Page added on October 17, 2011
It began in Tunisia and Egypt, then spread throughout the Middle East and North Africa. It spilled into Spain, Greece, and Ireland. It leapfrogged to Wall Street. And this past weekend it erupted in London, Rome, Paris, Tokyo, Taipei, and Sydney. In hundreds of towns and cities around the world the uprising’s refrain is similar: economic misery resulting from fizzling economic growth is leading protesters to question corruption both in governments and in financial institutions, and to demand an end to extreme economic inequality.
As long as economies grew, inequality was tolerable. And if the rabble demanded perks, governments could simply borrow money to fund social programs. Corruption could fester unnoticed. But now the economic tide is no longer lifting all boats. Bursting financial bubbles have led economies to contract. That has in turn led to falling tax revenues, which have made existing government debts in several key countries unrepayable. Therefore government bonds held by banks as assets suddenly have little value. Which causes the economy to teeter further. The system is broken.
The universal solution: austerity—a strategy of cutting government spending, government jobs, and government services to the poor and middle classes. Suddenly social safety nets are being withdrawn, and extreme economic inequality is no longer socially tolerable.
The only thing that could stop the uprising is a return to growth—which would generate new jobs, higher tax revenues, and solvency in the financial industry. But instead the world economy seems poised on a precipice perhaps more dangerous than the one it faced in 2008. This means the protesters likely aren’t going home anytime soon. For governments, there are only two realistic responses: repression or major reform
Brutal police and military repression of the protests could buy time for politicians, but it would solve nothing. The unrest would go underground and tear at the social fabric, leading eventually to revolution or societal breakdown.
Reform, if it is to make a difference, must be fundamental. It must start by addressing issues of economic inequality, but then must eliminate the massive debt overhang that plagues not just governments but households and the entire financial sector. In essence, policy makers must cobble together a new economic model that meets human needs in the absence of economic growth.
Politicians take note: Forces are being unleashed that cannot be tamed. So far, crisis has been dealt with by a combination of denial and delay. Those tactics no longer work. Extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures.
5 Comments on "Richard Heinberg: End-of-Growth Uprising Goes Global"
cusano on Mon, 17th Oct 2011 11:28 pm
This is scary stuff. I’ve been a firm believer that the increasing costs of energy would tear us apart. This is more organic. Almost everyone (99%) of us can identify with OWS. This is the fuel of revolutionary acts should the government fail to listen.
antichrist on Tue, 18th Oct 2011 3:47 am
so, no commies yet ,eh?….hahahahaa,nothing will save you all, dontcha got it yet?…party is reeeallyy over…bye,doomed.
JOnathan on Tue, 18th Oct 2011 5:44 pm
As Nouriel Roubini and others have been saying, the only way out is debt forgiveness. Let student loans be part of bankruptcy. Force banks to write down loans.
We must recognize that when you lend money at interest, the actual amount needed in the economy to repay the previous years debts, GROWS EXPONENTIALLY. An we finally got to Asymptote of the curve and the numbers got too big to comprehend anymore.
JOnathan on Tue, 18th Oct 2011 5:45 pm
All money is an abstract concept based on confidence.
Kenz300 on Tue, 18th Oct 2011 6:03 pm
The top 1% and their huge support of selected politicians has allowed the greed to go unchecked. Corporations are not people and should not be allowed to spend unlimited sums on election campaigns.
The media, police, politicians and the wealthy should not all be in bed together.
We are beginning to see the close ties in the hacking scandal in the UK. Has the agenda driven media with their 24/7 informercials of support for select policies that benefit corporate institutions been fully exposed?