Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on May 11, 2014

Bookmark and Share

What the frack!

What the frack! thumbnail

In his new book Groundswell: The Case for Fracking, Sun News Network’s Ezra Levant explores the promise of natural gas that fracking has made possible and the controversy that is preventing the exploitation of this resource around the world and here in Canada. In this excerpt, Levant looks at the situation in New Brunswick where the potential benefits of fracking are meeting with protest…

With fracking, New Brunswick could be an economic force.

For more than a century, New Brunswick has been what they call in Canada a “have not” province. Less politely put, it’s a province dependent on constitutionally mandated “equalization” payments from more financially secure provinces just to keep up with the national Canadian standard of living.

Even less politely put, New Brunswick is poor. It’s the third-poorest province in Canada. Its per-capita GDP is 18% lower than the Canadian average. But compared with an energy-producing province, like Alberta or Saskatchewan, its GDP per person is more than 40% lower.

New Brunswick governments have tried almost everything to goose economic growth in their province. In the 70s, taxpayers shovelled subsidies into the Bricklin Motors company, with visions of starting a Canadian-made car company. The Bricklin SV-1, designed by the same guy who helped create TV’s Batmobile and backed by Malcolm Bricklin, who founded Subaru’s American operation, was sleek, with gull-wing doors, but it was a huge money-loser.

Bricklin spent $16,000 to make each SV-1 and then sold them to dealers for $5,000. Fewer than 3,000 cars were made before Bricklin went out of business, taking millions in taxpayer loans with it.

In the 90s, the provincial government had a grand plan to use subsidies to lure call-centre operations – for banks, tech companies, travel agencies, etc. – to New Brunswick. The province would be the call-centre centre of North America. That must have sounded like a plausible plan – until India decided to turn itself into the call-centre centre of the world.

New Brunswickers might need the work – the province’s 10.5% unemployment rate in the first quarter of 2013 was double that of oil-rich Alberta’s- but with a legislated minimum wage of $10 an hour, they weren’t going to stand much of a chance competing with New Delhi.

The next big idea to hit New Brunswick was natural gas. Not just drilling for gas: with 10 million cubic feet of gas produced each day, N.B. wasn’t much of a producer. Nearby Nova Scotia was producing 10 times that, never mind a more energy-rich province like British Columbia, which produces 3.5 billion cubic feet a day. New Brunswick was going to import gas, from abroad. Liquefied natural gas (LNG).

Canaport, a facility designed to accept liquefied natural gas from Qatar and other gas-producing nations and re-gasify it, started construction in the mid-2000s. It accepted its first shipment in 2009. When Canaport was about to open, it must have been a very hopeful time for the province.

Co-owned by Spanish-based Repsol and locally based refining firm Irving Oil, Canaport was the first LNG facility to be built on the North American east coast in 30 years. By the time it was operational, a lot of that hope must have been dissipating. The timing couldn’t have been worse.

In July 2008, the U.S. wellhead price for natural gas had hit a record high – $10.79 per thousand cubic feet. By June 2009, just 11 months later, when that tanker with three billion cubic feet of LNG pulled in from Trinidad and Tobago, prices had collapsed by more than two-thirds, to $3.38 per thousand cubic feet. And they would never again climb anywhere near to where they had been.

Canaport today is running well below capacity – using just 30% of its capacity. By early 2013, with gas still trading at around US$4, Repsol had decided to bail on the natural gas business and on Canaport. Its debt rating was in danger of being downgraded to junk status. But it was Canaport – and a 25-year commitment to ship gas into Canada – that blocked the deal. Nobody wanted to be saddled with an LNG-import facility on the east coast, when northeastern states like New York were suddenly awash with a glut of shale gas. Canaport wasn’t alone: all LNG import operations in New England were running idle, or at least close to it.

New Brunswick, it seems, is stuck with yet one more failure in its attempt to become an economic force.

But New Brunswick may finally have something that the world would dearly value – not uneconomical sports cars, overpriced call centres, or foreign liquefied natural gas imports. It has shale – the thickest shale gas reservoir in North America is located in New Brunswick.

Nobody knows yet how much gas is trapped in that thick reservoir; the exploration is just beginning. But Frank McKenna, the province’s former premier and a former Canadian ambassador to the United States, has estimated that developing New Brunswick’s shale-gas industry could generate more than $7 billion in royalties and tax revenues for the government. For a province with an annual budget just over $7 billion, that’s an incredible amount of money. Imagine if California had suddenly stumbled on a new industry worth $100 billion – the total of its annual state budget.

That’s why the New Brunswick government is taking shale gas very seriously. All that potential for shale gas combined with an Atlantic seaport – with the potential for exporting LNG to Asia or Europe, replacing the now-uneconomic import plan – could feasibly turn New Brunswick into a vibrant energy-export hub someday.

In May 2013, the provincial government released a “blueprint” for energy exploration in the province. The premier, David Alward, called it a “key part of our government’s plan to rebuild New Brunswick’s economy and create jobs here at home.”

The blueprint considers how to balance the interests of water management, air quality, royalty regimes, workforce development, economic development and attracting investment, supply planning, and opportunities to get economically challenged First Nations bands involved in the energy industry. It has already granted an exploration licence to SWN Resources Canada to search 2.5 million acres of the province for gas, and SWN has committed to investing a minimum of $47 million into the project.

Alward is taking an exceedingly careful and gradual approach to rolling out shale-gas development. He should. He needs to. New Brunswick borders Quebec, where anti-fracking hysteria has reached absurd proportions, with the Quebec government imposing a draconian moratorium on shale-gas exploration, as we’ve seen. New Brunswick is also close to New England, where the American anti-fracking movement has managed a firm foothold.

Environmentalist groups have already started working to mobilize Indian bands in New Brunswick, exploiting them to hijack aboriginal interests just as they have done in western Canada and Quebec.

And they’re stirring up trouble, using fear. In June 2013, members of the Elsipogtog Indian Nation band confronted a seismic testing crew from SWN Resources, accompanied by protesters claiming to be “independent UN observers” (there are no UN observers in Canada). After a heated encounter, the demonstrators towed the company’s trucks onto the nearby native reserves – essentially stealing millions of dollars’ worth of equipment. Later that same month, police arrested protesters trying to block SWN trucks from doing testing in the same area.

The protests turned even more violent and destructive when protesters turned to arson, setting ablaze two of SWN’s seismic rigs. Police had to arrest more than 30 people for breaking the law in the onslaught against the company and its employees.

This is what New Brunswick is up against: the opportunity to develop its economy, finally, in a sustainable and market-oriented way, facing resistance from a handful of professional anti-fracking agitators using local native groups as their pawns. It won’t be an easy battle – the anti-fracking lobby has a lot of resources and support behind them, from well beyond New Brunswick.

But New Brunswick has known for too long what it means to be dependent on others just to get by. To the province’s credit, it seems, so far, determined to overcome the attacks by anti-fracking groups and finally build energy security, and a thriving economy, for itself.

wellandtribune.ca



14 Comments on "What the frack!"

  1. Hugh on Sun, 11th May 2014 3:38 pm 

    Ezra Levant, the brilliant Canadian mind behind “ethical oil”. And like our federal Conservatives, in hysterics about hysteria, expressing fear about fear, in whose mind environmentalists are ‘eco-terrorists’ by default, etc., ad nauseum.

  2. sunweb on Sun, 11th May 2014 5:44 pm 

    As I have said before:
    For those who support fracking, oil sands and the northern pipeline or for those who encourage investing in fracking, oil sands or the northern pipeline, I have this suggestion. Move your home next to a fracking well and put down your water well along side. Or better yet move your children there or better yet move your grandchildren there. Let the pipeline filled with toxic fluid come along the boundaries of your land. The same for the oil sand works in Canada. Move your grandchildren up there in the poisonous air and next to the polluted rivers and environmental degradation.

    So those of you who would promote monetary gains by investing in what you claim are benign activities, put your life where your money is.

    Unfortunately, we are trapped, too many people need jobs because we are making too many people. And none of us will give up our lifestyles.

  3. DC on Sun, 11th May 2014 5:45 pm 

    Here is Ezra(and friend) giving us the straight dope on ‘Ethical Oil’.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYUd7WOdjyU

  4. Plantagenet on Sun, 11th May 2014 6:27 pm 

    Good to hear the people in New Brunswick are finally getting some good jobs, thanks to growth in the NG biz in that province. Its a shame that people in more affluent parts of Canada want to deny the same economic success to the people of New Brunswick that they themselves enjoy.

  5. DC on Sun, 11th May 2014 6:35 pm 

    Thanks to this article, Plant now knows New Brunswick exists, thats something no?

  6. DMyers on Sun, 11th May 2014 7:02 pm 

    I would say there will be horizontal extraction from the money generated by a New Brunswick frack fest. The top tier will get most of the profit, and what trickles down to the lesser New Brunswick inhabitants will be far from sufficient to offset the environmental devastation fracking will leave behind.

    I especially liked this from the article: “Nobody knows yet how much gas is trapped in that thick reservoir; the exploration is just beginning. But Frank McKenna, the province’s former premier and a former Canadian ambassador to the United States, has estimated that developing New Brunswick’s shale-gas industry could generate more than $7 billion in royalties and tax revenues for the government.”

    So nobody knows what the reservoir even holds, and this prick is telling how much it’s worth. Please don’t draw any conclusions from that, whatsoever, and certainly don’t use that completely contrived number to suggest a comparison with California’s annual state budget.

  7. GregT on Sun, 11th May 2014 8:52 pm 

    Ezra Levant is a complete moron. Everything that I have ever heard spouted from his mouth is total crap.

  8. MKohnen on Sun, 11th May 2014 10:18 pm 

    Frank McKenna said that it could generate “more than $7 billion”? Well then, it must be true! Frank McKenna is a politician, a professional politician, so he must know what he’s talking about.

    Let’s face it, if Ezra’s argument had any viability, he wouldn’t be quoting a projection by Frank McKenna to back it up. I would say that if there’s anything this article “proves” (if, indeed, it proves anything) is that jumping on the current “it’s gonna be a hot item” ticket as pushed by Wall Street tends to be a bad idea.

  9. Plantagenet on Sun, 11th May 2014 11:50 pm 

    @Mkohnen

    Right-O. Apple, Google, Hess Oil, Halliburton. All those bad ideas pushed by Wall Street.

    That the kind of advice you read so you can do the opposite.

  10. MKohnen on Mon, 12th May 2014 1:22 am 

    Plant,

    Apple, as pushed by Wall Street, begs the obvious question of, at what time were you to believe Wall Street’s predictions about Apple? When they predicted that Apple was on the way out and shares were dropping like a stone, or after Wall Street realized they were wrong, and in essence “post-prompted” Apple? As for Halliburton, was that so successful because of Wall Street, or because they have enough US politicians in their pocket to create the wars needed to line their coffers? If you compare the US net position to Halliburton’s after the Iraq “shock and awe” party, there’s no doubt who’s interests Dick Cheney et al were taking care of (no question to anyone who isn’t blinded by ultra-nationalism, that is.) And what about the other Wall Street wonders? Enron, Lehman Brothers, and countless other scams and schemes? There may be lots of money to be made by certain types of investors, but to make promises about any scheme-of-the-day balancing a provinces budget is ludicrous. Just as debt-ridden Alberta!

  11. Meld on Mon, 12th May 2014 1:39 am 

    I really hope this guy is heavily invested in fracking, I hope plant is too. Going to be hilarious 🙂

  12. MKohnen on Mon, 12th May 2014 1:43 am 

    PS, that was supposed to be “Just ask debt-ridden Alberta!”

  13. Davy, Hermann, MO on Mon, 12th May 2014 5:38 am 

    Plant, Wall Street is promoting and training their personnel in pathological behavior. Those who are the most aggressively greedy and test the limits of what is criminal are those who are sought out by the best firms. This is a conditioning process that then moves through the system into the legal system and politics. It is no wonder that government is what is today. The level of sophistication of this process, system, and behavior is even causing some of these “Cats” to take pause. We are seeing some whistleblowers coming out and people listening. The problem now is the system is corrupt and rotten to the core. There is no reforming a thoroughly nasty system of economics and governance. What was once a very good system of private property, banking, and markets yielding price discovery, productive capex, and real growth is now predatory, parasitic, manipulated, and rigged. It is typical of a system to move to what we see in governments and markets globally but what is amazing is the speed at which this corruption has moved. It is so far ahead of the checks and balances that were once in place to control what is really always been part of the system. Once a few vital laws, regulations, and due process were eliminated the institutionalized behavior has quickly moved into every corner of our command and control system of the global economic system. It is truly a “canary in the coal mine” of a coming crash. Confidence and liquidity will not last. This system is at its heart corrupt so those participating in this corruption will eventually not trust this corruption themselves, when this happens confidence will be lost among the criminal themselves and the system will fail.

  14. Davy, Hermann, MO on Mon, 12th May 2014 5:57 am 

    This is from Tom Whipple this morning:

    The EIA notes, however, increased production of natural gas liquids is leading to lower prices as the markets cannot currently absorb all that is produced. One study estimates that some 200,000-400,000 b/d of natural gas liquids are simply being sold off as natural gas for lack of a market.

    A new study by Barclays Bank says that the shale oil and gas boom continues because Wall Street is financing unprofitable drilling companies through high-yielding junk debt which has grown nine-fold since the shale boom began. Of the 97 shale oil and gas production companies rated by S&P, 75 are below investment grade. Cheap debt stemming from government policies has been just as important as fracking and horizontal drilling in fostering and sustaining the shale boom.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *