by shortonsense » Fri 19 Mar 2010, 18:39:33
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse2', ' ') I'm convinced they are trying to keep tenants in their and paying so that they can find a buyer. However, this shows how bad the commercial property market is when tenants are forgiven $300k in back rent and rent reduced just to keep the space filled.
Its called a "business decision".....and seems perfectly reasonable to me. Pretty standard deal post-bubble seems like, I'm betting its happened before, and it will happen again.
Certain places seem to be doing okay, even in areas which otherwise are considered disasters. For example, over at "that other place", they used this article as an example of how horrible things are.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/reale ... atrick.netAnd yet if the person who characterized it as "market collapse savages commercial real estate" had actually read the article, he would have discovered this:
"Yet despite the avalanche of negative indicators, some in the public and private sector are keen to point out bright spots for commercial real estate in the Phoenix area. Desirable pockets in affluent cities like Scottsdale have little vacant space available at any price, while areas close to the downtown core and along established urban corridors are weathering the storm fairly well. CityScape, a $900 million commercial development in the heart of downtown Phoenix that includes shops, restaurants and a 27-story office tower, is at least 75 percent leased months ahead of its scheduled opening this summer."
That was on Page 2....I suppose in the rush to characterize for the particular audience its too much to ask that someone actually read the entire article.