Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

"Can Collapse of Global Civ. Be Avoided?" by P&A Ehrlich

A forum to either submit your own review of a book, video or audio interview, or to post reviews by others.

Re: Ehrlich: 10% chance of avoiding total collapse

Postby onlooker » Mon 12 Oct 2015, 15:42:59

Oh no plenty of drama with just peak oil and its consequences!
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: Ehrlich: 10% chance of avoiding total collapse

Postby Tanada » Mon 12 Oct 2015, 15:54:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'A')ctually I am much less of doomer than most here. I truly believe (and can debate the issue endlessly) that peak oil will trump AGW. The chance that runaway or abrupt climate change event will occur in the near future is actually rather slim. Long before then peak-oil collapse will drive folks out of remote areas and back into cities. I know from experience here in timber country, that resource extraction even a few miles off main roads requires incredible amounts of fuel.

A single 32' douglas fir log weights more than your car (6,000 lb.) and is worth quite a bit less, perhaps $600. Many gallons of diesel are required to get such a trivial bit of income from deep within remaining forests all the way to a saw mill and market. No different in the Amazon anymore.

Resource extraction today, now, in this day and age of poor-quality material is barely worth it. When economies and construction industry collapse then it will be worth no ones time and effort to get into the forests for anything. Not timber, not copper, not cattle, not bush meat. Not even petroleum. There will not be the fuel and road-maintenance to get there. People who have never lived in the country have no idea how energy intensive it is. Timber road maintenance is more expensive than city road maintenance. Back-to-landers burn petroleum like hippies burn buds lol Folks will run back to the city for their daily bowl of gruel. And warm cot. Thanks to the Government Ration Plan.


I believe you have created a false dichotomy Pete. When the fuel gets expensive the price of everything hauled with fuel has to go up step by step as much as the market can bare. Most Douglas Fir cut and hauled today is wasted on trivial things like tearing down perfectly sound existing housing with all the lumber shipped off to the landfill or the incinerator just to build a bigger McMansion on the same lot. I see it developing in multiple ways, but up until the modern super waste era people did not frequently tear down sound buildings just to replace them with something more extravagant. Up until 1900 or so if you tore down a house you literally tore it apart piece by piece to salvage as much of the frame as you could. Now we go in with a backhoe or power shovel and smash it into pieces small enough to fit in a roll off dumpster, then ship it off to a landfill where we bury it. Sometime the pipes and wiring are stripped out for the copper value, sometimes not, and it is very rare today for carved woodwork or other built in portions to be salvaged even if the house is old enough to have such things.

Take away the cheap fuel running those heavy machines and suddenly deconstruction becomes a much more rewarding way to deal with an old house. Plasterboard isn't worth a whole lot, but the lumber that is in that frame can be reused in your new house project at the McMansion factory for 'store credit' on your new pre framed wall sections or roof rafters. On the other hand if you are going to have a wood stove/fire place and they are from the era before pressure treated arsenic filled lumbar you could always chop them into 24" sections and use them for cozy firewood already nice and dry and seasoned for your warmth.

The other thing to keep in mind is, if the exurbs and suburbs actually do fold back into the urban centers like so many people seem to think will happen, there will develop quite and industry in suburb deconstruction. All those McMansions too far from a viable city or town will become economically valueless except as a source of reclaimed materials. By the same token while large buildings of apartment blocks are more efficient to heat and cool than individual homes there will still be demand for fuel to do one or both depending on the local climate. If you look at a city like Detroit, Michigan, Toledo, Ohio or Gary, Indiana many ir even most of the apartment structures that once housed the city population have been abandoned and torn down to vacant lots over the last 50 years. All of that real-estate will have to be reconstructed to house those former suburbanites moving back into the urban centers. Hopefully the new construction will be greatly more efficient in energy demand than the old stuff that has long since gone, but either way if the Urban believers are right there will be the biggest apartment building boom seen since the 1920's.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: Ehrlich: 10% chance of avoiding total collapse

Postby Tanada » Mon 12 Oct 2015, 16:20:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'I') used to talk about deconstruction also. I even invented (in my mind) a entire product-line of DeWalt Deconstruction Tools. All branded and colorful yellow. But Tanada, you are talking about Powerdown and a World Made By Hand. I don't see that happening anymore, just chaos . . . but a nice kind of chaos that will stop AGW dead in its tracks. Along with 5-6 billion humans lol


I am sort of convinced the only way to stop AGW is with that kind of chaos, and I don't think that would actually stop it because so long as there are people on the planet we will be burning stuff to stay warm, or cook, or any number of other reasons.

It doesn't actually take all that high of technology to extract fossil fuels, a pick and shovel and persistence will suffice for much of the coal we now extract with open pit mining and heavy machinery. They did it in 1850 I don't see why they can't still do it in 2050 or 2150 until they get all the accessible coal. The rate of use will go way down without the machines, but it won't stop unless the population falls so far the remainder are back to be hunter gatherers burning biofuels exclusively in a sustainable rate.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: Ehrlich: 10% chance of avoiding total collapse

Postby onlooker » Mon 12 Oct 2015, 17:08:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'B')ut Tanada, that 1850's coal was in clean-seams near the surface where folks actually lived. The stuff we mine now is under the permafrost or on mountain tops, ie in the very places where you need a truck to get to. Its the same with precious and industrial metals. And timber. The good stuff is gone and the rest is deep, remote, dispersed and very expensive to extract. And nowhere near population and transport centers. Same with precious petroleum

This all makes sense as we went first for the low hanging fruit, meaning the less difficult to access physically and economically so as to profit the most and in this way were able to build the vast infrastructure which ironically needs always new resources to function and maintain.
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA
Top

Re: Ehrlich: 10% chance of avoiding total collapse

Postby dohboi » Mon 12 Oct 2015, 17:29:48

The very rich and the military (or the very rich who own their own military units!) will pretty much always be able to afford or obtain ff and materials to go about their grisly business.

Total chaos means war pretty much everywhere, and modern war means burning lots of fossil fuels.

That's why I think most collapse scenarios will not result in much reduction in net ff burning and could actually result in an increase. What's not financially feasible for shell may be militarily feasible for Russia, or China, or the US, or other interested parties.
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Ehrlich: 10% chance of avoiding total collapse

Postby onlooker » Mon 12 Oct 2015, 17:36:09

Okay guys your really tweaking my curiosity. So how really feasible is it to powerdown. You guys certainly know about the Hirsh report and how we needed some time before peak to transition to a less fossil fuel dependent society. Kunstler also talks about the death of the suburbs and the auto. Even at this late juncture with the deconstruction or salvage/scavenging Tanada talks about, with your reference to less energy needed Pete, with all the wasteful economic activity going on in this country could we not given the political will and everyone on board with a Manhattan type project focus not fairly quickly transition at least to some degree to a much less fossil fuel dependent country here in the US? Sorry I know this probably has been discussed at length but we do need to update this question do we not.
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: Ehrlich: 10% chance of avoiding total collapse

Postby Lore » Mon 12 Oct 2015, 18:16:41

Kunstler's, Little House on the Prairie, is not about to happen. It's going to look at first more like, Children of Men, before it turns into, The Road.

Total and complete collapse is a process that will still take a few centuries at the least, baring any black swans. It won't be a one two punch of just a warming climate and an energy shortage, but a combination of all the threats that an over crowded under resourced planet can muster.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: Ehrlich: 10% chance of avoiding total collapse

Postby Lore » Mon 12 Oct 2015, 18:45:25

Your kidding pstarr... I can just run through the woods over to my neighbor and munch on 100 acres of field corn! I've seen it...It's there!
Last edited by Lore on Mon 12 Oct 2015, 19:02:02, edited 1 time in total.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: Ehrlich: 10% chance of avoiding total collapse

Postby Tanada » Mon 12 Oct 2015, 18:58:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'B')ut Tanada, that 1850's coal was in clean-seams near the surface where folks actually lived. The stuff we mine now is under the permafrost or on mountain tops, ie in the very places where you need a truck to get to. Its the same with precious and industrial metals. And timber. The good stuff is gone and the rest is deep, remote, dispersed and very expensive to extract. And nowhere near population and transport centers. Same with precious petroleum

It is neither as simple nor as dire as you make it out to be. The coal mined first in the good ole USA was found as surface showing eruptions, but it did not take more than a few months for all those early mines to move under ground. The whole first point of use for steam engines was to pump water out of mines as they got deeper than the water table and started filling up from water seeping in everywhere. The modern open pit mines in Wyoming in the Powder River Basin cover an enormous area of the state and start out very shallow. Just because we now dig down hundreds of feet with cheap electric draglines doesn't mean there are no resources that can be extracted with low technology. All the good stuff isn't gone, and most of the coal is still there as well because when a company like Peabody gets the rights to a given location they keep going down in that location until they have extracted everything they can economically recover before they move to the location next door. None of the big mining companies strips off just the first layer and moves on, that is why in Appalachia they are doing whole mountain removals. They strip a layer of overburden, mine out the layer of coal and sell it, then strip the next layer off and so on until they either get through the bottom layer of coal or the extraction cost exceeds the sale price. All those thousands of acres that have not been mined yet are the same layer cake with easily accessed stuff not very deep below the surface.

You also do not need a truck to mine off a mountain top or into the permafrost, you need a willingness to do a lot of work. Your ancestors 100 years ago did that kind of work for really low pay in horrible working conditions, your descendants or neighbors descendants will do the same 100 years from now. I already stated the extraction rate will be much slower, but much slower just means it will last a lot longer. The thing is no matter how long it takes every gram of fossil carbon extracted and burned will be added to the atmospheric burden of additional CO2, and that burden lasts on average well over a thousand years once added in. The old fantasy that released CO2 was returned to the soil in a few decades has long since been disproved.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Ehrlich: 10% chance of avoiding total collapse

Postby onlooker » Mon 12 Oct 2015, 18:59:00

Good analysis P, the New World certainly seems to be better off on a resources per capita basis then any other parts of the world except maybe for Russia.
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: Ehrlich: 10% chance of avoiding total collapse

Postby Subjectivist » Mon 12 Oct 2015, 19:21:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', 'O')kay guys your really tweaking my curiosity. So how really feasible is it to powerdown. You guys certainly know about the Hirsh report and how we needed some time before peak to transition to a less fossil fuel dependent society. Kunstler also talks about the death of the suburbs and the auto. Even at this late juncture with the deconstruction or salvage/scavenging Tanada talks about, with your reference to less energy needed Pete, with all the wasteful economic activity going on in this country could we not given the political will and everyone on board with a Manhattan type project focus not fairly quickly transition at least to some degree to a much less fossil fuel dependent country here in the US? Sorry I know this probably has been discussed at length but we do need to update this question do we not.


Powerdown is easy as pie, it will happen whether you want it too or not. Now if you expect a 2015 or even a 1950 level of technology you are just fooling yourself, life in the 300 to 500 years after oil peaks will mean lower and lower energy use until we get down to a sustainable population using a sustainable quantity of energy.

I don't know what transition means to you, but to me it means the vast majority of the population will be self sufficient farmers, just like they were in 1750, and 750 and 350.
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Subjectivist
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4705
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio
Top

Re: Ehrlich: 10% chance of avoiding total collapse

Postby Lore » Mon 12 Oct 2015, 19:39:23

You have to stop and think. Reduced population also means the economy and benefits of scale will disappear. Not only less resources globally to be mined, but intern non existent innovation. Will iPhone 9s be nothing more than a useless future hockey puck? We will morph from technologically moving forward into more complex discoveries for our use into scavengers trying to repair the magic of the old world.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

PreviousNext

Return to Book/Media Reviews

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron