The price of crude oil has fallen roughly 60 percent since mid-2014, which has largely been put down to worries of a global glut of crude, coupled with dwindling consumption.
But after four years of Brent crude remaining relatively stable at $100 per barrel, changes in production and consumption “fall short of a fully satisfactory explanation” for the abrupt collapse in oil prices, a new report has found.
Instead, the Bank for International Standards (BIS) blames the decision taken by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) at a November meeting to focus on market share, rather than cutting output, for the collapse in the oil price.
A report from the BIS, the global forum for central banks, published Saturday said the last two episodes of comparable oil price declines were seen in 1996 and 2008 and were associated with sizeable reductions of oil consumption and, in 1996, with a significant expansion of production.
“This seems to be in stark contrast to developments since mid-2014, during which time oil production has been close to prior expectations and oil consumption has been only a little weaker than forecast,” the bank said.
“Rather, the steepness of the price decline and very large day-to-day price changes are reminiscent of a financial asset. As with other financial assets, movements in the price of oil are driven by changes in expectations about future market conditions. In this respect, the recent OPEC decision not to cut production has been key to the fall in the oil price,” the group said.
The finance minister of top OPEC exporter Saudi Arabia told CNBC this week that the country will continue to dip into its cash reserves and use its ability to borrow to temper the ongoing storm in oil markets. Ibrahim Abdulaziz Al-Assaf said Saudia Arabia had been preparing for a period of cheap oil.
“We have learned from the past…obviously the oil market, everybody knows, goes through ups and downs and peaks and valleys,” he said on Thursday.
“We have the resources…we (have) built the buffers to help us in sustaining our policies and not disrupting them so I am comfortable that we will be able to continue that,” Al-Assaf said.
But OPEC are not the only culprits. The BIS said the substantial increase in debt borne by the oil sector in recent years was also a major factor in exacerbating the oil price.
The willingness of investors to lend against oil reserves has enabled oil firms to borrow large amounts, while energy companies have issued substantial amounts of investment-grade and high-yield bonds, the BIS said.
“Against this background of high debt, a fall in the price of oil weakens the balance sheets of producers and tightens credit conditions, potentially exacerbating the price drop as a result of sales of oil assets,” the bank said.
“The build-up of debt in the oil sector is a reminder that high debt levels can induce significant macro-financial interactions. Such interactions need to be understood better in order fully to appreciate the macroeconomic impact of falling oil prices,” they added.


Davy on Sun, 8th Feb 2015 7:45 am
CNBC is always looking for excuses to support its failed economic message. This is just another example of a well funded MSM spewing puk of an an agenda unsupported by facts.
Dredd on Sun, 8th Feb 2015 10:46 am
Anything and everything by prayer because Oilah Akbar y’all.
Apneaman on Sun, 8th Feb 2015 12:06 pm
Written by NBC’s very own Brian Williams.
Perk Earl on Sun, 8th Feb 2015 12:16 pm
“Instead, the Bank for International Standards (BIS) blames the decision taken by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) at a November meeting to focus on market share, rather than cutting output, for the collapse in the oil price.”
Why is OPEC blamed? It has been repeated ad infinitum that OPEC does not want to lose market share, but rather let marginal oil sources that have been increasing like production from LTO in the US to be forced by lower price to greatly reduce production.
What if every time there was an excess in autos on the market (for the demand) smaller auto makers blamed GM & Toyota for not reducing their production? That would be an absurd position to take because all auto makers zealously hold on to their market share. So why is anything else expected in regards to oil market share?
Plantagenet on Sun, 8th Feb 2015 12:28 pm
The Saudis just cut the price of their oil AGAIN.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-02-06/saudis-deepen-asia-oil-discount-to-a-a-record-low
Each cut in price by the Saudis drives the price of oil down even farther.
DiscoPants on Sun, 8th Feb 2015 12:40 pm
It doesn’t seem very capitalistic to expect a low cost producer to reduce production so as to prop up the price for higher cost producers.
I guess Merika ain’t too keen on capitalism these days.
Speculawyer on Sun, 8th Feb 2015 3:34 pm
I HATE these articles. The price of oil fell because the USA massively increased production by some 4+ million barrels per day.
And now we are whining about OPEC NOT being an evil cartel that conspires to intentionally reduce supply to drive up prices? WTF?
People have gone loopy.
Apneaman on Sun, 8th Feb 2015 6:21 pm
The Decline of the American Empire and Industrial Civilization, as seen through the eyes of a middle-class white guy.
Thursday, February 05, 2015
Nuremberg Redux
“We’re understandably upset about this, but we feel impotent to effect political change. Instead, we lash out at convenient – i.e., weak – targets, such as immigrants, Muslims and other groups with marginal status in the US.”
http://ridingtherubicon.blogspot.ca/?zx=d8ddff3ce3a952e1
shortonoil on Sun, 8th Feb 2015 6:31 pm
The price of oil fell because the USA massively increased production by some 4+ million barrels per day.
Actually it is 3.25 mb/d, but the quality of LTO is so low that it can not command a high enough price to pay for its very high cost of production. The price was only maintained for a few years through massive debt formation. Now that the debt bubble that was created is collapsing a lot of people at the MSM think OPEC should fund it by cutting “their” production. If it wasn’t so pathetic, it would be funny. It is frightening that such an absurdity can be so widely orchestrated.
http://www.thehillsgroup.org/
Northwest Resident on Sun, 8th Feb 2015 6:36 pm
Maybe we can get our resident troll to change his constant refrain to “poor quality oil glut”.
GregT on Sun, 8th Feb 2015 6:54 pm
According to the ‘BP Statistical review of World Energy’ last published report in June of 2014, even after the US had increased oil production from 6.7Mbpd in 2008, to 10Mbpd in 2013, world oil consumption continued to grow faster than oil production by .8% per year.
http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/Energy-economics/statistical-review-2014/BP-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2014-full-report.pdf
The theory of the price of oil falling because of the”massive” increase of some 4+Mbpd doesn’t hold water spec.
Calling others loopy, when what you are advocating yourself IS loopy, is like the pot calling the kettle black.
Makati1 on Sun, 8th Feb 2015 7:11 pm
American’s banned mirrors when the century turned. They are incapable of seeing themselves in today’s chaotic world except as victims who need to blame others for their inadequacies/weakness/greed.
Speculawyer on Sun, 8th Feb 2015 9:00 pm
“world oil consumption continued to grow faster than oil production by .8% per year.”
If this were really true, then the price of oil would not have dropped.
In fact it is not even possible for that to be true since how can we consume oil that that was not produced? (Sure, you could say we drew down some stored oil but the stores are not that big, could not support that for years, and the current stores are going UP not down.) Think before you type.
Davy on Mon, 9th Feb 2015 6:34 am
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-02-09/europe-us-risk-after-greece-rejects-european-ultimatum-ukraine-peace-talks-falter
Folks, this does not bode well for the price of oil. A Grexit and the diminishment of the Euro to EURUSD to all-time lows of about 0.90 and or the unraveling of the EU through a contagion to the other PIGS would almost surely depress oil prices further. Dollar goes up and economic activity goes down in the EU what a baseball bat.
This demand destruction phase in the global economy appears to have a lot of time yet to play out. I personally feel we are transitioning out of the bumpy plateau and into the descent phase but that is naturally speculation. In any case we have storm clouds on the horizon. Real damage to global growth is a potential everywhere we look. I am not sure if oil will fall much but I see the down side still on and the upside subdued.
rockman on Mon, 9th Feb 2015 7:00 am
Spec – ““world oil consumption continued to grow faster than oil production by .8% per year. If this were really true, then the price of oil would not have dropped.”
That’s a tough dynamic to characterize IMHO. The problem is that as price declines one would expect consumption to increase. And vice versa. But then you have players like China that significantly increased consumption as prices increases and countries such as Greece that will likely see consumption decrease with lower prices give the deteriorating state of their economy.
Even on a global basis there’s a lag time: 2008 avg oil price = $98/bbl; 2009 avg oil price = $58/bbl. Yet the world consumed a little more oil in 2008 than 2009. Given the apparent current increase in US motor fuel consumption that might not be the case this time around.