Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

4% of GDP is $80 oil = Recession

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: 4% of GDP is $80 oil = Recession

Unread postby Cloud9 » Sat 06 Feb 2010, 19:26:17

Sitting here on the side lines, it seems to me that when we hit $147 a barrel and $4 at the pump, discretionary income shifted direction and went into savings and into filling our gas tanks. The never ending optimists were hit square in the face by pessimism and the flow of money that was fueling speculation slowed. Ponzie schemes float on exponential influxes of cash. Once the cash flow slowed, the bezzel in the embezzlement showed and the house of cards came crashing down.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: 4% of GDP is $80 oil = Recession

Unread postby bratticus » Sat 06 Feb 2010, 19:35:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('diemos', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bratticus', '
')
Do you have any explanation of why this was done?


Because the financial players had found a way to collect a fee up front for making a bad loan and then passing any potential future losses onto some chump. In the end, that chump became the US taxpayer.

I think there's really two separate but concurrent processes involved. One is the US Peak Oil descent from 1971 on and the other is the wackiness that results from the acts of desperation caused by thirty years or more of that descent.
User avatar
bratticus
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 2368
Joined: Thu 12 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Bratislava

Re: 4% of GDP is $80 oil = Recession

Unread postby mos6507 » Sat 06 Feb 2010, 19:47:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bratticus', '
')So why did it take until the 21st century to try it?


There have been housing bubbles before. What there hasn't been before are those "exotic" financial products, the CDOs, floating around the globalized financial markets. This was a perfect storm of greed and stupidity at multiple levels simultaneously where each participant in the clusterf*ck was not aware of the big picture. All documented perfectly in the Dateline piece.

There definitely is a house-that-jack-built connection between this and oil, but it's linked to the US oil peak in 1970, not the 2008 superspike.
mos6507
 

Re: 4% of GDP is $80 oil = Recession

Unread postby mos6507 » Sat 06 Feb 2010, 19:53:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'S')itting here on the side lines, it seems to me that when we hit $147 a barrel and $4 at the pump, discretionary income shifted direction and went into savings and into filling our gas tanks. The never ending optimists were hit square in the face by pessimism and the flow of money that was fueling speculation slowed. Ponzie schemes float on exponential influxes of cash. Once the cash flow slowed, the bezzel in the embezzlement showed and the house of cards came crashing down.


We only had $147 oil for what, a few days, before everything collapsed? Your timing is off.

The housing crash started in 2007 or even late 2006 (it was not classified as a crash at first). The timeline of the ARM resets (the graph I keep posting) is the main determining factor on when the bubble popped, not oil prices. Housing prices had peaked and there was no way those homeowners were going to just keep making payments on their houses after the reset. They couldn't afford it even if their commute was free, and even if they could, they most assuredly wanted out anyway, which created a glut of home inventory, hence depressing prices.

You could have had all the free-flowing credit in the world, but the buyers had already dried up in the housing market.

Credit locked up because the bankers finally figured out they had a mountain of homeowners on their books who had fraudulent AAA ratings. It was a quarantine. They had to stop all incoming loans in order to assess the damage on their books and to stop any incoming bad loans by auditing the credit agencies.
Last edited by mos6507 on Sat 06 Feb 2010, 19:56:32, edited 1 time in total.
mos6507
 

Re: 4% of GDP is $80 oil = Recession

Unread postby bratticus » Sat 06 Feb 2010, 19:54:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'T')here definitely is a house-that-jack-built connection between this and oil, but it's linked to the US oil peak in 1970, not the 2008 superspike.


But wasn't the super-spike just an inevitable consequence of world peak oil?

US peak oil -> house-that-jack-built -> add-on world peak oil -> boom.
User avatar
bratticus
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 2368
Joined: Thu 12 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Bratislava
Top

Re: 4% of GDP is $80 oil = Recession

Unread postby bratticus » Sat 06 Feb 2010, 19:57:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'W')e only had $147 oil for what, a few days, before everything collapsed?


Going back to the topic of this thread if $80/bbl is 4% of US GDP (demonstrated to precede five prior recessions) $147/bbl is what 7% of US GDP?
User avatar
bratticus
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 2368
Joined: Thu 12 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Bratislava
Top

Re: 4% of GDP is $80 oil = Recession

Unread postby bratticus » Sat 06 Feb 2010, 19:59:01

Plus we hit the 4% of US GDP around Sep 2007.
User avatar
bratticus
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 2368
Joined: Thu 12 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Bratislava

Re: 4% of GDP is $80 oil = Recession

Unread postby Tanada » Sat 06 Feb 2010, 20:03:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bratticus', 'P')lus we hit the 4% of US GDP around Sep 2007.



I remember reading before the November 2008 elections that the economic situation should have been classified as a recession as far back as December 2007. Perhaps your data is proof of concept?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: 4% of GDP is $80 oil = Recession

Unread postby mos6507 » Sat 06 Feb 2010, 20:06:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bratticus', '
')But wasn't the super-spike just an inevitable consequence of world peak oil?


Not $147/oil. Maybe $100-120 tops. Speculation made the superspike look worse than it was.

If the economy hadn't tanked, and speculation had been controlled, we'd probably be at $150 or above by now. Supply and demand didn't justify such an abrupt spike.

Of course, we live in the real world and speculation is a part of the game, so we're stuck with these pendulum swings, but as you can see, they can move both up AND down.

I think it's important to let 2008 go, since we no longer have either $147/bbl oil OR $30/bbl oil. Oil has crept back up to around $80 which is (as the topic says) close to the edge of what it takes to put downward pressure on the economy.

I've never disputed that high oil prices damage the economy, but I think the threshold of pain is higher than most peakers would admit. Again, if you go back in the archives you'll see panic over oil crossing $50-60 thresholds. It's really more between $80-100, and the TEOTAWKI point is much much higher than that.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: 4% of GDP is $80 oil = Recession

Unread postby mos6507 » Sat 06 Feb 2010, 20:06:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bratticus', 'P')lus we hit the 4% of US GDP around Sep 2007.


And as I said, the housing crash was already well under way in 2007.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: 4% of GDP is $80 oil = Recession

Unread postby bratticus » Sat 06 Feb 2010, 20:08:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bratticus', 'P')lus we hit the 4% of US GDP around Sep 2007.



I remember reading before the November 2008 elections that the economic situation should have been classified as a recession as far back as December 2007. Perhaps your data is proof of concept?


So that would make six recessions preceded by the US spending (at least) 4% of US GDP on oil.

So if this is consistent it can be used to make predictions. What does the summer of 2010 hold? That will be when this effect might be tested again.
User avatar
bratticus
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 2368
Joined: Thu 12 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Bratislava
Top

Re: 4% of GDP is $80 oil = Recession

Unread postby dorlomin » Sat 06 Feb 2010, 20:15:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'E')very major postwar US recession was preceded (not just correlated with, but preceded by) by oil price jumps.
You have never had to submit a scientific paper for peer review. Its kind of obvious. Its the way your mind works. You are too fixated with monocasual explanations and put far too little effort into exploring alternative explanations if only to dismiss them.

But that aside for a moment, my oil price history is rustier than my recession history, the US entered ressecions in 1945, 49 and 53. What were the oil price spikes that preceeded these?

So you think it is a law of economics that a spike in oil prices must lead to a recession but no other cause should be entertained. Does this not leave you vaulnrable to a situation where a large amount of excess liquidity is looking for a means of investing itself profitably and simply chasing comodities for a short time as they are profitable, where excess liquidity is causing a recession but one of the symptoms of the excess liquidity is a spike of comodity prices as they seek somewhere to generate a profit? Mistaking cause and effect?
User avatar
dorlomin
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: 4% of GDP is $80 oil = Recession

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 06 Feb 2010, 20:18:36

Why MUST everything have just ONE cause? 8O

Can't there be a combination of circumstances which lead to a nasty result? :?:
Ludi
 

Re: 4% of GDP is $80 oil = Recession

Unread postby dorlomin » Sat 06 Feb 2010, 20:21:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '
')you can prattle on about the US housing crisis in Cleveland, but you have yet to explain what caused the German and Japanese recessions that predated it.

So you dont think that the loss of export markets was a factor. Interesting.
User avatar
dorlomin
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: 4% of GDP is $80 oil = Recession

Unread postby bratticus » Sat 06 Feb 2010, 20:23:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'y')ou can prattle on about the US housing crisis in Cleveland, but you have yet to explain what caused the German and Japanese recessions that predated it.


Can you post your dates for

1. start of US housing crisis
2. start of German recession
3. start of Japanese recession

thanks
User avatar
bratticus
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 2368
Joined: Thu 12 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Bratislava
Top

Re: 4% of GDP is $80 oil = Recession

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Sat 06 Feb 2010, 20:27:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'M')os, how do you explain Germany and Japan's economic recessions? Do you believe that the US housing mortgage crisis is responsible for impending financial collapse of Greece, Spain, Portugal, etc? Have have read Hamilton, Rubin, Therramus., or Steven Kopits? Do you have data to refute them? By the way, cute picture. Very retro, Like your thinking :lol:

From what I hear on Fox News, gay Barney Frank forced the banks to make loans to shifty Negroes, and that......crashed Portugal???
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: 4% of GDP is $80 oil = Recession

Unread postby dorlomin » Sat 06 Feb 2010, 20:35:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dorlomin', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'E')very major postwar US recession was preceded (not just correlated with, but preceded by) by oil price jumps.
You have never had to submit a scientific paper for peer review. Its kind of obvious. Its the way your mind works. You are too fixated with monocasual explanations and put far too little effort into exploring alternative explanations if only to dismiss them.
appeal to authority. What papers have you submitted on resource economics?
I suggest you familiarize yourself with the logical fallacies before invoking them, that was not anappeal to authority. It was an observation.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dorlomin', 'B')ut that aside for a moment, my oil price history is rustier than my recession history, the US entered recession in 1945, 49 and 53. What were the oil price spikes that preceded these?
Notice I said post-war. The others I assume had to do with world-war situation.Interesting. You seem to have a different definition for the word "postwar" to everyone else. Care to enlighten us where your definition finds wide currency?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dorlomin', 'S')o you think it is a law of economics that a spike in oil prices must lead to a recession but no other cause should be entertained. Does this not leave you vaulnrable to a situation where a large amount of excess liquidity is looking for a means of investing itself profitably and simply chasing commodities for a short time as they are profitable, where excess liquidity is causing a recession but one of the symptoms of the excess liquidity is a spike of comodity prices as they seek somewhere to generate a profit? Mistaking cause and effect?I never called this a law, just referring to four economic articles I read that made a lot of sense. I asked Mos to refute them and he got all arrogant, haughty, told me this issue was settled, and then posted his snotty picture in our faces.You did not call it a law, you treated it as one. One can suggest you used it de facto and not de jure. But I think your 'answer' is as revealing as a real answer.
User avatar
dorlomin
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: 4% of GDP is $80 oil = Recession

Unread postby dorlomin » Sat 06 Feb 2010, 21:01:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'W')hy MUST everything have just ONE cause? 8O

Can't there be a combination of circumstances which lead to a nasty result? :?:

Simon and Newell were amoung the giants of cognative theory and the early AI theory. Their work produced ideas that we still use today and the idea that humans cannot understand complex systems, instead we form abstratctions of them, these abstractions can also be called models. We take the vast complexity of the world around us and simplify it into behavious and infromation we can remember. The problem with this is that we tend to strip out so much we probibly produce over simplified models of the world around us. Simon won a Nobel prize in economics for his contributions to decision making theory. But once we understand that the world around us is only a grossly simplified model of reality then we can understand our own personal limits and the limits of others. In this respect reducing economics to simple and even simplistic explanations is how most people who do not have the time or the 'processing' capacity to generate more complex models explains why people tend to find 'a thing' or one explantion and stick with it.

Were smallpox girl around I may have been able to elicit a conversation on human cognition based on this... actualy it is probibly worth a thread of its own in the psychology forum.
User avatar
dorlomin
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron