Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on November 11, 2013

Bookmark and Share

Iran Nuclear Programme Deal Fails Due To French Block: New Saudi-French Alliance Emerging?

While most pragmatists knew well in advance that optimism over an Iran nuclear programme deal emerging out of Geneva was very much displaced, few anticipated what the actual reason for the failure would be. Indeed, most had expected that the staunchest opponent to the deal, Israel PM Netanyahu who moments ago appeared on Face the Nation and made his case (saying Iran would have given up “almost nothing”) would have used his influence over the US as a key member of the 5+1 group of nations (US, Russia, China, France, Britain and Iran) to block any Iranian detente with the US, even though none other than John Kerry has been urging for the Iranian deal for weeks. So when news hit that it was France who had scuttled a deal with a last minute block, many were surprised.

FT reports:

“There was a possibility to reach an agreement with the majority of 5+1 but there was a need to have the consent of all and as you have heard . . . one of the delegations had some problems,” Mohammad Javad Zarif said in a Facebook post referring to the six nations involved in the talks – the US, Russia, China, France, Britain and Iran. Three days of intense negotiations in Geneva, which went into early Sunday morning, failed to produce an interim agreement over Iran’s nuclear programme despite earlier optimistic predictions.

 

France appeared to be concerned that the proposal, which involved Tehran halting key parts of its nuclear programme in return for modest relief from tough international sanctions, did not apply the brakes hard enough on the country’s agenda.

 

Iran’s negotiating team was blessed last week with the strong support of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader and ultimate decision maker, who urged hardliners not to weaken the diplomatic team during nuclear talks and said they were “children of the revolution”.

 

But the top leader’s official Twitter account on Sunday reposted his comments from a speech earlier this year in which he had condemned France’s alleged enmity toward Iran. “The officials of French government in recent years have shown explicit hostility toward the Iranian nation. This is a thoughtless and imprudent move,” the tweet said.

This means that once again the traditional narrative of Iran as an intransigent, obstinate negotiator falls apart, even if there had been an ulterior motive: the removal of Western sanctions against the improverished nation. So it will be up to the west to come up with yet another provocation that makes Iran seem like an irrational actor on the international arena.

However, a bigger questions arises: why did France break away from the US-led negotiating axis, just to side not only with Israel but with Saudi Arabia.

Many ordinary Iranians, including the reform-minded public and those educated in the west, expressed outrage at France and accused it of trying to appease Israel and Saudi Arabia, which have been against any nuclear deal that would give Iran the right to enrich uranium.

 

“French cars occupy Tehran’s streets but instead France stabs Iran in the back,” said Mina, a 32-year-old businesswoman.

 

France’s alliance with Saudi Arabia against Iran is nothing new and we had seen it during the Iran-Iraq war [1980-88] when the Saudis paid France to give fighter bombers and missiles to Saddam [Hussein] to kill us,” said Narges, a university student of politics.

 

“We should boycott French fries and baguettes in a symbolic move,” said Mahdi, an electric engineer.

 

Even Iran’s hardliners who are in principle against any deal attacked France. Fars news agency, close to the elite Revolutionary Guards, ran a headline: “Tough negotiations in Geneva and a French gun-wielding frog.”

Which should at least partially answer the nagging question about who it is that Saudi Arabia has picked to fill the diplomatic void in the aftermath of the deterioration in relations between the oil-rich nation and the US.

Then again, a Saudi Arabia alligned with a France, which by implication is now operating against US interests should result in some truly comic events in the international diplomacy arena very soon. We can’t wait to find out just how Hollande’s socialist government proceeds to entertain the world with its foreign policy foibles.

Finally, for those who missed it, here is Netanyahu earlier today saying “no deal is better than a bad deal.”

zerohedge



8 Comments on "Iran Nuclear Programme Deal Fails Due To French Block: New Saudi-French Alliance Emerging?"

  1. BillT on Mon, 11th Nov 2013 9:38 am 

    With Pakistan selling nukes to the Saudis, we are getting closer and closer to that nuclear war I keep talking about.

  2. Arthur on Mon, 11th Nov 2013 9:42 am 

    Zerohedge is a one man operation and ‘Tyler Durden’ is a nick for Daniel Ivandjiiski, a Bulgarian Jew with a criminal record. Ivandjiiski tries to portray the brake-down of the Geneva talks as the result of an emerging ‘French-Saudi alliance’ and an alleged French wish to make some money from buying weapons to SA.

    BS. The truth is here:

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/10/iran-anger-france-geneva-nuclear-deal

    Caption under a picture of Laurent Fabius, the ‘French’ foreign minister, responsible for the break-down:

    France’s foreign minister, Laurent Fabius, was accused by Iran’s ultra-conservative media of being a ‘servant’ of Israel

    And that is precisely what happened. Fabius and fellow tribesmen John Kohn from State are quietly working towards plunging the world into another world war, a limited nuclear war, that should prove the inevitability of a world government, obviously run by the likes of Fabius and Kohn.

  3. Arthur on Mon, 11th Nov 2013 9:46 am 

    ‘buying’ should be ‘selling’ and ‘tribesmen’ should be ‘tribesman’.

    My apologies.

  4. J-Gav on Mon, 11th Nov 2013 10:13 am 

    There are several link-ups in Middle East policy at work here but my feeling is that you are correct, Arthur, when you note that it has more to do with Israël than it does with Saudi Arabia.

    As for “the inevitability of a world government,” we’ll see, but that would require a level of international coordination which I’m not sure exists. I see things ‘flying apart’ more than ‘coming together’ in the not-too-distant future.

  5. Arthur on Mon, 11th Nov 2013 11:08 am 

    There is a clear alternative for the NWO run by AIPAC/Fed/Wallstreet/The Mile: a multipolar world order, dominated by a bipolarity of a Greater European alliance (EU, Russia, US) and China. And just in case Americans would protest against the name ‘Greater European’, we could use the term ‘The North’ or ‘northern’ and make the Russians happy as well. I would agree with the idea that in the long run the proliferation of nuclear weapons can not be tolerated and that some system of international order is inevitable. The world of the 21st century is going to be dominated by the North and China. They should sit together and agree that no other party can have nuclear weapons (notably Pakistan, Israel, South-Africa, Brasil and Iran) or otherwise get strangled by economic sanctions. Or worse.

  6. Ron Patterson on Mon, 11th Nov 2013 12:50 pm 

    It was not just the French that blocked any agreement it was everyone including the USA.

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/11/iran-nuclear-deal-john-kerry
    “Earlier reports said the talks fell apart because France refused to accept the proposed deal. Kerry said the major powers reached an agreement but Iran was not able to accept the deal “at that particular moment”.”

    The deal that Iran wanted was a really bad deal. Not enough space here to explain it all but it had Iran giving up almost nothing. They kept the ability to build a bomb. John Kerry said earlier, “No deal is better than a bad deal.”

  7. J-Gav on Mon, 11th Nov 2013 6:14 pm 

    Ron – I thought it was Netanyahu who said: “No deal is better than a bad deal.”
    Which makes sense at first blush, but then why aren’t Israël’s numerous warheads (and the ballistic capability to project them) part of the discussion?

  8. Arthur on Mon, 11th Nov 2013 9:03 pm 

    The French and Americans are playing a cynical game here. In my view France is secretly cooperating with the Americans and taking the blame for the failure of the negotiations. Kerry should be mad at the French, but he is not:

    http://antiwar.com/blog/2013/11/11/why-did-france-torpedo-the-iran-negotiations/

    To add an even stranger mix to all this, Secretary Kerry has refused to criticize France and even claimed the failure to get a deal on Friday was Iran’s fault, a narrative that runs contrary to every other story leaked out of the meetings.

    Since the departure of Chirac, France has left the traditional eurocentric Gaullist line and has become one of the staunchest American satraps in Europe, even more than the British at the time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *