Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on April 1, 2016

Bookmark and Share

ISIS Turns Saudis Against the Kingdom, and Families Against Their Own

ISIS Turns Saudis Against the Kingdom, and Families Against Their Own thumbnail

The men were not hardened militants. One was a pharmacist, another a heating and cooling technician. One was a high school student.

They were six cousins, all living in Saudi Arabia, all with the same secret. They had vowed allegiance to the Islamic State — and they planned to kill another cousin, a sergeant in the kingdom’s counterterrorism force.

And that’s what they did. In February, the group abducted Sgt. Bader al-Rashidi, dragged him to the side of a road south of this central Saudi city, and shot and killed him. With video rolling, they condemned the royal family, saying it had forsaken Islam.

Then they fled into the desert. The video spread rapidly across the kingdom, shocking a nation struggling to contain a terrorist movement seen as especially dangerous not just because it promotes violence, but also because it has adopted elements of Saudi Arabia’s intolerant version of Islam — a Sunni creed known as Wahhabism — and used them to delegitimize the monarchy.

“Wahhabism is fundamental to the Islamic State’s ideology,” said Cole Bunzel, a scholar of Wahhabi history at Princeton University and the author of a recent paper on Saudi Arabia and the Islamic State. “It informs the character of their religion and is the most on-display feature, in my opinion, of their entire ideology.”

Among 20 terrorist episodes in Saudi Arabia since late 2014, the killing of Sergeant Rashidi was the third in which citizens had secretly joined the Islamic State and killed relatives in the security services. In each case, they justified their acts by saying Saudi Arabia practiced a corrupted version of the faith, a charge aimed at a kingdom that holds itself up as the only true Islamic state.

The Islamic State, like Al Qaeda before it, accuses the Saudi monarchy of corrupting the faith in order to preserve its power. But Qaeda networks in the kingdom were dismantled years ago, and the group’s leadership abroad has discouraged killing Muslim civilians.

The Islamic State, however, has been able to infiltrate the kingdom through digital recruiting, and it has found devotees willing to kill fellow Sunnis, as well as Shiites, to destabilize the monarchy.

In July, a 19-year-old man murdered his uncle, a police colonel, before carrying out a suicide attack near a prison, wounding two guards.

In an audio message released by the Islamic State after his death, he addressed his own mother.

“Your apostate brother was a loyalist to the tyrants,” he said. “Were it not for him, the tyrants would not exist.”

Maj. Gen. Mansour Turki, a spokesman for the Saudi Interior Ministry, said that terrorist attacks over the past two years had killed scores of people, along with about two dozen militants. In addition, about 3,000 Saudis have joined militant groups abroad, and more than 5,000 have been incarcerated at home on terrorism charges, a large increase in recent years.

Saudi Arabia has a tangled history with Islamic militant groups. For a long time, it backed them as proxy forces to push its agenda in places like Bosnia, Chechnya and Afghanistan (where it worked with the United States). But that largely ended in 2003, when Al Qaeda turned its focus on the kingdom and staged a series of deadly attacks.

Now the Islamic State poses a new challenge, by turning aspects of Saudi Arabia’s fundamentalist creed against it. Wahhabism has been molded over the years to serve the interests of the monarchy, emphasizing obedience to the rulers and condemning terrorist attacks, even against those seen as apostates.

Still, among the Islamic State’s many enemies, Saudi Arabia is the only one that considers the Quran and other religious texts its constitution, criminalizes apostasy and bans all forms of unsanctioned public religion.

The country was founded on an alliance between the Saud family, whose members became the monarchs, and a fundamentalist cleric named Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahhab, whose teachings were used to justify military conquest by labeling it jihad against those deemed to be infidels, most of whom were other Muslims.

Sheikh Abdul-Wahhab’s descendants still dominate the religious institutions of the Saudi state, which now play down the violence in the country’s history and emphasize aspects convenient to an all-powerful royal family, like the importance of obeying the leadership.

Saudi officials reject comparisons between their ideology and that of the Islamic State, noting that millions of non-Muslims live in the kingdom and that the government is closely allied with the United States and participates in the American campaign against the militant group. They also say that Saudi Islam does not promote the caliphate, as does the Islamic State, and that senior clerics condemn the terrorist attacks and have branded the group “deviant.”

But critics argue that many Saudi clerics have never renounced the aspects of the Wahhabi tradition that the Islamic State has adopted, especially with regard to Shiites, who make up an estimated 10 percent of the kingdom’s 20 million citizens. Many Saudi clerics consider Shiites heretics and accuse them of loyalty to Saudi Arabia’s regional rival, Iran.

The jihadists have exploited this by repeatedly launching suicide attacks on Shiite mosques and then accusing Saudi clerics of hypocrisy for condemning the violence.

“It is clearly hard for Saudi clerics to condemn outright attacks on Shiites,,” said Mr. Bunzel, the Princeton scholar. “And you get the feeling that they don’t care as much if the Shiites get attacked, since they’re not really Muslims in their view.”

As elsewhere in the world, the Islamic State has relied on social media to reach inside the kingdom, find recruits and dispatch them to attack, often under the noses of their closest relatives.

This has made plots hard to prevent, General Turki said, citing the example of a man arrested last year after killing two police officers in a drive-by shooting near Riyadh. One Islamic State supporter had given him the car, and another had provided the gun, but the attacker never learned their names.

Still, the group had struggled to target the security forces, so it told recruits to kill officers from their own families. General Turki summarized their message as, “You are closer, so no one will know you.”

In September, two men abducted their cousin, a soldier in the Saudi Army, and filmed a video of him bound and begging for mercy in the sand as they pledged allegiance to the Islamic State and shot him dead. The security forces killed one of them and arrested the other.

Photo

A Saudi man recording a video message in the kingdom this month. As with elsewhere in the world, the Islamic State has relied on social media to reach inside Saudi Arabia, find recruits and dispatch them to attack. Credit Sergey Ponomarev for The New York Times

Soon after came the abduction and murder of Sergeant Rashidi by the six cousins, following a process of radicalization that no one in their families noticed.

The ringleader, Wael al-Rashidi, who addressed the camera in the video, had a pharmacy degree and worked in a Riyadh hospital, two of Sergeant Rashidi’s brothers said in an interview. He had smoked cigarettes, a practice shunned by most devout Muslims, and spent hours “hacking” on his computer or playing war games on his Xbox.

One of his two brothers who joined the plot played the oud, also an act religious conservatives frown on.

Three other attackers were university students; two were brothers, and two were roommates, both studying Shariah at a state university in Riyadh.

About two years ago, Wael al-Rashidi became more religious and withdrew from family functions, but that did not raise alarms in a society where religious conservatism is common.

“We all saw that he was growing a beard and going to the mosque, but there are lots of people like that here, so we had no idea he was planning something else,” said Sergeant Rashidi’s foster brother, Mishari.

Even more puzzling was that Wael’s father was a retired officer in the domestic intelligence service, an agency charged with detecting jihadist threats, Sgt. Rashidi’s brothers said. The father of another of the attackers still works for the force.

“Maybe he didn’t know, or he was scared to report him or thought he would straighten out,” said one of Sgt. Rashidi’s brothers, Bandar. “Only he knows.”

While the attackers were not personally close to Sergeant Rashidi, they told him they had a gift from their mother for him to deliver. He met them, and they abducted and killed him a few hours later.

The family’s dread grew in the following days as relatives noticed that their sons were missing and had turned off their phones. Then the Islamic State released the video, confirming the family’s suspicions.

On March 11, Saudi security forces tracked the six men to a remote location and killed them all in a shoot out, local news outlets reported.

Sergeant Rashidi’s brothers are glad the six are dead, but the episode has left them deeply suspicious.

“If anyone calls and says, ‘Where are you? I want to see you,’ you don’t trust him anymore,” Bandar said. “We don’t trust anyone.”

NY Times



9 Comments on "ISIS Turns Saudis Against the Kingdom, and Families Against Their Own"

  1. paulo1 on Fri, 1st Apr 2016 8:39 am 

    re: “It informs the character of their religion and is the most on-display feature, in my opinion, of their entire ideology.”

    Beheadings, mass rapes, sex slaves, ethnic cleansing, mass shootings, suicide bombers,…whatever. Nice display.

    Nice religion you have.

    “If anyone calls and says, ‘Where are you? I want to see you,’ you don’t trust him anymore,” Bandar said. “We don’t trust anyone.”

    Logical outcomes.

    The West needs to vacate the ME, asap. The oil will still go on the market, and if China buys it so what?, another source is freed up in the process. Talk about logical outcomes. Or, as GW says…”They hate us for our freedoms”….yeah, righhhhht. (Maybe thay hate the West because they bomb and overthrow their countries).

  2. onlooker on Fri, 1st Apr 2016 8:59 am 

    yeah, the West created this Monster. They nourished KSA, they provoked the Middle Eastern peoples, they armed rogue governments. Oh yeah so now we cry about the terrorists and their indignation (rightful) . KSA is the ultimate hypocrite. With one voice, they live with all the splendor and affluence of the super wealthy then with another voice they call for the Wahhabism extreme version of Islam. Oh and they sell OIL to the Great Satan – the US. So now Islam has turned on itself beyond just against non Islam. This because we have created a fertile environment for extremism. Extreme poverty, corruption, failed and corrupt states, etc. On top of the already fanaticism and religious divide over there. What do we care as long as we can either take the Oil or have it sold to us.

  3. Davy on Fri, 1st Apr 2016 9:30 am 

    Yea, Paulo, that is the reality at some levels. Oil is an international commodity so it will get to market. Oil players must sell oil to survive. Gone are the days of using oil as a weapon. It is a mutual destructive weapon if used because markets are destroyed by destructive oil demand or supply movements.

    On the other hand if the powers to be including Russia leave the Middle East the crazies will destroy it and destroy our ability to run our global system. Some want BAU dead I prefer a slower transitional approach of some kind. A destroyed ME is a dead global system.

    Best approach is partial withdraw. No major country except small insignificant ones can withdraw from the current global dynamics including the internternational oil markets. A partial withdraw could be done as Russia is doing now. Keep a foot hold and be ready to move back quickly if the situation deteriorates.

    Yet, the reality is the ME is a cash cow for the military industrial complex. That makes it very difficult for rational moves in the ME.

  4. GregT on Fri, 1st Apr 2016 11:30 am 

    “Yet, the reality is the ME is a cash cow for the military industrial complex.”

    For the US MIC, and for the USD as well.

  5. HARM on Fri, 1st Apr 2016 11:58 am 

    So glad the U.S. is supporting and sending a never-ending stream of dollars and military “aid” to this fine “ally” of ours. So civilized, so peaceful.

  6. penury on Fri, 1st Apr 2016 12:00 pm 

    I do believe that the death of the Empire will cause conflicts throughout the world, but I think I read a wise statement on here a few years ago: ” this is not our circus, and those are not our monkeys.” We need to just go home.

  7. Anonymous on Fri, 1st Apr 2016 3:54 pm 

    More shyte from the Jew York Times. All the dis-information that’s fit to print.

  8. Truth Has A Liberal Bias on Fri, 1st Apr 2016 10:03 pm 

    Saudi Arabia Uncovered. Aired a few days ago.

    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/film/saudi-arabia-uncovered/

  9. Kenz300 on Sun, 3rd Apr 2016 7:47 am 

    Preaching hate and intolerance………..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *