Page added on March 5, 2013
U.S. Vice President Joe Biden said there remains “time and space” for diplomacy to avert military action to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear weapons power.
Still, the pressure on President Barack Obama’s administration to move toward military action is growing as Iran advances its uranium enrichment capabilities, and U.S. lawmakers, Israel and Persian Gulf allies press for results.
Iran is using negotiations to “buy time” to pursue a nuclear weapons program, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said yesterday in a video address to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s annual conference in Washington. Although Iran’s uranium enrichment activities have yet to cross Israel’s “red line,” the Islamic Republic is “getting closer” to the point where it would be capable of quickly producing a nuclear weapon, he said.
U.S. Senator John McCain, an Arizona Republican, told the group, a major pro-Israel lobby, that diplomatic efforts with Iran “have failed, and it is very clear that they are on the path of having a nuclear weapon.”
Separately, Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal, following a meeting in Riyadh with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, said yesterday that negotiations with Iran should have a time limit because the Iranians “have not proved to anybody that they are sincere” in their talks.
Biden, who addressed some 13,000 people at the Aipac conference shortly before Netanyahu spoke, said that Obama “is not bluffing” when he says he will prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon. “We are looking to and ready to negotiate peacefully, but all options, including military force, are on the table,” Biden said.
Real Attempt
For now, it’s important to show that the U.S. and its partners have made a real attempt to settle the issue peacefully, he said.
“If, God forbid, the need to act occurs, it is critically important for the whole world to know we did everything in our power, we did everything that reasonably could have been expected, to avoid any confrontation,” Biden said. “And that matters because, God forbid, if we have to act, it’s important that the rest of the world is with us.”
The Pentagon is pursuing “serious contingency planning” – – along with the administration’s strategy of “tough-minded” and “crippling” sanctions — “with the objective of preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon,” Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said in written answers to the Senate Armed Services Committee obtained yesterday by Bloomberg News.
Oil Prices
Iran was the No. 6 producer in the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries in February, and any rise in tensions would hit oil markets. Oil prices have declined in the past month, with West Texas Intermediate crude for April delivery sliding 56 cents, or 0.6 percent, to $90.12 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange, the lowest settlement since Dec. 24.
The U.S. and its negotiating partners — France, the U.K., Russia, China and Germany — presented a new offer to Iran last week at talks in Kazakhstan. If Iran agrees to cease its output of 20 percent enriched uranium, the group would ease restrictions on Iran’s exports of petrochemical products and some additional items, Russia’s chief negotiator and Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said in an interview.
Negotiations are slated to continue on a technical level in Istanbul and then resume in Almaty on April 5, when world powers will be looking for a clear response from Iran. “The ball remains in the Iranian court,” European Union foreign affairs spokesman Michael Mann told reporters in Brussels yesterday.
Uranium Enrichment
In the meantime, though, Iran announced that it’s moving ahead with plans to install 3,000 new-generation centrifuges at its Natanz uranium-enrichment facility. Iran asserts its atomic program is for civilian energy and medical uses, and the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency says it hasn’t detected any diversion of enriched uranium for possible military use.
The head of the IAEA, Yukiya Amano, publicly urged Iran yesterday to allow inspectors to visit the Parchin military site in response to intelligence that Iran had secretly operated a blast chamber there for testing nuclear-weapons components. Iran has cleaned up the site about 20 kilometers (12 miles) southeast of Tehran while preventing IAEA inspectors from visiting, saying it’s not covered by inspection requirements.
“Diplomacy has not worked,” Netanyahu said, speaking via satellite from Israel. Iran is “running out the clock. It has used negotiations, including the most recent ones, in order to buy time to press ahead with its nuclear program.”
‘Red Line’
Netanyahu said Iran hasn’t yet crossed the “red line” that he laid out in a speech at the United Nations last September, meaning the Islamic Republic hasn’t stockpiled enough medium-enriched uranium to fuel a nuclear weapon if further enriched.
“We have to stop its nuclear enrichment program before it’s too late,” the Israeli leader added.
Netanyahu’s remarks indicated that his timeline for possible military action is shorter than Obama’s. The prime minister “made clear that the gaps between his position on Iran and President Obama’s remain considerable,” Shimon Stein, a research fellow at Tel Aviv University’s Institute for National Security Studies, said in a telephone interview.
Last week, 15 U.S. senators co-sponsored a non-binding resolution by Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina that cites concern about Iran’s nuclear activities and expresses support if “Israel is compelled to take military action in self-defense.” Today, some of the Aipac conference attendees will lobby their representatives on Capitol Hill.
Saudi Criticism
In public remarks yesterday in Riyadh with Kerry, the Saudi foreign minister criticized Iran for continuing negotiations “to ask for more negotiation in the future.”
“They reach common understanding only on issues that require further negotiation,” said Prince Saud, whose Arab, Sunni Islamic country is the U.S.’s most important Gulf ally and a nation historically hostile to Persian Shiite Iran.
Kerry repeated the U.S. priority on negotiations to stop Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, while cautioning that “talks will not go on for the sake of talks.”
6 Comments on "Clock Runs as Obama Faces Pressure for Strike on Iran"
Stephen on Tue, 5th Mar 2013 2:48 pm
I don’t think that we have the money to afford another war here. The sequester is already seriously cutting our military expenses. I suspect Israel may have to go alone or maybe be neutral to what Iran is doing altogether. I think if we were to attack Iran, they would cut off Oil Supply to the west, causing a serious threat to the US Economy, plus the increased risk of a nuclear attack against the USA or Israel.
actioncjackson on Tue, 5th Mar 2013 4:06 pm
And they think repeating over and over the term “nuclear weapons” makes it true. Just like the Bush (puke) administration spammed the terms “terrorists” and “terrorism” and “weapons of mass destruction” to get us into Iraq. Don’t believe a word of this shit. Imperialism is still running strong.
PrestonSturges on Tue, 5th Mar 2013 5:02 pm
What’s that other Mideast socialist theocracy with nukes?
Oh yeah, Israel. When do we invade them?
DC on Tue, 5th Mar 2013 8:38 pm
The war-criminal Obama has no mandate to attack Iran, or anyone else for that matter. Besides, what is Forbes, a 1%er Wall St. rag doing articles like this for? A tacit admission perhaps the drive to destroy Iran has zilch to do with ‘nuclear weapons’ and everything to do with economic warfare against China, Russia, the EU and of course, the M.E. itself?
keith on Tue, 5th Mar 2013 11:52 pm
In other words, Obama doesn’t intend on attacking Iran, so lets put the pressure on him to do so.
J-Gav on Wed, 6th Mar 2013 12:16 am
Let’s put things in another perspective here. What if Iran had a nuke? We now know, since Jimmy Carter spilled the beans a few years ago, that Israel has 150 nuclear warheads. So Iran gets a bomb. They’re gonna drop it on Israel, somehow avoiding damage to their friends, the Palestinians, right next door? That’s not the issue folks! North Korea’s got it. Pakistan’s got it. And they’re not dropping it on anybody for the moment. Why? Because they know they’d be wiped off the face of the earth if they did. So would Iran.
The issue is Iran’s middle-range ballistic missiles, capable of taking out lots of Israel’s wealth and on-the-ground military hardware. Another nuke power which can’t and won’t be used is irrelevant. It’s Iran’s massive ballistic missile capability they want to eliminate. Question 1: Who has a better historical claim to regional hegemony than Iran? Answer: Nobody.
Question 2: Is the present regime in Iran likeable? Answer: No, but is ours or anybody else’s in the West morally blameless in the deaths, mutilations and displacement of millions of people in Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, etc? Answer: No: we’re moral midgets, hypocrites, thieves and shysters.
Wonderful world, ain’t it?