Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on May 17, 2010

Bookmark and Share

Israel plays wargame assuming Iran has nuclear bomb

Public Policy

Though the wargame saw Iran declaring itself a nuclear power in 2011, the ensuing confrontations were by proxy, in Lebanon.

In one, emboldened Hezbollah guerrillas fired missiles at the Defence Ministry in Tel Aviv. That was followed by U.S. and Israeli intelligence findings that Iran had slipped radioactive materials to its Lebanese cohort, to assemble a crude device.

Neither move drew Israeli attacks, though Ben-Eliahu said his delegation had received discreet encouragement from Arab rivals of Iran to “go all the way” in retaliating.

Instead, Israel conferred with the United States, which publicly supported its ally’s “right to self-defence” and mobilised military reinforcements for the region while quietly insisting the Israelis stand down to give crisis talks a chance.

“As far as the United States was concerned, Israel was trigger-happy. It sought to use the Hezbollah (missile) attack as justification for what the United States was told would be an all-out war,” said Dan Kurtzer, a former U.S. ambassador to Tel Aviv who played President Barack Obama.

Kurtzer voiced satisfaction with his team’s response to the “dirty bomb,” which entailed cajoling U.N. Security Council powers into mounting an armed intervention against Hezbollah.

“Countries like China and Russia have their own terrorists, and don’t want to see them getting nuclear weapons,” he said.

“In certain circumstances, agile U.S. diplomacy can actually work in this region, and it ends up not only leaving Israel in check but it also ends up (with Washington) leading a willing international coalition.”

Reuters



2 Comments on "Israel plays wargame assuming Iran has nuclear bomb"

  1. hoangkybactien on Mon, 17th May 2010 10:40 pm 

    quote: “Countries like China and *** have their own terrorists…” end quote.

    In China, in summer 1989, in Tiananmen square, who were the terrorists and who were not? The answer should be obvious to an average person.

    Dalai Lama, a Tibetan monk who many people and world leaders have met face to face, has been accused by Chinese Communist Government as a terrorist and saparatist. Dear readers, who is/are the terroists/liars in this case?

    Thousands of Tibetan monks and nuns and ordinary Tibetan people have been tortured and murdered under the label “terroists/separatists” by Chinese Communist government. Who are really terrorists in this case?

    With communists, one should look at what they do as opposed to listen to what they say.

    In China and in the world, I say, Chinese (Korean/Vietnamese/Cuban as well) communists are the worst terrorists to world peace today.

  2. Keith McClary on Mon, 17th May 2010 11:25 pm 

    There is no explicit connection to peak oil in this article.

    By selecting it the editors seem to be suggesting that this conflict is about oil.

    If so, why not give us some articles that argue this connection explicitly?

    :>)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *