Page added on October 4, 2014
Horizontal drilling and fracking have opened new opportunities for investing in domestic energy, whether for pure-play explorers in developing shales, producers in mature areas, or service companies opening up the monster wells. Oil and Gas Investor Editor-in-Chief Leslie Haines has been following the revolution for nine years, and agreed to share with readers of The Energy Report the names of some beneficiaries of new technology’s multiplier effect.
The Energy Report: As editor-in-chief of Oil and Gas Investor, based in Houston, you follow the development of U.S. shale closely. Is the U.S. really on track to energy independence, or will depletion rates cut this boom short? What are the production numbers telling you?
Leslie Haines: I have been covering shale development since 2005, and it looks like we are on track for energy independence by 2020 or so. However, we’re never going to stop importing oil because supply diversity is prudent.
Depletion rates are significant in every shale play. Some of the depletion rates are quite steep in the early years of a play, but wells tend to produce for 20 years or so at a lower rate, so overall production rates are still growing.
The monthly U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) reports show that in H1/14, U.S. gas natural production alone increased by more than 4 billion cubic feet a day (4 Bcf/d). The bulk is coming from the Northeast, from the Marcellus and Utica plays in Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia. Also, a lot of new natural gas is coming on, in association with oil production in West Texas, in the Permian Basin, and in south Texas, in the Eagle Ford play. While some gas areas might be declining, we’re getting enough new natural gas to offset that decline. In fact, both oil and natural gas production in this country are the highest they’ve been in about 35 years.
Natural gas in storage was down last year, and now we’re refilling. Every summer and fall, you refill storage to prepare for winter. It looks like we’re going to have a lot of gas in storage. We’ve had a fairly mild summer and haven’t had a huge call for natural gas for air conditioning, compared to what it could have been. Between the production and the weather factors, it looks like we’ll have plenty of gas in storage for the fall.
TER: How will the development of monster wells, as they’re being called, impact that balance?
LH: When we say monster well, we are referring to an above-average initial flow. We’re seeing this happen in the Utica play in West Virginia and southern Ohio. Some very large dry-gas wells are being reported with initial flows of 20–25 million cubic feet of gas a day (20–25 MMcf/d). That’s a huge gas well by anybody’s measure. It is just one more example of U.S. production surging due to horizontal drilling and fracking. Those two techniques combined have revolutionized everything in this country and allowed us to recover a lot more of the underground reservoir.
TER: The techniques continue to develop as more environmentally friendly and efficient methods are discovered. What are some new techniques you are seeing?
LH: The size of the average frack is getting quite a bit bigger. It used to be that the horizontal leg might only go out 1,000–2,000 feet (1,000–2,000 ft). Now, it’s going out as far as 5,000–7,000 ft horizontally, so the well bore is exposed to more of the reservoir. The size of the fracks has also gotten bigger, with 20 or 30 frack stages along a lateral. That has increased production.
In one basin, you may find the number of formations that can be tapped is quite numerous. In the Permian Basin of West Texas, for example, more than 5,000 vertical feet of pay can be tapped. If you sink three horizontal legs into that well, three different horizons can be fracked and produce from one well. It triples the effect of that well and acreage.
TER: What’s an example of a company taking advantage of that multiplier effect?
LH: Two good examples are Pioneer Natural Resources Co. (PXD:NYSE) and Concho Resources Inc. (CXO:NYSE) in the Permian Basin. Production is soaring. In fact, Pioneer is one of the companies that recently received special permission from the government to export a little bit of condensate as a test case. Pioneer is a very active proponent of exporting crude.
TER: Is the company testing price impact, or market demand, or something else?
LH: All of the above. The company is trying to prove to the government that we need to be able to export crude oil in addition to refined products like gasoline. It is very controversial.
TER: In the absence of exporting, are we producing too much? The EIA’s Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report showed 2,801 Bcf at the beginning of September. Is oversupply keeping the price of natural gas down?
LH: A lot of Wall Street analysts have reduced their outlooks for oil and gas pricing—and company earnings projections—through the rest of this year and into next year. For example, Bernstein Research just came out with a report in which it is bringing down its natural gas price estimate for 2015 from $4.50/thousand cubic feet ($4.50/Mcf) to $4/Mcf. It plans to leave the price there through 2016.
We are seeing such an incredible surge in supply of both oil and gas that producers, analysts and investors are starting to get a little bit worried. We had very high natural gas prices a few years ago, and then the surge of new production, combined with a mild winter, made the price of natural gas go right back down. At one point, natural gas was below $4/Mcf. It’s come back a little this year, but there is still quite a bit of concern.
TER: Are today’s prices less than what it costs to pull the oil out of the ground?
LH: Producers are still making money, but the prices for drilling and fracking are inching up because there’s so much demand for wells to be drilled and fracked.
TER: You sat on a panel at the Stansberry Society conference in Dallas with S&A Resource Report newsletter writer Matt Badiali earlier this year to talk about the future of shale. He divides the shales into mature (the Bakken and the Eagle Ford), and developing (the Tuscaloosa, Utica and Cline areas). Are investors rewarding companies with shale play diversity, or is it considered smarter to master one shale type?
LH: The stock market used to reward companies for diversity. Investors wanted to see a balance between oil and gas, and two, three or four different project areas. However, that has changed. Now investors favor pure-play companies. A company like Oasis Petroleum Inc. (OAS:NYSE), which is in just one play, the Bakken, has done very well in the last year.
Sanchez Energy Corp. (SN:NYSE), which is in the Eagle Ford and Tuscaloosa Marine Shale, is not being rewarded for the Mississippi project yet. The Tuscaloosa play is still developing, and hasn’t proven to be economic yet. The company has some expensive wells with downhole technical challenges. The players in that area are still working on solving the geology. In the Eagle Ford, however, Sanchez is very experienced and successful. That part of its business is well recognized.
But, in general, I would say that diversity is not being rewarded in the market at this time. It’s better for companies to focus on two or three plays at the most, and in well-established areas like the Bakken, the Eagle Ford and the Marcellus.
TER: Are there still upside opportunities in the established shales?
LH: The Marcellus Formation is considered the second largest gas field in the world. Production keeps growing every quarter. It’s difficult for a company to get in there now. Most of the lease positions are already carved out. Companies have gone beyond finding the sweet spots, and are focusing on two things. One is how to drill a more efficient well faster, while reducing costs. The other is infrastructure. The Marcellus and Utica plays are constrained because there is not enough pipeline to get all the gas to market. A ton of midstream projects have been proposed and are underway. Billions of dollars are being spent to build pipeline infrastructure to move the gas not only to the population centers in the northeast, but also to eastern Canada. Some of the gas is going to be piped down to the petrochemical plants on the Gulf Coast. Some of the gas is even being piped to the West, to Chicago and beyond.
TER: This sounds like more of a manufacturing operation, now that companies don’t seem to be drilling dry holes anymore. Who are the main players?
LH: Companies like Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. (COG:NYSE), Range Resources Corp. (RRC:NYSE), Chesapeake Energy Corp. (CHK:NYSE), Petroleum Development Corp. (PETD:NASDAQ) and EQT Corp. (EQT:NYSE) are doing quite well in the Marcellus. The same thing is true in the Bakken, the Eagle Ford and the Permian Basin. Some 20 companies may drill a play, but a handful do most of the work. And they are the bigger companies.
TER: Do you envision mergers and acquisitions in that space, as some of these companies mature?
LH: It’s really about the play maturing. We see a similar pattern in every shale play. Companies decide that a play is relatively mature, and that they can make a higher return somewhere else. They put their assets on the market, sell to somebody else in that play or to a master limited partnership (MLP), and then redeploy their money into another play that might have a faster growth trajectory.
TER: What is a recent example of that?
LH: Marathon Oil Corp. (MRO:NYSE) sold its North Sea assets to redeploy more capital to the Eagle Ford, which has much higher returns.
TER: You wrote a September cover story on service and supply companies, which is one way investors are leveraging the oil and gas industry. Are margins increasing in that business?
LH: It looks like they’re about to, yes. Almost 1,900 rigs are drilling in this country at any given time. I’d say 90% of those wells will need to be fracked. That is an enormous demand for rig crews, frack crews and all the associated equipment and materials. Last year, about 17 million hydraulic horsepower was installed. The amount of horsepower available for fracking has probably doubled in the last five years. Everything is bigger, longer, higher pressure—more, more, more. Service companies have pricing power because there is such a frenzy of activity right now.
TER: There are many types of service companies. Is there one part of that industry that’s growing faster than the others?
LH: One bright spot is in companies that provide sand for fracking. They’ve been doing extremely well in the marketplace. Their stocks are way up, and they keep adding new capacity, to deliver yet more sand to the marketplace for fracking. The oil field service index, PHLX Oil Service Sector (OSX:NASDAQ), has risen steadily since January, and the hottest subsector seems to be the frack sand providers. Some of them have tripled in the past 12 months.
TER: What are some examples of solid frack sand providers?
LH: US Silica Holdings (SLCA:NYSE), Hi-Crush Partners LP (HCLP:NYSE) and Emerge Energy Services LP (EMES:NYSE) are three. Their revenues mirror the increase in drilling activity, which could be 14% in the next year. That is why analysts are telling us that it looks like profit margins have come off their lows, and service prices are starting to rise again.
TER: Thank you for taking the time to talk to us.
LH: Thank you.
Leslie Haines is editor-in-chief of Oil and Gas Investor magazine. She began her journalism career in 1980 in Williston, North Dakota, at the Williston Daily Herald. She was the energy and business reporter for the Midland Reporter-Telegram in Midland, Texas, in 1982 and 1983. She joined Hart Energy Publishing in Denver in late 1983 as a copy editor. Soon thereafter she began writing for Western Oil and Gas World. In 1985, she joined the staff of Oil and Gas Investor magazine. She was named managing editor two years later, and became editor in January 1992. In November 1992, the Independent Petroleum Association of America awarded Haines with the 2nd Annual Lloyd Unsell Award for Excellence in Petroleum Journalism. She is a former president of the Houston Producers’ Forum, and is on the board of the Houston Energy Finance Discussion Group.
19 Comments on "U.S. Will Never Stop Importing Oil, but We May Start Exporting"
eugene on Sat, 4th Oct 2014 4:19 pm
The key words here are “investor”. PR piece.
Plantagenet on Sat, 4th Oct 2014 4:38 pm
The US ALREADY exports oil. Alaska just sent a shipment of oil to Asia. Oil from the Bakken and elsewhere is being exported to Canada. AND the Obama administration just issued waivers for Pioneer (PDX) to export oil from Texas.
GregT on Sat, 4th Oct 2014 5:46 pm
The US is a NET IMPORTER of oil.
To say that the US exports oil, is like me saying that I lend other people money, when I need to borrow that same money myself.
DMyers on Sat, 4th Oct 2014 7:00 pm
“However, we’re never going to stop importing oil because supply diversity is prudent,” says Mr. Haines at the outset of the interview.
Let me rephrase that, in a completely unauthorized rephrasing. “We’re always going to have to mix in some good shit to boost up the mediocre shit we’re producing, if internal combustion continues to dominate our transportation.” At least we can say this is a true justification for importing oil, even at the cusp of energy independence, pending in 2020.
I would describe the question posed as two questions: Buy shale? or Bye shale? Haines is clearly a proponent of option 1, but he offers a better idea.
“One bright spot is in companies that provide sand for fracking,” Haines comments naively. That’s it! Make your fortune selling sand! That shit is everywhere. Dig it, dump it, ship it, and dump it again. That’s the formula. Copy and paste. You’ll be selling sand when the oil is gone, cause they’ll never quit trying.
Perk Earl on Sat, 4th Oct 2014 7:43 pm
Where is all this sand coming from?
DMyers on Sat, 4th Oct 2014 8:02 pm
Perk Earl, I was thinking about new hard labor laws in all fifty states. Inmates can hammer down sand from stone, 12/7/365. If you’re going to live under the MIC, you have to think like the MIC.
Aside from that, we dredge the ocean. Anything gets in the way, dredge that up too. Aside from that, you can buy it at Home Depot, and your neighbor’s kid has a sand box. Look around the perimeter of your basement. Consider the grouting in your shower. It’s everywhere.
rockman on Sat, 4th Oct 2014 10:10 pm
Actually the specs on frac sand are very specific and very stringent. And in many cases the propant isn’t natural sand but tiny manmade beads. Those are particularly critical in very high pressure fracs: natural sand would be crushed while ceramic beads can be designed to handle those extremes.
And one more time: the US currently exports about 3 million bbls of “proxy oil”. Proxy oil??? The US has become a major exporter of refined products. Even if domestic oil production were to satisfy domestic consumption the US would still be one of the largest oil importers on the planet. US consumers don’t compete for foreign or domestic oil…US refineries do. Our consumers compete with foreign consumers for refined products. Refined products which are not banned from exports.
So far.
Nony on Sat, 4th Oct 2014 11:14 pm
Nigeria is ass out (first month in over 40 years no shipments to the U.S. 🙂
http://www.osundefender.org/?p=189611
Article also talks about how the problem is that Nigeria has “high quality” oil. So much for the shale not “being oil”. Seems good enough to take market share.
Nony on Sat, 4th Oct 2014 11:22 pm
http://247wallst.com/energy-economy/2014/10/04/u-s-oil-and-gas-rig-count-falling/
330 gas rigs! And price is stuck at 4$! And that’s not in an environment of demand dropping. Volume is UP! WOWOWOWOW! The Marcellus is mighty….
Makati1 on Sat, 4th Oct 2014 11:27 pm
Hmm. I just read two articles stating that the fraking bubble has about 2-3 more years until it bursts taking out most of the ‘independence’ of US oil, at which time oil prices will go through the roof.
Any comments?
Nony on Sat, 4th Oct 2014 11:36 pm
http://www.mrt.com/business/oil/article_05b64fcc-4c14-11e4-bcd7-dbc9bb6fa14c.html
So much for sweet spots running out. So much for moving onto the worse acreage. So much for “the technology isn’t changing”.
Nony on Sat, 4th Oct 2014 11:42 pm
Makati:
How many peakers even said it would happen at all? How many came up with their pessimistic forecasts (like Rune and Piccolo).
You read your little peaker articles. I’ll stick to EIA, IEA, Goldman Sachs, Woods Mackenzie, blabla. They all see it going until 2020.
MKohnen on Sun, 5th Oct 2014 12:45 am
Nony,
In 2004, how many cornucopian peak-deniers were saying we’d be saved because of fracking? They assured us we didn’t have to worry because conventional oil would never run out. Now, they (and that includes you) tell us we’re saved because, EVEN THOUGH CONVENTIONAL PEAKED AND HAS BEEN FALLING STEADILY, fracking has come out of the blue to save us. Which is to say that, back in 2004, the deniers didn’t have a clue what they were talking about either. So, when your fracking dream comes to an end, what next? Could you tell us this time?
GregT on Sun, 5th Oct 2014 12:52 am
Nony,
2020 is 5 years and 2 months away. A very short time period from now. If the EIA, IEA, Goldman Sachs, Woods Mackenzie, blablablablabla, only see it going until 2020, then they are ‘little peakers’ themselves. Personally, I am a big doomer peaker, and I believe that sometime between 2025 and 2035 we are in for a world of hurt. Your cornies, are far more pessimistic than doomers like me.
I hope that they are wrong, and I am right. Either way, the future isn’t looking all that bright.
Plan accordingly.
meld on Sun, 5th Oct 2014 4:54 am
I really don’t understand how people can’t see that we are in the collapse right now. This is it folks, this is what collapse feels like to the millions without jobs, without food and rioting/protesting around the globe. Our personal “apocalypse” will come at some point in the future no doubt (when we lose our jobs or the health system fails us) but for now the collapse is here and it’s accelerating.
Makati1 on Sun, 5th Oct 2014 6:17 am
meld, you are right on again! We are in the collapse and have been since oh, maybe 1970 when we started printing, instead of producing, wealth. That the speed of decent is hardly noticeable, does not mean we are not falling. If people would take off the rose colored glasses and the blinders, they would see the decline all around them. Especially in the West and their wannabees.
Whether it is 2015, 2017, or even 2020, it is going to end in a splat in the hard stone sidewalk of reality. When you jump out of an airplane with a parachute, you don’t notice you are falling if you don’t look down, or so my father told me. (He jumping into Normandy on D-Day.) I hope you have your ‘chute’ prepared.
Davy on Sun, 5th Oct 2014 7:50 am
Let us look at a BAU failure and along with it an end of the normal globalism we have come to know. The end of just-in-time far flung production and distribution supporting delocalized locals in a codependence. An end to a global financial arrangement that allows confidence in exchange allowing massive global liquidity for this production and distribution. If you look at what reboot level remains when the dust settles then you have to look at who has the energy resources and who doesn’t. I don’t just mean hydrocarbons I mean food and adequate water. Who is in overshoot to carrying capacity in relation to a population in relation to local support? Asia is in a deadly critical position with half the world population many in mega cities all in an area smaller than Russia. Food, hydrocarbons, and water will be a serious concern in Asia much more than any other region. Overshoot is what it is and Asia is there now. North and South America can fare better with significant food potential and adequate FF per population density. If Europe and Russia can work together Europe/Russia is positioned well enough with food and FF. Africa is a basket case now so surely a worse normal. In any case all regions are in a position of a fall that lacks predication. This fall will be contingent on the how, when, and where the break occurs. The same “h.w.w” on reboot to some kind of stability. What good is any resources if the command and control can’t resume to manage these resources? What good are these resources if the infrastructure is destroyed to extract and manage them? The all-important degree and duration of the descent will be in effect. There is no way to predict this situation. I personally think we have the momentum to see a “bouncing normal” BAU for 3-5 years per Shorts (& others) hard hitting analysis. The systematic disturbances and “black swans” events may end BAU before the hydrocarbon predicament kicks in. “Or” more likely it is what often happens to an aircraft when more than one issue causes failure with converging reinforcing catastrophic events.
bobinget on Sun, 5th Oct 2014 12:05 pm
When WTI and Brent merge in price, exportation will become less attractive trades.
The Saudis as well as the US will be exporting more
finished products on compilations of two huge refineries. (700,000 Bp/d each)
When XOM captain Rex Tillerson calls for US crude exports, his motive, additional profit, lower gasoline prices, not so much.
Mideast crude oil expenses rise exponentially when we add security and health care for wounded uniformed and civilian fighting personal. KSA is coughing up billions for equipment and
personal in Yemen and Syria. Bottom line KSA can’t
lower production without drawing on foreign reserves.
rockman on Sun, 5th Oct 2014 3:01 pm
“If you compare now to 10 years ago, sure Nigeria is better off. If you compare it to 2 years ago, they are worse”. OK then Nony… let’s go with a shorter time line if you like
“Total federally collected revenue for the second quarter of 2014 stood at an increase of 4.3 per cent above the first quarter of the year.
A breakdown of the gross oil revenue showed that receipt from crude oil and gas sales stood at N577.41 billion as against N516.63 billion realized in the previous quarter of the year.
The average price of Nigeria’s reference crude, the Bonny Light rose by 1.7 per cent above the level in the first quarter. World crude oil demand in the second quarter of 2014 increased by 0.8 per cent.
Yes: According to the US Department of Energy, Nigeria did not export a single barrel of crude to US-based refiners in July for the first time since records started in 1973.
Poor Nigeria… what are they to do to prevent drowning in their own oil?
According to Platts Nigerian oil sales to Asia’s four largest oil importers – China, Japan, India and South Korea – have risen more than 40 per cent so far this year over the 2013 level.
All depends how you spin it: Nigeria gas lost its market share of US oil imports. And the US has lost one its largest sources of oil imports to the Asian markets. We’ll see who that works out best for long term.