by fastbike » Thu 18 Nov 2004, 18:05:52
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PhilBiker', 'S')pend a few hours googling about Ruppert and read some text by his detractors before joining his legion of disciples. I would suggest this for any author, but particularly for Ruppert.
And come up with what. A gripe on WingTV !
As a kid I was taught to
play the ball not the man. Yet any criticism I see of Ruppert seems to centre on his rudeness. So what ! It might not be the smartest way of tackling your critics but maybe he's just frustrated by people who think that Peak Oil is an (oil company) conspiracy and that oil is created abiotically. Tell us about it.
Most of the critics then deconstruct Ruppert's words and accuse him of being a stooge of the oil companies (a la Peak Oil) or the Rockefellers (a la world population and consumption pressures).
As to the notion that if half of what he alleges is true he'd
be goneski - that's too obvious. Kill the fellow and he becomes a martyr. Instead discredit him, then he is shunned and neutralised that way. This explains the "Discredit Ruppert" campaign in full swing - especially that his book is in print. It's relatively easy to take down / bury a web site but what do you do when you've got 35,000 books in circulation. You have to work against the author.
And yes, Ruppert got well and truly sucked-in by the whole Vreeland saga. But even if you remove those chapters, there are still many questions in the book that have never been asked of (nor answered by) those in power.
The fact remains - peak oil is a happening thing. Something many of his critics flatly refuse to debate.
Let's hope the next generation have a sense of humour ... our generation will need it.