Page added on August 7, 2015
Anyone looking for the biggest immediate impact from Iran’s nuclear deal may want to turn away from the Middle East and toward the Indian subcontinent.
With U.S. sanctions easing, India is racing to build a port in Iran that will get around the fact that its land access to energy-rich former Soviet republics in Central Asia has been blocked by China and its ally Pakistan.
“We’re seeing the latest manifestation of the Great Game in Central Asia, and India is the new player,” said Michael Kugelman, a South Asia expert at the Washington-based Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. “It’s had its eyes on Central Asia for a long time.”
While the world focuses on what Iran’s opening means for Israel and Arab nations, the ramifications are also critical for Asia. Closer Iran-India ties would allow New Delhi’s leaders to secure cheaper energy imports to bolster economic growth and reduce the influence of both China and Pakistan in the region.
The six nations that make up Central Asia hold at least 11 percent of the world’s proven natural gas reserves, as well as substantial deposits of oil and coal, according to data compiled by BP Plc. Afghanistan says its mineral wealth is valued at $1 trillion to $3 trillion.
“Iran can offer us an alternative route to Central Asia,” Indian Foreign Secretary S. Jaishankar said in Singapore on July 20. “The resolution of the nuclear dispute and lifting of sanctions will allow our agenda of energy and connectivity cooperation to unfold seriously.”
India can be the first country to benefit from the deal in Asia, an Iranian diplomat told reporters in New Delhi this week. Iran was seeking billions of dollars in investment from India for ports, railways and airports, the diplomat said, asking not to be identified due to government rules.
Even before the deal to end sanctions was clinched, India reached an agreement to upgrade the Iranian port of Chabahar on the Arabian Sea. Two Indian state-run companies — Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust and Kandla Port Trust — have plans to invest $85 million to upgrade two berths.

On a five-nation Central Asian tour last month, Prime Minister Narendra Modi backed an ambitious transit route through Iran that would effectively connect Europe to India by a series of sea, rail and road links. Currently, cargo from India has to go by air or take a detour through the Suez Canal.
In a dry run on the alternative routes last August, the results showed that transit time from India’s financial capital of Mumbai could be more than halved to as short as 16 days and would slash costs by 70 percent.
Other plans are just as bold: A 900-kilometer (560 mile) railway would link the Iranian port to a part of Afghanistan where a group led by Steel Authority of India Ltd. holds rights to an $11 billion iron ore mine. Modi has proposed re-routing a Turkmenistan-India project through Iran, and his oil minister is reviewing a proposal for an undersea pipeline from India to Chabahar port.
“India isn’t energy insecure — it’s surrounded by oil and gas,” said Subodh Kumar Jain, director of South Asia Gas Enterprise Pvt., the company behind the proposed $4.5 billion undersea pipeline. “The challenge is geopolitical, not technical or financial.”
China is the biggest economic player in Central Asia. It’s the top commercial partner for every nation except Afghanistan, with its $48 billion in trade to the region dwarfing that of India, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Turkmenistan pipes almost 80 percent of its gas to China.
China has welcomed the nuclear deal, noting in a statement that Iran once played a pivotal role in the ancient Silk Road trade route linking Europe and the Far East.
Pakistan is also important. The only Muslim-majority country with a nuclear bomb has refused to allow Indian trucks to pass through to Central Asia, and plans to build overland gas pipelines from Iran and Turkmenistan had long stalled.
“Pakistan has essentially had a stranglehold over India’s policy in the region,” said Harsh V. Pant, a professor of international relations at King’s College London. “India wanted to break that. Now, that constraint has been removed.”
Even so, Pakistan doesn’t see much of a threat, according to Commerce Minister Khurram Dastgir Khan. China is investing $45 billion in an economic corridor through Pakistan stretching from China’s western border to the Arabian Sea. Pakistan is also seeking a free-trade agreement with Iran.
“The scale of Chinese investment in Pakistan and in the corridor really dwarfs anything Indian is attempting in Iran,” Khan said in an interview in Islamabad on Wednesday.
Iran and India’s historical links date back to antiquity, when Indus Valley merchants plied across routes to Mesopotamia. Persian artists sculpted the Mughal architecture of India’s north, influencing structures such as the Taj Mahal.
More recently, India was one of Iran’s top oil buyers before international sanctions were tightened several years ago.
“As always, India will be playing catch up,” Kugelman said. “It sees itself in a race with China, and it simply doesn’t want to fall that far behind.”
11 Comments on "With Iran’s Help, India Eludes China in Race for Gas Riches"
Plantagenet on Fri, 7th Aug 2015 7:17 pm
1. Persian artists didn’t sculpt the Taj Mahal. Indian artists did.
2. Its unlikely that Iran and India will ever be close allies, as Iran is Muslim and India is Hindu. However, India will happy to buy much of the NG Iran can produce.
Nony on Fri, 7th Aug 2015 9:09 pm
I hope they do pipe it. Would be good for both Iran and India. And Pakistan. A win/win/win. And probably going through Paki makes more sense than underwater. And maybe it decreases some of the tensions.
Apneaman on Fri, 7th Aug 2015 9:31 pm
Wrong again planty. Many of the artisans, especially stone workers, were Indian, but artisans from all over central Asia including Iran (Persia) were commissioned to work on it. At least 20,000.
Apneaman on Fri, 7th Aug 2015 9:37 pm
Pentagon prepares for century of climate emergencies and oil wars
“Two research documents published in recent months by the US Army reveal the military establishment’s latest thinking in startlingly frank terms. The research not only lends credence to environmental warnings about how climate change will fuel political instability, but also vindicates concerns about how looming resource shortages could destabilise the global economy.
Scarcity verdict
In June the US Army published its report to the Department of Defence (DoD), outlining a new energy security strategy. Future US Army operations, it says, will be shaped by “increased urbanisation, rising populations, young adult unemployment, and a growing middle class that drive resource competition”.
The report also flags up “climate change, rapid technology proliferation and shifts in centres of economic activity” as major forces of change:
“Global resource constraints will also undermine the integrity of the Army’s supply chain… We can no longer assume unimpeded access to the energy, water, land, and other resources required to train, sustain, and deploy a globally responsive Army.”
The report therefore sets out a blueprint for how the US Army intends to sustain operational effectiveness, based on minimising its resource footprint, maximising efficiency, as well as securing resources critical to the military’s global supply chains.
http://www.middleeasteye.net/columns/pentagon-prepares-century-climate-emergencies-and-oil-wars-2021134422
ENERGY SECURITY
& SUSTAINABILITY
(ES2) STRATEGY
http://usarmy.vo.llnwd.net/e2/c/downloads/394128.pdf
Apneaman on Fri, 7th Aug 2015 9:40 pm
Wow only 377 pages – better call a staffer to create a brief.
New Realities:
Energy Security in the 2010s
and
Implications for the U.S. Military
http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/PUB1242.pdf
Makati1 on Fri, 7th Aug 2015 10:15 pm
Bloomberg has an interesting spin on this story. But then…
SugarSeam on Fri, 7th Aug 2015 11:09 pm
Nony, you might wanna revisit that “international rig count still falling” thread from earlier 8/7… Did someone hack your account, or did you mean to type that last post?
Nony on Sat, 8th Aug 2015 2:09 am
I think you can spoof other people’s names. Not me.
Makati1 on Sat, 8th Aug 2015 3:23 am
Ap, the US military will not exist after the collapse, or will be severely handicapped financially and economically, UNLESS they start a hot WW3 by invading a real country for it’s resources, like Russia. Then it is really game over.
Newfie on Sat, 8th Aug 2015 6:53 am
The more fossil fuels we burn, the hotter it gets. 2014 was the hottest year on record. 2015 will beat that record. A global average 0.1 degree C rise in one year. We’re on the Highway to Hell.
Makati1 on Sun, 9th Aug 2015 4:05 am
BTW: The Nuclear Clock is moving closer to midnight with every passing day. This is for all of you deniers that a hot WW3 is NOT going to happen.
“…Speaking on the eve of the 70th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, Obama said that a scuttling of the nuclear deal with Iran that was announced last month would mean war with Iran—a country nearly four times as large and with almost triple the population of Iraq. He further suggested, harking back to World War II and the Cold War, that a war with Iran could open the door to a Third World War.
If the US military attacks Iran as European capitalism attempts to penetrate its market, the end result could well be the death of the NATO alliance and the eruption of military tensions between Europe and America.
Obama also called attention to the implications of any attempt to force China to return to the sanctions regime. “We’d have to cut off countries like China from the American financial system,” he said. “And since they happen to be major purchasers of our debt, such actions could trigger severe disruptions in our own economy, and, by the way, raise questions internationally about the dollar’s role as the world’s reserve currency.”
Implicit in such an outcome is a military confrontation with China. It would also plunge the US and world economy into a full-scale Depression, Obama suggested…”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-on-iran-the-specter-of-world-war-iii/5467914
Duck & Cover!