Peak Oil is You
Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)
Page added on December 14, 2013
Is War With China Inevitable?
As a general rule, extreme economic decline is almost always followed by extreme international conflict. Sometimes, these disasters can be attributed to the human survival imperative and the desire to accumulate resources during crisis. But most often, war amid fiscal distress is usually a means for the political and financial elite to distract the masses away from their empty wallets and empty stomachs.
War galvanizes societies, usually under false pretenses. I’m not talking about superficial “police actions” or absurd crusades to “spread democracy” to Third World enclaves that don’t want it. No, I’m talking about REAL war: war that threatens the fabric of a culture, war that tumbles violently across people’s doorsteps. The reality of near-total annihilation is what oligarchs use to avoid blame for economic distress while molding nations and populations.
Because of the very predictable correlation between financial catastrophe and military conflagration, it makes quite a bit of sense for Americans today to be concerned. Never before in history has our country been so close to full-spectrum economic collapse, the kind that kills currencies and simultaneously plunges hundreds of millions of people into poverty. It is a collapse that has progressed thanks to the deliberate efforts of international financiers and central banks. It only follows that the mind-boggling scale of the situation would “require” a grand distraction to match.
It is difficult to predict what form this distraction will take and where it will begin, primarily because the elites have so many options. The Mideast is certainly an ever-looming possibility. Iran is a viable catalyst. Syria is not entirely off the table. Saudi Arabia and Israel are now essentially working together, forming a strange alliance that could promise considerable turmoil — even without the aid of the United States. Plenty of Americans still fear the Al Qaeda bogeyman, and a terrorist attack is not hard to fabricate. However, when I look at the shift of economic power and military deployment, the potential danger areas appear to be growing not only in the dry deserts of Syria and Iran, but also in the politically volatile waters of the East China Sea.
China is THE key to any outright implosion of the U.S. monetary system. Other countries, like Saudi Arabia, may play a part; but ultimately it will be China that deals the decisive blow against the dollar’s world reserve status. China’s dollar and Treasury bond holdings could be used as a weapon to trigger a global sell-off of dollar-denominated assets. China has stopped future increases of dollar forex holdings, and has cut the use of the dollar in bilateral trade agreements with multiple countries. Oil-producing nations are shifting alliances to China because it is now the world’s largest consumer of petroleum. And, China has clearly been preparing for this eventuality for years. So, given these circumstances, how can the U.S. government conceive of confrontation with the East? Challenging one’s creditors to a duel does not usually end well. At the very least, it would be economic suicide. But perhaps that is the point. Perhaps America is meant to make this seemingly idiotic leap.
Here are just some of the signs of a buildup to conflict…
Currency Wars And Shooting Wars
In March 2009, U.S. military and intelligence officials gathered to participate in a simulated war game, a hypothetical economic struggle between the United States and China.
The conclusions of the war game were ominous. The participants determined that there was no way for the United States to win in an economic battle with China. The Chinese had a counterstrategy to every U.S. effort and an ace up their sleeve – namely, their U.S. dollar reserves, which they could use as a monetary neutron bomb, a chain reaction that would result in the abandonment of the dollar by exporters around the world . They also found that China has been quietly accumulating hard assets (including land and gold) across globe, using sovereign wealth funds, government-controlled front companies, and private equity funds to make the purchases. China could use these tangible assets as a hedge to protect against the eventual devaluation of its U.S. dollar and Treasury holdings, meaning the losses on its remaining U.S. financial investments was acceptable should it decide to crush the dollar.
The natural response of those skeptical of the war game and its findings is to claim that the American military would be the ultimate trump card and probable response to a Chinese economic threat. Of course, China’s relationship with Russia suggests a possible alliance against such an action and would definitely negate the use of nuclear weapons (unless the elites plan nuclear Armageddon). That said, it is highly likely that the U.S. government would respond with military action to a Chinese dollar dump, not unlike Germany’s rise to militarization and totalitarianism after the hyperinflationary implosion of the mark. The idea that anyone except the internationalists could “win” such a venture, though, is foolish.
I would suggest that this may actually be the plan of globalists in the United States and their counterparts in Asia and Europe. China’s rise to financial prominence is not due to its economic prowess. In fact, China is ripe with poor fiscal judgment calls and infrastructure projects that have gone nowhere. But what China does have on its side are massive capital inflows from global banks and corporations, mainly based in the United States and the European Union. And, it has help in the spread of its currency (the Yuan) from entities like JPMorgan Chase and Co. The International Monetary Fund is seeking to include China in its global basket currency, the SDR, which would give China even more leverage to use in breaking the dollar’s reserve status. Corporate financiers and central bankers have made it more than possible for China to kill the dollar, which they openly suggest is a “good thing.”
Is it possible that the war game scenarios carried out by the Pentagon and elitist think-tanks like the RAND Corporation were not meant to prevent a war with China, but to ensure one takes place?
The Senkaku Islands
Every terrible war has a trigger point, an event that history books later claim “started it all.” For the Spanish-American War, it was the bombing of the USS Maine. For World War I it was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria. For U.S. involvement in World War I, it was the sinking of the Lusitania by a German U-Boat. For U.S. involvement in World War II, it was the attack on Pearl Harbor. For Vietnam, it was the Gulf of Tonkin Incident (I recommend readers look into the hidden history behind all of these events). While the initial outbreak of war always appears to be spontaneous, the reality is that most wars are planned far in advance.
As evidence indicates, China has been deliberately positioned to levy an economic blow against the United States. Our government is fully aware what the results of that attack will be, considering they have gamed the scenario multiple times. And, by RAND Corporation’s own admission, China and the United States have been preparing for physical confrontation for some time, centered on the concept of pre-emptive strikes. Meaning, the response both sides have exclusively trained for in the event of confrontation is to attack the other first!
The seemingly simple and petty dispute over the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea actually provides a perfect environment for the pre-emptive powder keg to explode.
China has recently declared an “air defense zone” that extends over the islands, which Japan has already claimed as its own. China, South Korea and the United States have all moved to defy this defense zone. South Korea has even extended its own air defense zone to overlap China’s.
China has responded with warnings that its military aircraft will now monitor the region and demands that other nations provide it with civilian airline flight paths. China has also stated that it plans to create MORE arbitrary defense zones in the near future.
The U.S. government under Barack Obama has long planned a military shift into the Pacific, which is meant specifically to counter China’s increased presence. It’s almost as if the White House knew a confrontation was coming.
The shift is now accelerating due to the Senkaku situation, as the U.S. transfers submarine-hunting jets to Japan while pledging full support for Japan should war ignite.
And most recently, the Japanese press has suggested that war between the two countries could erupt as early as January.
China, with its limited navy, has focused more of its energy and funding into advanced missile technologies — including “ship killers,” which fly too low and fast to be detected with current radar. This is the same strategy of cheap compact precision warfare being adopted by countries like Syria and Iran, and it is designed specifically to disrupt tradition American military tactics.
Currently, very little diplomatic headway has been made or attempted in regards to the Senkaku Islands. The culmination of various ingredients so far makes for a sour stew.
All that is required now is that one trigger event — that one ironic “twist of fate” that mainstream historians love so much, the spark that lights the fuse. China could suddenly sell a mass quantity of U.S. Treasuries, perhaps in response to the renewed debt debate next spring. The United States could use pre-emption to take down a Chinese military plane or submarine. A random missile could destroy a passenger airliner traveling through the defense zone, and both sides could blame each other. The point is nothing good could come from the escalation over Senkaku.
Why Is War Useful?
What could possibly be gained by fomenting a war between the United States and China? What could possibly be gained by throwing America’s economy, the supposed “goose that lays the golden eggs”, to the fiscal wolves? As stated earlier, distraction is paramount, and fear is valuable political and social capital.
Global financiers created the circumstances that have led to America’s probable economic demise, but they don’t want to be blamed for it. War provides the perfect cover for monetary collapse, and a war with China might become the cover to end all covers. The resulting fiscal damage and the terror Americans would face could be overwhelming. Activists who question the legitimacy of the U.S. government and its actions, once considered champions of free speech, could easily be labeled “treasonous” during wartime by authorities and the frightened masses. (If the government is willing to use the Internal Revenue Service against us today, just think about who it will send after us during the chaos of a losing war tomorrow.) A lockdown of civil liberties could be instituted behind the fog of this national panic.
Primarily, war tends to influence the masses to agree to more centralization, to relinquish their rights in the name of the “greater good”, and to accept less transparency in government and more power in the hands of fewer people. Most important, though, is war’s usefulness as a philosophical manipulation after the dust has settled.
After nearly every war of the 20th and 21st century, the subsequent propaganda implies one message in particular: National sovereignty, or nationalism, is the cause of all our problems. The establishment then claims that there is only one solution that will solve these problems: globalization. This article by Andrew Hunter, the chairman of the Australian Fabian Society, is exactly the kind of narrative I expect to hear if conflict arises between the United States and China.
National identity and sovereignty are the scapegoats, and the Fabians (globalist propagandists) are quick to point a finger. Their assertion is that nation states should no longer exist, borders should be erased and a one-world economic system and government should be founded. Only then will war and financial strife end. Who will be in charge of this interdependent one world utopia? I’ll give you three guesses…
The Fabians, of course, make no mention of global bankers and their instigation of nearly every war and depression for the past 100 years; and these are invariably the same people that will end up in positions of authority if globalization comes to fruition. What the majority of people do not yet understand is that globalists have no loyalties to any particular country, and they are perfectly willing to sacrifice governments, economies, even entire cultures, in the pursuit of their “ideal society”. “Order out of chaos” is their motto, after all. The bottom line is that a war between China and the United States will not be caused by national sovereignty. Rather, it will be caused by elitists looking for a way to END national sovereignty. That’s why such a hypothetical conflict, a conflict that has been gamed by think tanks for years, is likely to be forced into reality.
14 Comments on "Is War With China Inevitable?"
eugene on Sat, 14th Dec 2013 11:24 pm
If the US stops being such an ass, war is not inevitable. The way it is the masses of Americans will stand on the sidelines cheering war on while sending their soldiers to a senseless conflict. If there is the slightest opportunity to walk on others, to participate in genocide through proxy wars and to stomp on the rights of others, the US will do so. We have been an aggressive, brutal people from the get go. While it is great fun to blame the elites, etc, it takes a mindless public to make it all work. A mindless public that is willing to believe any propaganda the government with the cooperation of a purchased media is willing to spout. In the end, we all play the game.
BillT on Sun, 15th Dec 2013 12:11 am
eugene, I doubt anyone would be cheering a war with China. They would be too concerned about eating and keeping warm, not to mention the police state they would be living in. There is no guarantee the the bombs/missiles would not rain down on American cities this time. Nor is there a guarantee that Russia would wait on the sidelines. Eventually, the nukes would fly and …
BillT on Sun, 15th Dec 2013 12:14 am
As for the “mindless public”, eugene, I’m afraid you are correct. Most don’t know or want to know what is really going on and that their ‘American Dream’ has turned into a nightmare. But the 2X4 of reality is about to hit them square between the eyes.
dave on Sun, 15th Dec 2013 1:51 am
And here we are pumping countless dollars into the Middle East with the consequence of our exploding national debt. Let’s not forget the political capital we’re squandering the world over. It may be already past time to look East and contemplate a large and growing national threat.
Arthur on Sun, 15th Dec 2013 1:55 pm
Nobody wants war with America. There are no Russian, Chinese or European carriers cruising before either the right of left coast of the US (there aren’t hardly any of these carriers in the first place). If war is going to happen, it will be a war of choice originated in or provoked by Washington and starting before the Chinese coast.
extreme economic decline is almost always followed by extreme international conflict.
Best example in recent history: the Argentinian regime under dictator general Galtieri in 1982 was with the back against the wall and the only (temporary) way out was the flight forward into war against Britain over the Falklands:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Events_leading_to_the_Falklands_War
The Argentinian population predictably rallied around the flag and the junta was relieved from their internal problems.
The only real interesting thing to learn from that conflict was that by 1982 navies had become superfluous, anachronistic and useless against a real enemy with supersonic missiles, like the Chinese and Russian. If the Argentinians had succeeded in obtaining another 10 French made Exocet rockets, as they desperately tried to do, they would have won. Meanwhile 30 years have passed and the missile technology has been perfected, where the good old navy still consists of expensive sitting ducks. An important fact to keep in mind if things go terribly wrong in the Chinese Sea.
Every terrible war has a trigger point, an event that history books later claim “started it all.” For the Spanish-American War, it was the bombing of the USS Maine. For World War I it was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria. For U.S. involvement in World War I, it was the sinking of the Lusitania by a German U-Boat. For U.S. involvement in World War II, it was the attack on Pearl Harbor. For Vietnam, it was the Gulf of Tonkin Incident (I recommend readers look into the hidden history behind all of these events). While the initial outbreak of war always appears to be spontaneous, the reality is that most wars are planned far in advance.
Bingo, 100% correct! Accidental wars do not exist. The truth behind every war can be found in the diaries of the decision makers at the time and in the archives, to be sealed for at least 50 years (British WW2 archives are said to be opened in 2017, embrace yourself for some real fireworks).
The bottom line is that a war between China and the United States will not be caused by national sovereignty. Rather, it will be caused by elitists looking for a way to END national sovereignty.
Correct, but it should be added that the globalists are on the US side only, NOT the Chinese side. As far as we know China does not have a globalist agenda. It could be attacked BECAUSE it does resist globalism, just like post-Soviet Russia. The coalition between the US and USSR came about long before the official date of June 22, 1941, when the Germans desperately attempted the flight forward in response to the massive Soviet military build-up near the Russian-German border. The USSR was a suitable ally of Roosevelt America because the USSR had the same aims as Roosevelt: world government. Roosevelt’s hope always had been that the USSR eventually would go along with the ‘Fabian socialist agenda’, as mentioned in the article above. That was a miscalculation. The most important representative of that strain of communism, Wallstreet-backed Leon Trotsky, was ice-picked in August 1940 by Stalin’s agents. But by that time the war already was in full swing and still useful of bringing the US into planetary pole position, with the USSR in 2nd place. It was precisely the refusal of closet antisemite Stalin and his ‘mr Njet’ foreign minister Gromyko to go along with United Nations based fabian socialism after 1945 that lead to the estrangement between Washington and Moscow. And besides, Roosevelt dropped dead not one minute too early and a reaction in the US took place from 1950-1965 (McCarthy and Kennedy clan), until with LBJ the same ‘1933-1945 people’ were in the saddle again, until today (with a minute Nixon hick-up in between). Opposition like Ron Paul pales in comparison to the Kennedy’s, with behind the scenes father Joseph being more important than JFK.
That’s why such a hypothetical conflict, a conflict that has been gamed by think tanks for years, is likely to be forced into reality.
That is true, but I have a feeling that present day aging America cannot be warmed that easily for a world war and that Washington could risk the integrity of their tax farm. Besides, one of the essential ingredients of the power base of the ‘Fabians’ always has been media ownership, now sidelined by the internet and social media, like this forum. And there is absolutely no way Europe can be persuaded in fighting a world war, just because of a (staged) incident in the South China Sea. Russia on the other hand can be expected to fight on the side of China, sooner or later. As well as Iran. And possibly even Turkey, with one of the largest armies in the world.
mike on Sun, 15th Dec 2013 3:14 pm
I thought this was a peak oil site. That is why originally I visited it. But I am now privileged to be educated into the alternative revisionist history of the twentieth century by Arthur. I have learned that the Holocaust was an Anglo conspiracy. Nuremberg too. The USA is Jew dominated. Operation Barbarossa was a desperate attempt tpo defend European civilsation against the onslaught of the Soviets. The Americans and Brits arranged the death of AnnFrank. Pearl Harbor was engineered by (the Jew) FDR. Anything else, Arthur? The Archduke was actually assassinated by agents on the orders of Woodrow Wilson and Asquith? Prince Rudolf was murdered by British agents at Mayerling? Oradour was bombed by the USAAF, not flattened by the SS? Only czeck terrorists died at Lidice? Obama is a reptilian, and the USAF is spreading hallucinogenic chamicals in chem trails around the globe to keep the masses docile………
Arthur, your only interest in peak oil is to be able to gloat over the imagined impending decline of the USA when the oil runs out, andf the triumph of (Aryan) Europe.
Frank Kling on Sun, 15th Dec 2013 5:27 pm
Thank you again, Arthur, for a fascinating education in history- brilliant indeed.
GregT on Sun, 15th Dec 2013 6:39 pm
Yes, Arthur has indeed done his homework.
Arthur on Sun, 15th Dec 2013 6:43 pm
I thought this was a peak oil site. That is why originally I visited it. But I am now privileged to be educated into the alternative revisionist history of the twentieth century by Arthur.
Your idea is wrong then, just study the title of this article, has nothing to do with oil. Sites strictly concentrating on oil barrel counting, like TOD, set themselves up for demise. The subtle hint towards a ban is noted.
I have learned that the Holocaust was an Anglo conspiracy. Nuremberg too. The USA is Jew dominated. Operation Barbarossa was a desperate attempt tpo defend European civilsation against the onslaught of the Soviets. The Americans and Brits arranged the death of AnnFrank. Pearl Harbor was engineered by (the Jew) FDR. Anything else, Arthur?
Not bad, you seem to be a fast learner, so I keep my hopes high for you, carry on, you are doing fine.
The Archduke was actually assassinated by agents on the orders of Woodrow Wilson and Asquith? Prince Rudolf was murdered by British agents at Mayerling? Oradour was bombed by the USAAF, not flattened by the SS? Only czeck terrorists died at Lidice? Obama is a reptilian, and the USAF is spreading hallucinogenic chamicals in chem trails around the globe to keep the masses docile………
I have zero opinions on the topics referred in this quote. What is a ‘reptilian’? I thought Obama was a (half) Kenyan, not a reptilian.
Arthur, your only interest in peak oil is to be able to gloat over the imagined impending decline of the USA when the oil runs out, andf the triumph of (Aryan) Europe.
BS, I run a blog that costed me with hundreds of hours spent on energy matters. I was educated on a university level in matters concerning energy, mainly because I was deeply impressed by the report of the Club of Rome and the implications for the world. But yes, I do have other interests than energy and in all honesty do not care that much if the ‘commoners’ (and that includes me) will drive in a car or not in ten years time. Not sure what you mean with ‘triumph of Aryan Europe’… I would be glad if Europe survives as a recognizable European civilization among other, different civilizations in a multi-polar world. My opinion is rather mainstream really, the EU is now hermetically sealed-off and Merkel, Sarkozy and even Cameron have all stated that multiculturalism has failed. Amen. Germany is actively trying to draw the Ukraine into Europe, read working towards Greater Europe in the spirit of the conservative general de Gaulle. Turkey is turning away from Europe, thank God. What more can Arthur the Revisionist want? Yes, these are admittedly rough times for commies like you. This is definitely not going to be your century. Soms zit het mee, soms zit het tegen. 😉
Frank, thanks for the support. Not that I need it on a personal level, but it comes in handy as a means against… how shall I put it… being pushed into ‘isolationism’.
mike on Sun, 15th Dec 2013 8:51 pm
“these are admittedly rough times for commies like you. This is definitely not going to be your century. Soms zit het mee, soms zit het tegen” Maar daar zit ik niet echt mee in…..Wide of the target, Athur. I ain’t a commie. Never have been. Just revolted by your anti semitic drivel and parading of pseudo intellectual credentials. And bored by your paranoid fantasy version of Mein Kampf history – just as the evil Anglo Americans destroyed Germany in 1918 according to Uncle Adolf, so you imagine thyey did likewise in 1945. What puzzles me is this: small country near sea level that has most to lose from the melting of the ice caps, yet you are a global warming denialist. And small country that suffered proportionately more casualties from Nazi occupation than any other in Europe; yet you are a gatlikker denialist of Nazi crimes. Like I said elsewhere, had it not been for Canadian and British troops in 1944 and 1945, you would still be eating tulip bulbs for dinner.
Arthur on Mon, 16th Dec 2013 12:00 am
Here is something fascinating for you… they are now openly discussing on Russian TV, the possibility that perhaps the Russians were indeed plotting for an attack on Europe:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VD11igF7seE
(with English subs)
The story is still far from the truth, namely that in truth the Germans never planned an ‘Lebensraum attack’ after 1933, but at least it is a start to end up with the real truth.
For the real truth about Barbarossa, see this letter from the commander of the Wehrmacht to his foreign minister von Ribbentrop:
Der Chef des Oberkommandos der Wehrmacht F. H. Qu., d. 11. Mai 1941
WFST / Abt. L (I Op)
Nr. 00 886/41 g.Kdos.
Geheime Kommandosache
An den Herrn Reichsminister des Aeußern
Sehr verehrter Herr Reichsminister
Das Oberkommando der Wehrmacht beobachtet seit Monaten mit ständig wachsender Besorgnis die Entwicklung, die der Aufmarsch russischer Streitkräfte entlang der deutschen Ostgrenze nimmt.
Nach den hier vorliegenden Meldungen befänden sich bei Kriegsausbruch 1939 etwa 77 russische Schützen-Divisionen im europäischen Rußland, davon nur wenig mehr als die Hälfte im west-russischen Grenzraum. Nach Beendigung des Polenfeldzuges erhöhte sich diese Zahl auf 114. Wenn das Oberkommando der Wehrmacht damals eine gewisse Begründung dieser Maßnahmen in der allerdings fast kampflosen Besetzung Ost-Polens durch russische Truppen sah, so mußte es nach planmäßigem Abschluß dieser Operationen mit um so größerem Befremden ein noch weiteres Anwachsen dieser Zahl auf 121 feststellen.
Seit Beginn dieses Jahres aber liefen fast täglich beim Oberkommando der Wehrmacht von allen Teilen der Grenze Meldungen ein, die in ihrer Gesamtauswertung das Bild einer umfassenden russischen Truppenkonzentration an der deutschen Ostgrenze ergaben. Unter rücksichtslosem Abtransport von Schützen, rnot.- und Pz.-Divisionen aus dem asiatischen Raum und Kaukasien — besonders nach dem russisch-japanischen Nichtangriffspakt — erhöhte sich die Zahl allein der festgestellten Schützen-Divisionen im europäischen Rußland am 1. 5. 1941 auf 143. Davon befanden sich 119 Divisionen im deutschrussischen Grenzraum.
Bei den Pz.-Brigaden und Pz.-Divisionen ist diese wachsende Schwerpunktbildung noch erheblich ausgesprochener. Seit Jahresbeginn befinden sich fast sämtliche überhaupt festgestellten mot.- und Pz.-Einheiten in West-Rußland. Hinzu kommen weitere 20 Kav.-Divisionen und mehrere Fallschirm-Bataillone.
Eine gleiche Entwicklung ist auch bei der russischen Luftwaffe zu erkennen. Mit der ständig zunehmenden Anhäufung leichter Fliegerverbände zur Unterstützung des Heeres läßt der rasche Fortgang des Ausbaues der Bodenorganisationen in Grenznähe die Vorbereitung weitreichender Bombenangriffe starker Kampffliegereinheiten in das Deutsche Reich hinein erkennen.
Weiterhin weist das Oberkommando der Wehrmacht erneut auf die wiederholten Aeußerungen höherer sowjetrussischer Offiziere hin, die bei Planspielen und Truppenübungen offen von einer baldigen russischen Offensive sprachen.
Das Oberkommando der Wehrmacht ist durch diese Tatsachen in Verbindung mit den dem Auswärtigen Amt laufend mitgeteilten Grenzverletzungen sowjetrussischer Flugzeuge und Soldaten zu der Ueberzeugung gekommen, daß dieses, einer Mobilmachung praktisch gleichkommende Ausmaß des russischen Aufmarsches an der deutschen Ostgrenze, nur noch als Vorbereitung für russische Offensivmaßnahmen größten Umfanges gedeutet werden kann. Die Gefahr eines bewaffneten Konfliktes rückt daher in bedrohliche Nähe.
Der annähernd abgeschlossene Aufmarsch ihrer Wehrmacht ermöglicht der sowjetrussischen Staatsführung dabei die freie Wahl des Angriffsbeginns. Entsprechende deutsche Gegenmaßnahmen werden nunmehr unumgänglich.
Heil Hitler!
Ihr sehr ergebener
gez. Keitel
Copy and paste this letter into google translate to verify that 6 weeks before the start of the biggest military operation in world history, the German leaders were not plotting a raid on the USSR at all, but saw with great anxiety how the biggest bunch of mass murderers in world history were concentrating enormous numbers of troops and equipment near the German border to launch an attack against Europe, all the way to the Atlantic, including Holland. Most equipment was manufactured with US aid, first and foremost the Jew Armand Hammer, who with full knowledge of Roosevelt was responsible for at least 50% of the armament buildup in the USSR. Millions of Ukrainians were passively murdered (Holomodor, now here is a holocaust that actually DID happen) on orders of the butcher of the Ukraine, the Jew Lazar Kaganovic…
en . wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazar_Kaganovich
… by depriving them of their own agricultural produce in order to pay for the military buildup against Europe.
This information plus the failure of Rudolf Hess and his dramatic flight to Britain in yet another desperate attempt to make peace around the same time, prompted the Germans to the last-minute conclusion that they were set up for destruction anyway and that the only possibility to attempt to survive was to hit the first blow and attempt to reach Moscow and dissolve the Evil Empire USSR. The Soviets had 34,000 tanks, the Germans only ca. 4,000. The Germans were terribly bad prepared for fighting in the Russian winter… because they never planned a war against of aggression against the USSR.
Here is a report by Hans-Ulrich Rudel, a famous German pilot ace (see wikipedia) describing what he saw during the first days of the war:
While flying over these numerous airbases and fortifications, We all had the same thought in our heads—how lucky we were to have struck first. It seemed that the Soviets were feverishly readying the groundwork for an attack against us… The highway [From] Smolensk [to] Moscow was the target of many raids; it was packed with huge amounts of Russian military equipment and supplies. Trucks and tanks were lined up one after another almost without any intervals, often in three parallel columns. If all this massive machinery had attacked us…. There were no difficulties in attacking so enticing a target. In a few clays, the entire road was transformed into piles of rubble.
The only reason why Holland did not suffer the same fate as Poland and other Eastern European countries was because of the heroic self-sacrifice of the Germans. But you are too stupid to understand that, brainwashed as you are by all these Spielberg movies you saw without critical thinking.
We don’t need to wait for the allied archives to open up, because one archive already started to leak, the Finnish archives. Here is the full truth about WW2:
juliusmilaitis . blogspot . nl/2011/05/finland-in-eye-of-storm-erkki.html
At least you now know what is coming. But hey mike, every revolution needs a few useful idiots who do not understand the signs of the times and whose heads as a consequence will role. That’s were you come in. Don’t say you weren’t warned.
Bor on Mon, 16th Dec 2013 12:04 am
My God,
So many new PhDs in history has been written here! How nice!
Lunacy!
Arthur is from Mars. He has his very own and very special vision of the 20th Century history! And, of course, he was in Kremlin. And in the White House.
This Blog needs such people as Artur as a venereal disease.
GregT on Mon, 16th Dec 2013 2:06 am
As one saying goes, ‘Truth is stranger than fiction.’
And another, ‘The first thing to be lost in war, is the truth.’
And yet one more, ‘History is written by the victors.’
Don’t believe everything that you were taught in school. It is sometimes called indoctrination, or even propaganda.
As I have said before, Arthur has done his homework. There are mountains of books, and documents, to back his account up.
Arthur on Mon, 16th Dec 2013 12:59 pm
This Blog needs such people as Artur as a venereal disease.
From Bor’s short contribution two conclusions can be deducted:
1) Bor does not like one bit what I have written (for extremely good reasons)
2) Bor has no arguments against them.
Bor is not a stupid guy, in fact Bor is from a group that never lacked IQ points. You could even say that their excess of IQ points is our problem, because these IQ points are predictably not going to be used in our interest. But Bor recognizes a defeat when he sees one and does not bite, because he knows that a debate is not in his interest… since he is forced to defend the weaker arguments.
So many new PhDs in history has been written here!
Yes, but the real information is hidden in the allied archives and Steven Spielberg is not a real source.
The British meanwhile, seeing that the date of 2017 is rapidly approaching, are getting very nervous and apply the tactic of releasing real information bit by bit. Here they reluctantly start to admit that they murdered Rudolf Hess in Spandau, 1987.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2414991/Nazi-Rudolf-Hess-murdered-British-agents-prison-stop-revealing-war-secrets-Scotland-Yard-told-NOT-investigate.html
Why did they do that? Because a man of exceptional goodwill, leader of the dying Soviet empire Mikhail Gorbachev, had proposed to release him, which caused all the alarm bells to go off in London and Washington.
Why needed Hess to be killed? Because he would have confirmed the stories above and that could not be allowed to happen.
But hey, no esoteric hidden material necessary. Why not use the material the Alllies have written themselves and were careless enough to put it on the internet, because they thought nobody would bother to actually read their stuff, not even Bor’s PhD’s!
Here, straight from the minutes of the NMT Nuremberg showtrial, describing a little get-together of the victorious alllies, discussing the strategy to be applied to the impending showtrial:
avalon . law.yale.edu/imt/jack37.asp
MR. JUSTICE JACKSON. I really think that this trial, if it should get into an argument over the political and economic causes of this war, could do infinite harm, both in Europe, which I don’t know well, and in America, which I know fairly well. If we should have a prolonged controversy over whether Germany invaded Norway a few jumps ahead of a British invasion of Norway, or whether France in declaring war was the real aggressor, this trial can do infinite harm for those countries with the people of the United States. And the same is true of our Russian relationships. The Germans will certainly accuse all three of our European Allies of adopting policies which forced them to war. The reason I Say that is that captured documents which we have always made that claim-that Germany would be forced into war. They admit they were planning war, but the captured documents of the Foreign Office that I have examined all come down to the claim, “We have no way out; we must fight; we are encircled; we are being strangled to death.”
Some idiot overlooked this damning piece of text and put it in the NMT minutes regardless. The f***ers running this trial knew the truth all too well, but were all too keen to consolidate their gains and engage in constructing a bleak as possible picture of the vanquished nation Germany in order to mask their own, far bigger crimes. During the NMT not a single document could be produced showing that the war against Poland or even Russia had been planned all along.
More proof that Russia is actually working towards an alliance with Germany & Europe is this:
telegraph . co . uk / news/worldnews/europe/russia/5445161/Russia-accuses-Poland-of-starting-Second-World-War.html
I have these recurring visions of the international news media announcing a ‘breaking live event’, not knowing what about, straight from the Kremlin. The cameras will show a long table, with Putin in the middle, next to him Angela Merkel, on the right edge of the table Pat Buchanan from the US and David Irving from the UK and Robert Faurisson from France and on the left two prominent historians from the Russian Academy of Science. Putin will make introductory remarks after which the historians will go into detail and reveal the entire truth about WW2. Angela Merkel in tears. This is not as far-fetched as it seems. After all, Putin recently revealed this bomb shell, predictably totally ignored by the MSM:
haaretz . com / jewish-world/jewish-world-news/1.530857
You see Bor, your time has come. The 20th century, essentially the Jewish century, that century is over. Europe is back and China is rising. All we need to do is prevent WW3.