughly 30 million policyholders received distributions, Ulrich estimates. MetLife Inc. provided over $7 billion of stock to about 11 million policyholders when it went public in 2000, while Prudential distributed $12.5 billion in stock to another 11 million.
One of Ulrich's clients, Eugene Fisher, a trustee for a Baltimore, Md.-based trust, sued the IRS in February 2004 after being denied a refund.
Judge Francis Allegra of the Court of Federal Claims in Washington sided with Fisher and called the IRS' view "illogical" in an Aug. 6 decision. He ordered the agency to refund $5,725 in taxes plus interest to the trust overseen by Fisher.