Page added on November 21, 2013
accident in Omar Mokhtar Avenue in downtown Tripoli. Nobody was injured but there’s a bumper hanging off the back of a car. In just a few seconds, a group gathers around.
“Forget about insurance companies in Libya,” says Mansur, a 30-year-old satellite dish installer. “The main problem is that you can easily run into somebody who produces a gun; everyone carries one in their glove box. In such a case there are two options:
“You can get back to your car smoothly and leave, but you could also call a brother or a cousin of yours in one of those militias so he backs you up with heavy artillery.”
In Libya, the police and the army are names on paper to entities that do not exist on the ground. Security, or the lack of it, comes from the myriad insurgent groups who rose up against former dictator Muammar Gaddafi, but who only pay allegiance to local, or even individual, interests.
Government officials put their number at around 250,000. Nobody knows the exact figure.
But Libyans are increasingly angry since last Friday, when Tripoli witnessed the biggest spike in violence since the end of the war in 2011. A peaceful march meant to protest the impunity with which militias operate in the country’s capital ended up with 48 killed and almost 500 injured.
Local residents have been gathering in renewed protests such as the one in Algiers Square in central Tripoli last Sunday. Abdul Hamid Najah, a local lawyer, was there.
“Gaddafi would have reacted in the very same way, but we all knew he was ready to kill in cold blood. How could we possibly receive the same treatment from the very same people who helped us oust him? One of my neighbours was killed and another had to be taken urgently to Italy after he was badly injured.”
He says the “passivity” of the government is the main source of instability in post-war Libya.
“As long as militias remain in Tripoli, violence can only increase,” Mosarek Hobrara, another among the protesters and a human rights activist working for mediation from the Switzerland-based Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue, told IPS. The sooner they leave, the better for us Libyans.”
Just behind him stood high school student Maha Hamid carrying a hand-made banner: ‘Tripoli is calling for help’.
The 48-hour emergency declared by the Libyan government after Friday’s killings shut most of the otherwise busy centre of the Libyan capital. Local schools and the university also closed.
“In Tripoli I only feel completely safe in Gorji (southwest of the capital) because the local militia is Amazigh,” Shokri, a member of Libya’s biggest minority group, told IPS.
“I usually go home on the weekends but always use bypass roads to avoid the main route across Aziziyah (south of the capital). That’s the territory controlled by the Warshafana tribe, who were loyal to Gaddafi.”
Text messages are a popular warning device: ‘Militias are clashing in eastern Tripoli, better take the ring road’, says one typical message.
Some like Kemal Hassan make things simpler. He is one of the thousands of Tunisians currently working in Tripoli due to a dent in tourism back home. He says he never goes out after six. He hasn’t left the hotel at all since last Friday.
“There’s random shooting in the streets every now and then. Most here got used to it but I’m afraid I can’t.”
In fact, “random” describes much of Tripoli’s daily life. A group of four can suddenly pop out of a rickety car and start asking for “papers” to all those stuck in a rush-hour traffic jam. This IPS reporter was requested to hand his passport to a group of teenagers dressed in plain clothes but armed with assault rifles. But such harassment is a relatively minor problem.
Abu Muntalib was killed last Saturday by militiamen who broke into the Fallah refugee camp south of Tripoli. Muftar, who was displaced from what is now the ghost town Tawargha, shared the details with IPS:
“A group of men came on Friday night in a car with a Misrata sticker on the windshield and asked us whether we were from Tawargha. Four other men came back the following day; they aimed their rifles at our people, killing one and wounding two.”
Once a vibrant city of 30,000, Tawargha was turned in Gaddafi’s last days into his headquarters during a two-month siege of the rebel enclave of nearby Misrata, 187 km southeast of capital Tripoli. Displaced families handed IPS a list of relatives who had been allegedly kidnapped at gunpoint by Misrata militias over the last few weeks, the majority of them at the very entrance of the camp.
“We don’t dare to go outside but, as you see, even inside we can be assaulted,” Yousef Mohamed, a 20-year-old displaced person told IPS from inside the barracks where he was recovering from a gunshot in his left leg.
People from all walks of life complain about the dire security situation in their country. Wail Brahimi is one of those Libyans who returned from exile in the heat of the revolution “to help rebuild the country.” Two years after Gaddafi was brutally killed by rebels, this lawyer from the University of London is considering going back to the UK.
“So far we have avoided a new war thanks to a fragile balance of forces, but we are all aware that this cannot last much longer. Actually, we might well be on the brink of civil war after last Friday incidents.”
6 Comments on "Libya’s Fragile Peace Cracks"
Arthur on Thu, 21st Nov 2013 3:06 pm
The West destroyed yet another essentially national-socialist type of political system, including dictator, and paved the way for Islamic fundamentalism; that is a political system even less suitable for integration into the NWO.
J-Gav on Thu, 21st Nov 2013 6:35 pm
The Western ‘venture’ in Libya was a disaster from the beginning and predictably so, since it was largely set off by French pseudo-philosopher Bernard Henri-Lévy. Yes, that’s right, he’s the one who convinced the sap Sarkozy it was a ‘good idea.’ Since then, so far, we’ve seen the Mali mess, the Egyptian ‘Arab-spring’ back-firing,the Bahraini workers’ rights movement quelled in blood by the Saudis, tension ratcheting up in Lebanon, civil war breaking out in Syria, etc. Is there no-one remaining out there who retains the age-old option of diplomacy instead of just smashing things to bits? I guess we’ll find out in the new round of talks with Iran in Geneva …
DC on Thu, 21st Nov 2013 7:05 pm
Libyans can send there thanks from being ‘liberated’ to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave atten B. Obomber and Nicolas Sarkozy(ret.). If there is one thing the US is still good at, its destroying things. Amerikans cant build anything, but they are very good at destroying things-especially other peoples things. Like there schools, water systems, gov’t, and ending their lives. I wonder how amerikans would take it if the rest of the world bombed their infrastructure to rubble and left roving gangs to do what they will? And then had the gall to claim they did to ‘save’ the country?
The thing this article fails to mention, despite going into some detail about how bad things are now, it really fails to discuss none of these conditions existed prior to the US\Nato terror-bombing campaign. All that instability is music to the ears of the US and its allied oil corporations. That was the goal all along. To partition up the country, drain its resources dry, and leave the rest of the country out to dry.
Arthur on Thu, 21st Nov 2013 9:56 pm
French pseudo-philosopher Bernard Henri-Lévy
You are being PC J-Gav, and you know it. You leave the essential thing out about Levy (and Sarko), people both responsible for France leaving the traditional anti-Anglo Gaullist trajectory and turn France in a staunch American neocon satrap. In the end it is the DNA/blood that decides, always. France should take care that they don’t lose the moral right to be a leading European nation, together with Germany. Adenauer-de Gaulle, that is the desired direction, not Levy-Wolfowitz.
J-Gav on Thu, 21st Nov 2013 10:11 pm
Arthur – Not developing all the aspects of recent Western/North African history isn’t PC, it’s just recognition that this isn’t the place for it. As for “moral” bragging rights in Europe, I frankly don’t see who’s got any left. Everybody’s kow-towing to somebody, whether it’s to ink a big contract (with China, the Saudis, etc) or to keep the financial overlords happy. Granted, the De Gaulle/Adenauer approach made perfect sense in its time but times have changed … We’ll see if the eastern pull gains ground on the western pull in Germany in the coming years. What would make sense today would be to make efforts to bring Russia into the Western camp but the old cold-warriors still don’t want that, do they?
Arthur on Thu, 21st Nov 2013 10:52 pm
Maybe Russia should pull the EU into the Europe of the Europeans camp. Today he scored another victory:
http://deepresource.wordpress.com/2013/11/21/another-victory-for-putin-no-eu-ukraine-association/
For the moment Putin is the man. Possibly he is the next de Gaulle.
The coming crash of the western financial system is going to change everything. That’s going to happen before ‘peak oil’ begin to bite.